· Private foundation
J Crayton Pruitt Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k66 grants · $248k
- $10k–50k38 grants · $589k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLO | $100,000 |
| DALI MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY | $50,000 |
| ST PETER CLAVER CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $40,000 |
| CREATIVE CLAY | $40,000 |
| STARTING RIGHT NOW | $35,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOO | $30,000 |
| AMERICAN SOC OF OVERSEAS RESER (A | $25,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PA | $20,000 |
| SING OUTLOUD AND READ | $20,000 |
| UF HEALTH AORTIC DISEASE CENTER | $20,000 |
| SUNRISE DAY CAMP-PEARL RIVER | $20,000 |
| UF FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME | $20,000 |
| UF HEALTH PEDIATRIC CARDIAC ICU COM | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $591k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
130 repeat relationships — 71 still active in FY2025, 59 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SDSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC9× · 2017–2025 · $299k · revenue +44%
- SRSTARTING RIGHT NOW5× · 2020–2025 · $280k · revenue +15%
- CCCreative Clay Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $265k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- COCITY OF ST PETERSBURGone grant, 2018 · $150k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $75k
- TFTHE FRIENDS OF HOMOSASSA SPRINGS WIone grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +3% · 35% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.
The Florida Aquarium's mission focuses on our Shared Purpose of a commitment to save marine wildlife, with a Vision to be Florida's leading conservation-based Aquarium. It accomplishes this mission through hosting over 1 million visitors…
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
To promote visitation to florida by strengthening florida's share of the global travel market with the goal of maximizing the economic impact of travel and tourism to florida.
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cloud Nine Outdoors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
153 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 153 of the 268 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds STARTING RIGHT NOW ↗
- Who funds Creative Clay Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds PINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIO 620 INC ↗
- Who funds Clearwater Free Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF HOMOSASSA SPRINGS WI ↗
- Who funds THE MIQUON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF PINELLAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds TAMPA PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS OF ST PETERSBURG FLORIDA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Pinellas Community Foundation · Westphal Family Foundation Inc · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Gobioff Foundation · Foundation for a Healthy St Petersburg Inc · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · Thomas A & Mary S James Foundation · Dwayne Hawkins Family Foundation Inc D/B/A Crown Automotive Charities · Frank E Duckwall Foundation · Jacarlene Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization J Crayton Pruitt Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Florida Humanities Council Inc — 100% of income from government
- The Florida Trail Association Inc — 100% of income from government
- Ecosphere Restoration Institute Inc — 82% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Suwannee River Economic Council Inc — 19% of income from government
- Community Action Stops Abuse Inc — 13% of income from government
- Alpha House of Pinellas County Inc — 12% of income from government
- New Life Village Inc — 7% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- The Writers Center — 6% of income from government
- Alachua Conservation Trust Inc — 5% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc — 3% of income from government
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Childrens Museum — 1% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
- Fish & Wildlife Foundation of Florida I — 1% of income from government
- Great Explorations Inc — 1% of income from government
- Eckerd College — 0% of income from government
- Spca Inc — 0% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
- Bennington College Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Creative Clay Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.