Skip to content
The Boeckman Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Boeckman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$377k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$881kArts & Culture$807kEnvironment$487kHealth$431kHuman Services$86kPhilanthropy$60kYouth Development$16kAnimals$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $275k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH$175,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY TEXAS$100,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$10,000
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERV$10,000
ST PETERSBURG ARTS ALLIANCE$10,000
NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION$10,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$10,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$5,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY FLORIDA$5,000
FLORIDA CRAFT ART$5,000
THE PHILANTHROPY CONNECTION$5,000
WINNISQUAM WATERSHED NETWORK$5,000
TAMPA BAY WATCH$5,000
THE PHILANTHROPY CONNECTION$5,000
INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NUEVO MEXICO PROFUNDO: $25k → 18%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERV: $10k → 14%SUNFLOWER SCHOOL INC: $10k → 12%THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $175k → 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION: $15k → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $145k → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY TEXAS: $100k → 7%NUEVO MEXICO PROFUNDO: $25k → 18%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERV: $10k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $85k → 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION: $15k → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $100k → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY TEXAS: $68k → 7%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERV: $10k → 14%SUNFLOWER SCHOOL INC: $10k → 12%THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $85k → 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION: $10k → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $100k → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY TEXAS: $66k → 7%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERV: $10k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $85k → 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION: $10k → 12%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $70k → 12%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS: $66k → 7%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERV: $10k → 14%SEWANEE: $85k → 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERV: $10k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $85k → 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERV: $10k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $20k → 13%NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PR: $10k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $20k → 13%THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $20k → 13%CARROLL SCHOOL: $30k → 8%CARROLL SCHOOL: $25k → 8%CARROLL SCHOOL: $20k → 8%CARROLL SCHOOL: $15k → 8%PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT: $127k → 14%PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT: $100k → 14%PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT: $75k → 14%PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT: $75k → 14%PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
NY
MA
OR
CA
CO
VA
NM
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of The Boeckman Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Boeckman Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 52 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
25

Total granted

$2.6M
$178k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+30%

Still filing today

75%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH
    7× · 2017–2024 · $577k · revenue +44%
  • PV
    PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $427k · revenue +84%
  • DA
    DENVER ART MUSEUM
    4× · 2017–2020 · $415k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • S
    SEWANEE
    one grant, 2022 · $85k
  • SS
    SUNFLOWER SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +8%
  • NT
    NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PR
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
2
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
5
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Dallas Contemporary

Dallas contemporary presents art in a forum that cultivates artists, ignites learning and inspires the community. dallas contemporary is a non-collecting art museum presenting new and challenging ideas from regional, national and…

Arts & Culture
8
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
9
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
10
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
11
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
12
National Tropical Botanical Garden

To enrich life by perpetuating tropical plants, ecosystems and cultural heritage through discovery, scientific research, conservation, and education.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Call. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/58
Grantees still filing
48/58
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $577,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHDUKE UNIVERSITY: $125,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE CARROLL SCHOOL: $118,000 · EducationTHE CARROLL SCHOOL+9 more: $31,250 · EducationTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY TEXAS: $239,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY TEXASSEWANEE: $85,000 · OtherSEWANEETHE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS: $71,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXASNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERV: $70,000 · OtherNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRE…NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION INC: $60,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATI…Florida CraftArt Inc: $57,500 · OtherFlorida CraftArt IncDALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $29,000 · Other+31 more: $181,500 · Other+31 moreDENVER ART MUSEUM: $415,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUMNUEVO MEXICO PROFUNDO: $50,000 · Arts & CultureNUEVO MEXICO PROFUNDOST PETERSBURG ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureThe Dallas Opera: $21,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $21,000 · Arts & Culture+13 more: $83,000 · Arts & Culture+13 morePARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $427,000 · HealthPARKINSON VOICE P…+1 more: $1,500 · HealthThe Philanthropy Connection Inc: $54,000 · PhilanthropyLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $1,250 · PhilanthropyTAMPA BAY WATCH INC: $27,500 · EnvironmentDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentWINNISQUAM WATERSHED NETWORK: $5,000 · EnvironmentTURTLE CREEK ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · EnvironmentPUGET SOUND RESTORATION FUND: $3,500 · EnvironmentNORTH CAROLINA COASTAL LAND TRUST: $3,000 · Environment+2 more: $1,250 · EnvironmentDALLAS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Education$851,250Other$793,000Arts & Culture$620,000Health$428,500Philanthropy$65,250Environment$49,250Animals$5,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $577,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $427,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $415,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $125,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARROLL SCHOOL: $118,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFlorida CraftArt Inc: $57,500 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetThe Philanthropy Connection Inc: $54,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetNUEVO MEXICO PROFUNDO: $50,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetST PETERSBURG ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $30,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTAMPA BAY WATCH INC: $27,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Dallas Opera: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUNFLOWER SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD: $15,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetZUMIX INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHE-CAN GLOBAL INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY: $6,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMMONS CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN NH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DALLAS PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE DESERT CHORALE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINNISQUAM WATERSHED NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTURTLE CREEK ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUGET SOUND RESTORATION FUND: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COASTAL LAND TRUST: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTS CENTER ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CALL: $1,250 over 2y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CARROLL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Florida CraftArt Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Philanthropy Connection Inc ↗
  • Who funds NUEVO MEXICO PROFUNDO ↗
  • Who funds ST PETERSBURG ARTS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA BAY WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds The Dallas Opera ↗
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE OPERA ↗
  • Who funds SUNFLOWER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds ZUMIX INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHE-CAN GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS COUNTY HERITAGE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SAMMONS CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTexas Instruments Fou…The Eugene McDermott …The Hutson-Wiley and …Ibm International Fou…Communities Foundatio…Raymond James Charita…George a & Nancy P Sh…J Crayton Pruitt Foun…Community Foundation …Hal & Diane Brierley …Vin and Caren Prothro…
The Dallas FoundationTX21.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Eugene McDermott Foundation · The Hutson-Wiley and Echevarria Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · George a & Nancy P Shutt Foundation · J Crayton Pruitt Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Hal & Diane Brierley Foundation · Vin and Caren Prothro Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Boeckman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Boeckman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Zumix Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Eckerd College: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Boeckman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Boeckman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Boeckman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home