· Private foundation
The Deborah Loeb Brice Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $448k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+10 grants · $3.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE COURTAULD INSTITUTE OF ART | $435,750 |
| CHAPEL & YORK FOUNDATION INC | $380,250 |
| PRINCE'S TRUST AMERICA INC | $325,715 |
| CHAPEL & YORK FOUNDATION INC | $321,300 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANCER RESEARCH INC | $320,508 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY LONDON | $318,750 |
| INTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF LONDON LIBRARY | $318,725 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANCER RESEARCH INC | $312,150 |
| GENIUS 100 FOUNDATION | $300,000 |
| THE WINSTON CHURCHILL FOUNDATION OF THE US | $250,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF COVENT GARDEN | $193,604 |
| CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA | $191,915 |
| SIR JOHN SOANE'S MUSEUM FOUNDATION | $167,125 |
| CHAPEL & YORK FOUNDATION INC | $139,000 |
| SIR JOHN SOANE'S MUSEUM FOUNDATION | $126,470 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $410k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -31% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $561k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SJSIR JOHN SOANE'S MUSEUM FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +347% · 65% of their budget
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANCER RESEARCH INC2× · 2023–2024 · $944k · revenue +46%
- CICAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA5× · 2020–2024 · $416k · revenue +89%
Funded once
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY (LONDON) FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $1.2M · revenue -31% · 27% of their budget
- TRTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $430k · revenue +52%
- LGLake George Land Conservancy Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +133%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The American Friends of the English Heritage was formed with the purpose of promoting the United Kingdom-Based charity English Heritage (ENGLISH-HERRITAGE.ORG.UK) in the United States through Educational activities and supporing English…
>to conduct activities which are exclusively charitable, literary, and educational within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. >to sponsor art exhibitions and loans of art works throughout the united states which…
American friends of the british museum, inc. (afbm) was established in 1989 as a u.s. not-for-profit organization. the principal activity of afbm is to raise awareness of the activities and collections of the british museum among americans…
The v&a americas foundation is a u.s.-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that supports the victoria and albert museum (v&a) in london. its mission is to promote arts, design, and cultural heritage by facilitating philanthropic support…
To support the kings college mission and initiatives, to support usa scholars program, the kings college london annual fund and various kings college london based research projects.
The specific purposes for which bafta na is organized is to promote, maintain, improve and advance original and creative work among individuals employed professionally in film and television production and allied industries, to create and…
The Foundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies (FAPE) is dedicated to enhancing the United States' image abroad through American Art. Founded as a public-private, non-partisan partnership in 1986, FAPE works with the U.S. Department…
The organization continuously raises funds for the benefit of the london academy of music and dramatic art, and to support the academy's american scholarships fund.
To develop university college london's ("ucl") existing links with alumni and others in the usa.
The american trust for the british library (atbl) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting and supporting the work of the british library, one of the world's greatest research libraries. the atbl provides financial and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Covent Garden the Royal Ballet Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Bargello Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR COURTAULD INSTIT ↗
- Who funds CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY LONDON INC ↗
- Who funds THE KING'S TRUST USA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY (LONDON) FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIR JOHN SOANE'S MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANCER RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF COVENT GARDEN THE ROYAL BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF THE LONDON LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds UPPER SARANAC LAKE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GENIUS 100 FOUNDATION US ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL BALLET SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds TEAMWORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds The Madeira School ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ROYAL MUSEUMS GREENWICH INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LYFORD CAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Lake George Land Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BARGELLO INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL COLLECTION INC ↗
- Who funds American Friends of the Old Royal Naval College ↗
- Who funds SADLER'S WELLS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds JACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ADIRONDACK COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds TELLURIDE LIZARD HEADS ↗
- Who funds Adirondack Film Society Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bennett Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Arthur Loeb Foundation Inc · Blavatnik Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Deborah Loeb Brice Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Deborah Loeb Brice Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Deborah Loeb Brice Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.