Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Boucher Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$185k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$352kFood & Nutrition$284kAnimals$141kHealth$123kReligion$44kEmployment$40kCivil Rights$37kPhilanthropy$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $103k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$26,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$14,000
MARTHA'S KITCHEN$14,000
NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$13,000
SECOND HARVEST SILICON VALLEY$13,000
LOAVES & FISHES$13,000
SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
ABILITY PATH$8,000
INCOURAGE$5,000
NCEFT$5,000
ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
SANTA CLARA COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER$3,000
HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY$3,000
ST PATRICK SEMINARY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $232k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOY'S TOWN: $1k → 12%YOUTH HOMES INC: $1k → 10%JERRY AND PAULA BAKER FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 14%YOUTH HOMES INC: $1k → 10%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $1k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $1k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $1k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $1k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $1k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $1k → 12%YOUTH HOMES: $2k → 9%YOUTH HOMES: $2k → 9%YOUTH HOMES: $2k → 9%YOUTH HOMES: $2k → 9%YOUTH HOMES: $1k → 9%YOUTH HOMES: $1k → 9%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $13k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $13k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $13k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $13k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $8k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $8k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $7k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $6k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $14k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $14k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $14k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $7k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $6k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $6k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $3k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $3k → 8%ABILITIES UNITED: $2k → 8%ABILITIES UNITED: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
WI
MA
CA
CO
NE
MD
AZ
KS
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 57 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

57 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+39%

Still filing today

54%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthEmploymentInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +68%
  • LA
    LOAVES AND FISHES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +18%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $68k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • PI
    PARKINSON INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
3
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
4
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
5
Santa Fe Animal Shelter and Humane Society Inc

To support animals, save lives, and spread compassion.

Animals
6
Valley Humane SocietyInc

Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…

Animals
7
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
8
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
9
Peninsula Humane Society & Spca

The peninsula humane society & spca, guided by the humane ethic, builds healthy relationships between people and animals.

Animals
10
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
11
Feral Cat SpayNeuter Project

Our mission is to save the lives of homeless cats by providing access to high volume spay/neuter surgery in a safe and humane environment, collaborating with others and mentoring like-minded organizations to increase spay/neuter in their…

Animals
12
The Animal Foundation

To promote humane treatment of animals by operating an open-admission regional shelter and providing lost and found services, rabies observation, foster and adoption services, affordable vaccination clinic, low cost spay and neuter,…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Flag Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
26/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $159,000 · OtherCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside CountiesMEALS ON WHEELS: $74,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSLOAVES AND FISHES: $68,000 · OtherLOAVES AND FISHESNCEFT: $36,690 · OtherNCEFTALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION: $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $24,000 · Other+37 more: $247,500 · Other+37 moreNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $81,000 · Human ServicesNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO …SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $67,000 · Human ServicesSACRED HEART COMMUNITY …MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $60,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S KITCHENYouth Homes Inc: $12,000 · Human Services+6 more: $16,500 · Human Services+6 moreFeral Cat Foundation: $21,200 · AnimalsBerkeley East Bay Humane Society Inc dba Berkeley Humane: $21,000 · AnimalsSanta Cruz SPCA and Humane Society: $12,000 · AnimalsFIX OUR FERALS: $10,000 · AnimalsPets In Need: $9,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $9,000 · Animals+2 more: $3,000 · AnimalsSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $68,000 · Food & NutritionTHE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $16,000 · HealthSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $14,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $10,000 · HealthVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $2,000 · HealthABILITYPATH: $38,000 · EmploymentJOBTRAIN INC: $2,000 · EmploymentINCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · PhilanthropyFLAG FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$641,190Human Services$236,500Animals$85,200Food & Nutrition$68,000Health$42,000Employment$40,000Philanthropy$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $159,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $81,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES: $68,000 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $68,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $67,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S KITCHEN: $60,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetABILITYPATH: $38,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeral Cat Foundation: $21,200 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetBerkeley East Bay Humane Society Inc dba Berkeley Humane: $21,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Homes Inc: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Cruz SPCA and Humane Society: $12,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFIX OUR FERALS: $10,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPets In Need: $9,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF SILICON VALLEY: $7,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAnimal Friends Rescue Project: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetABILITYPATH HOUSING: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetShepherds Gate: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOBTRAIN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJERRY AND PAULA BAKER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRATEFUL HEARTS ANIMAL RESCUE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCENTER FOR WHALE RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE OF WILDWORKS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
  • Who funds NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds ABILITYPATH ↗
  • Who funds Feral Cat Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Berkeley East Bay Humane Society Inc dba Berkeley Humane ↗
  • Who funds INCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Youth Homes Inc ↗
  • Who funds Santa Cruz SPCA and Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds FIX OUR FERALS ↗
  • Who funds Pets In Need ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CENTER OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Animal Friends Rescue Project ↗
  • Who funds THE WHITE KITTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA21.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Heffernan Group Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Floyd Family Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Agilent Technologies Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · East Bay Community Foundation · Valley Health Foundation (Vhf) · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Catholic Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Boucher Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Boucher Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Boucher Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Boucher Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Boucher Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph