Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ben and Peggy Kates Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$51kHousing & Shelter$45kHealth$44kArts & Culture$25kYouth Development$21kCommunity Improvement$11kCrime & Legal$8kFood & Nutrition$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$898k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES$7,500
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$7,500
TEEM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FIELDS FUTURES$5,000
LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE$5,000
PIVOT PROJECT OKC$2,500
YMCA$2,000
CASA$1,500
HOPE IS ALIVE$1,500
OKLAHOMA CITY VISUAL ARTS$1,000
PRAIRIE DANCE THEATRE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%PEPPERS RANCH: $500 → 12%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 16%LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE: $5k → 19%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 16%LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE: $5k → 19%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%STAND IN THE GAP: $3k → 16%STAND IN THE GAP: $2k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 16%PIVOT PROJECT OKC: $3k → 16%PIVOT PROJECT OKC: $3k → 16%PIVOT PROJECT OKC: $3k → 16%PIVOT PROJECT OKC: $1k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $1k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$172k · 17 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +81% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
12

Total granted

$172k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+81%

Still filing today

65%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PT
    POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +95%
  • SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +101%
  • OKC METRO ALLIANCE INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $17k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • SC
    SPECIAL CARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +224%
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
2
Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral Association Inc

Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…

—
3
Speck Homes Inc

Speck homes, inc. provides group residential home rehabilitation services to teenage males under contracts with the oklahoma department of human services and the oklahoma office for juvenile affairs.

—
4
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
5
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
6
Youth and Family Services Inc

Youth & family services, inc. provides emergency shelter, counseling, delinquency prevention, independent living, and education programs to children with special needs and at-risk youth.

Human Services
7
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
8
Peaceful Family Solutions Inc

Peaceful family solutions dba peaceful family oklahoma (pfo) offers free trauma-informed, age-appropriate, evidence-based, hope-centered programs through day camp and school-based models for children aged 4-18. a key component of the…

Human Services
9
Sunny Oaks Inc

Sunny Oaks provides 24 hour residential services, supported living, nutritional, community and training services for individuals with I/DD (Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities) referred by state and county governments. Services…

—
10
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
11
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
12
Independent Opportunties Inc of Oklahoma

Provide the highest quality residential services to people with developmental disabilities. a major part of the mission is to provide opportunities to these individuals based upon their right to a normal daily routine. specifically, it is…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prairie Dance Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GROUND ZERO COMMUNITY YOUTH: $12,500 · OtherGROUND ZERO COMMUNITY YOUTHTEEM: $12,500 · OtherTEEMFIELDS FUTURES: $11,000 · OtherFIELDS FUTURESOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS: $10,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTSCASA: $7,500 · OtherCASAHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOKLAHOMA CITY VISUAL ARTS: $3,000 · Other+8 more: $10,000 · Other+8 moreSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INCSPECIAL CARE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL CARE INCOKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH INC dba LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE: $10,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH INC dba…PIVOT INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesPIVOT INCSTAND IN THE GAP INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesSTAND IN THE GAP INC+2 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $37,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOSITIVE TOMORROWS…OKC METRO ALLIANCE INC: $17,000 · HealthOKC METRO A…HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $6,250 · HealthHOPE IS ALI…REMERGE INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalPrairie Dance Theatre Inc: $6,500 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureFOCUS ON HOME INC: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterRAINBOW FLEET INC: $1,500 · Education
Other$76,500Human Services$66,000Youth Development$37,000Health$23,250Crime & Legal$10,000Arts & Culture$8,500Housing & Shelter$2,500Education$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $37,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOKC METRO ALLIANCE INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetREMERGE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH INC dba LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPIVOT INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPrairie Dance Theatre Inc: $6,500 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $6,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND IN THE GAP INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOCUS ON HOME INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW FLEET INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEPPERS RANCH INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDMOND MOBILE MEALS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWhite Fields Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds OKC METRO ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds REMERGE INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH INC dba LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
  • Who funds Prairie Dance Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds STAND IN THE GAP INC ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS ON HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW FLEET INC ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds EDMOND MOBILE MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds White Fields Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Wegener Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Servant Foundation · Potts Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ben and Peggy Kates Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ben and Peggy Kates Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ben and Peggy Kates’ filings →

More from the funding graph