Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bennett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$266k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$5.7MInternational$598kScience & Tech$278kReligion$271kEducation$197kPhilanthropy$145kYouth Development$56kEnvironment$39kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $266k
$156,733
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRANGE PARK OPERA$265,880
American Associates of the Old Vic Theatre Inc$248,940
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY lONDON$203,175
KING BAUDOUIN Foundation US inc$200,655
SIR JOHN SOANE'S MUSEUM FOUNDATION$189,630
INTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF THE NATURAL HISTORY$160,641
THE Wallace Collection in America INC$156,733
THE Royal Oak Foundation Inc$33,982
Glyndebourne America Inc$24,896
BUXTON ARTS FESTIVAL$20,193
Cambridge in America$17,300
International Friends of THE London Library Inc$5,694
WORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC$5,000
EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION$1,299
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 62% of grant dollars ($4.7M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 38% that went abroad ($2.9M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 38% of all-years giving ($2.9M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$2.9M · 73 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 23 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
49

Total granted

$4.2M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+45%

Still filing today

22%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2.0M · revenue +45% · 88% of their budget
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY LONDON INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $653k · revenue +123%
  • SV
    SAVE VENICE INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $38k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • OV
    OLD VIC THEATRE
    one grant, 2022 · $229k
  • SJ
    ST JAMES'S CHURCH PICCADILLY
    one grant, 2023 · $207k
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY
    one grant, 2023 · $197k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of English Heritage

The American Friends of the English Heritage was formed with the purpose of promoting the United Kingdom-Based charity English Heritage (ENGLISH-HERRITAGE.ORG.UK) in the United States through Educational activities and supporing English…

Arts & Culture
2
American Foundation of the Imperial War Museum Inc
Education
3
American Friends of the National Portrait Gallery (London) Foundation Inc

To encourage appreciation and understanding of the art of portraiture through support of the operations and activities of the national portrait gallery in london and its collaboration with american arts and academic institutions.

Arts & Culture
4
The American Patrons of the Tate Gallery Foundation Inc

>to conduct activities which are exclusively charitable, literary, and educational within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. >to sponsor art exhibitions and loans of art works throughout the united states which…

Arts & Culture
5
American Friends of the Royal Collection Inc

The corporation is formed (i) to promote collaborations between the royal collection trust, and other publicly supported organizations which are closely related in purpose or function, in the united kingdom and institutions in the united…

Arts & Culture
6
Calder Foundation
—
7
The American Trust for the British Library

The american trust for the british library (atbl) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting and supporting the work of the british library, one of the world's greatest research libraries. the atbl provides financial and…

Education
8
American Friends of Royal Museums Greenwich Inc

The primary objects of the fund are to educate the public about history, particularly the history of ships and seafaring in peace and war, from pre-history to today, and to educate the public about the story of time, astronomy and…

Arts & Culture
9
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
10
American Fund for the Southbank Centre Inc C/O Mcdermott Will & Emery Llp

The fund was formed for the exclusive purpose of providing financial support to the southbank centre, a charitable trust created in great britain and registered with the charity commission of england and wales (no.298909). the fund is…

International
11
The American Patrons of the National Library and Galleries of Scotland Inc

Raises funds for and makes grants to the national library of scotland and the national galleries of scotland in order to preserve the past for future generations; to record and preserve scottish culture, history, knowledge and ideas; and…

Arts & Culture
12
American Foundation for the National Museums Scotland

The american foundation for the national museums scotland was established to promote awareness,understanding and support for the work of national museums scotland.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Covent Garden the Royal Ballet Inc; the most unlike its peers is The J Paul Getty Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE OLD VIC THEATRE TRUST: $495,080 · OtherTHE OLD VIC THEATRE TRUSTGRANGE PARK OPERA: $265,880 · OtherGRANGE PARK OPERAOLD VIC THEATRE: $229,060 · OtherOLD VIC THEATREST JAMES'S CHURCH PICCADILLY: $206,992 · OtherST JAMES'S CHURCH PICCADILLYTHE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY: $197,025 · OtherTHE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERYAMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY: $173,312 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE ROYAL ACADEMYTHE ROYAL SOCIETY: $163,303 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY LONDON: $141,858 · Other+52 more: $1,369,262 · Other+52 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM INC: $2,032,745 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM I…MYRIAD USA INC: $518,725 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC+5 more: $141,440 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY LONDON INC: $652,911 · EducationAMERICAN FRI…THE WALLACE COLLECTION IN AMERICA INC: $156,733 · EducationTHE WALLACE …+2 more: $14,194 · EducationTHE AMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE OLD VIC THEATRE INC: $248,940 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERIC…SIR JOHN SOANE'S MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $189,630 · Arts & CultureSIR JOHN S…INTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF THE NATURAL HISTORY: $160,641 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIO…THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC: $33,982 · Arts & CultureVENETIAN HERITAGE INC: $28,503 · Arts & CultureGLYNDEBOURNE AMERICA INC CO THE LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD M BLOCK: $24,896 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $24,210 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $79,519 · PhilanthropyTHE J PAUL GETTY TRUST: $20,000 · PhilanthropyEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $2,568 · Human Services
Other$3,241,772International$2,692,910Education$823,838Arts & Culture$710,802Philanthropy$99,519Human Services$2,568

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM INC: $2,032,745 over 2y, 88% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY LONDON INC: $652,911 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $518,725 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $79,519 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC: $50,792 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAVE VENICE INC: $37,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC: $33,982 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $30,096 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVENETIAN HERITAGE INC: $28,503 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $17,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF THE LONDON LIBRARY INC: $10,694 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVICTORIA AND ALBERT MUSEUM AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $5,752 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF COVENT GARDEN THE ROYAL BALLET INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOKULEA AND HAWAIILOA: $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ALMEIDA THEATRE INC: $4,210 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $2,568 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY LONDON INC ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE OLD VIC THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds SIR JOHN SOANE'S MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF THE NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds THE WALLACE COLLECTION IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE VENICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ↗
  • Who funds VENETIAN HERITAGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Deborah Loeb Brice FoundationNY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Deborah Loeb Brice Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The New York Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bennett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bennett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Bennett Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Bennett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bennett’s filings →

    More from the funding graph