Skip to content
The Bob and Patti Antin Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Bob and Patti Antin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$508k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.1MHealth$541kHuman Services$120kInternational$91kEducation$40kHousing & Shelter$40kYouth Development$40kRecreation & Sports$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $387k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDIN$170,000
Individual grant recipient$167,000
BEIT TSHUVAH$50,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$25,000
THE PEOPLE CONCERN$25,000
HAROLD PUMP CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION$25,000
LOS CABOS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$20,000
BRENTWOOD COUNTRY CLUB SCHLORARSHIP$10,000
TOWER CANCER RESEACH FDN$6,250
HEARTS IN HARMONY FOUNDATION$5,000
JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%LOS CABOS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%FIXT INC: $5k → 13%LOS CABOS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%LOS CABOS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $25k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
IN
CT
CA
CO
MD
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 17 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
14

Total granted

$2.2M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+2%

Still filing today

65%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    Beit T'Shuvah
    5× · 2021–2025 · $185k · revenue +14%
  • IT
    IMPACT THROUGH GOLF FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $120k · revenue +106%
  • TH
    THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION)
    3× · 2021–2023 · $80k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • MI
    MAY I PRAY FOR YOU MINISTRY
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue -31%
  • JN
    JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • RH
    REGISTER HER
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
7
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
8
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
9
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
10
Bikur Cholim

Bikur cholim organizes and subsidizes medical treatment, speech and physical therapy, medication, durable medical equipment, blood products, homecare, transportation, housing for patients and family-members, meals, and diagnostics while…

Health
11
La Jolla Institute for Immunology

At la jolla institute for immunology, our scientists focus on understanding how the immune system works in order to promote human health and prevent disease. our discoveries apply to many diseases, ranging from diabetes to heart disease,…

—
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Register Her. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDIN: $695,000 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDINIndividual grant recipient: $299,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $282,000 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INCBeit T'Shuvah: $185,000 · OtherBeit T'Shuvah+9 more: $147,000 · Other+9 moreSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $199,100 · HealthSAINT JOHN'S HEA…THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $80,000 · HealthTHE HAROLD AND C…TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $32,250 · HealthTOWER CANCER RES…BIGVISION Foundation: $20,000 · HealthBIGVISION Founda…+3 more: $23,000 · Health+3 moreIMPACT THROUGH GOLF FOUNDATION: $120,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $10,000 · PhilanthropyLos Cabos Children's Foundation: $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $40,000 · Human ServicesFixt Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $66,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $15,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 · InternationalBRENTWOOD COUNTRY CLUB EMPLOYEE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $17,000 · EducationKIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10,000 · EducationDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $3,000 · EducationJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $34,500 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF ST LAWRENCE-WATTS YOUTH CENTER: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,608,400Health$354,350Philanthropy$130,000Human Services$110,000International$91,000Education$40,000Youth Development$39,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $199,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $185,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetIMPACT THROUGH GOLF FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $80,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $66,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLos Cabos Children's Foundation: $65,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $34,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $32,250 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBIGVISION Foundation: $20,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMAY I PRAY FOR YOU MINISTRY: $17,500 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetBRENTWOOD COUNTRY CLUB EMPLOYEE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $17,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetREGISTER HER: $12,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHearts in Harmony Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRAY CAT ALLIANCE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFixt Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST LAWRENCE-WATTS YOUTH CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE JACKSON ACADEMY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLuMind IDSC Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodFidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA12.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bob and Patti Antin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bob and Patti Antin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bob and Patti Antin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home