Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Potts Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$628k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Community Improvement$1.2MHuman Services$722kEducation$263kHealth$189kCrime & Legal$141kYouth Development$40kArts & Culture$30kFood & Nutrition$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $388k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Oklahoma Center for Nonprofits$140,000
Legacy Parenting Center$101,223
Western Plains Youth Family Service$87,586
Delaware County Community Partnersh$59,521
LIFT Community Action Agency$48,665
Rural Health Projects Inc$38,630
Northern Oklahoma Youth Services$37,143
Oklahoma Institute for Child Advoca$26,000
Sunbeam Family Services$25,000
Community Resourcing Inc$23,019
Great Plains Youth Family Services$21,000
Community Action Project of Tulsa C$10,000
Veterans for Life USA$1,000
Okla Youth Hunting Shooting Program$1,000
Garfield County Child Advocacy Coun$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $473k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Center For Children and Families: $14k → 13%Western Plains Youth Family Service: $88k → 15%Legacy Parenting Center: $101k → 19%KI BOIS Community Action Foundation: $500 → 21%Great Plains Youth Family Services: $21k → 23%LIFT Community Action Agency: $49k → 24%Center For Children and Families: $11k → 13%Western Plains Youth Family Service: $1k → 15%Great Plains Youth Family Services: $14k → 23%Little Dixie Community Action Agenc: $12k → 24%Center For Children and Families: $11k → 13%Garfield County Child Advocacy Coun: $1k → 16%Great Plains Youth Family Services: $10k → 23%Little Dixie Community Action Agenc: $10k → 24%Center For Children and Families: $10k → 13%Great Plains Youth Family Services: $8k → 23%LIFT Community Action Agency: $10k → 24%Center For Children and Families: $9k → 13%Garfield County Child Advocacy Coun: $1k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $25k → 16%Great Plains Youth Family Services: $5k → 23%Little Dixie Community Action Agenc: $1k → 24%Garfield County Child Advocacy Coun: $1k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $13k → 16%Garfield County Child Advocacy Coun: $1k → 16%Garfield County Child Advocacy Coun: $1k → 16%Garfield County Child Advocacy Coun: $1k → 16%Assistance League of Norman: $1k → 13%Assistance League of Norman: $500 → 13%Community Service Council: $2k → 15%Divine Wisdom TASK: $1k → 16%Crosstown Learning Center Inc: $1k → 15%Family and Children's Services: $1k → 15%Latino Community Development Agency: $13k → 16%Urban League of Greater Oklahoma Ci: $2k → 16%Latino Community Development Agency: $9k → 16%Urban League of Greater Oklahoma Ci: $1k → 16%Latino Community Development Agency: $8k → 16%Urban League of Greater Oklahoma Ci: $1k → 16%Latino Community Development Agency: $2k → 16%Urban League of Greater Oklahoma Ci: $1k → 16%Latino Community Development Agency: $1k → 16%Latino Community Development Agency: $1k → 16%Infant Crisis Services: $1k → 16%Urban League of Greater Oklahoma Ci: $500 → 16%Pivot Inc: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 48 repeat orgs$300k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

48 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
32

Total granted

$2.3M
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+49%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $261k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +214%
  • SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $116k · revenue +101%
  • WESTERN PLAINS YOUTH AND FAMILY INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $89k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • BT
    Beyond the Spectrum Oklahoma
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • HS
    HOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +46%
  • OW
    Oklahoma Womens Coalition Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -99%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
2
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
3
Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral Association Inc

Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…

—
4
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
5
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
6
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
7
Oklahoma Afterschool Network Inc

Works to ensure that all children and youth in Oklahoma have access to safe and enriching learning opportunities during their out-of-school time.

—
8
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
9
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
10
Oklahoma Casa Association Inc

To provide a statewide voice for children by enhancing & sustaining the growth of local casa programs which provide trained community volunteers to represent the best interests of abused & neglected children.

Human Services
11
Oklahoma Connections Academy Inc

Oklahoma connections inc, a public charter school, uses the connections curriculum to offer oklahoma students in grades k-12 an exceptional learning experience.

Education
12
Child Welfare Citizen Board of Can Co Oklahoma Inc

to provide a safe, child-friendly environment for abused children

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Oklahoma City Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr14%34%35–55yr15%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%62%20–35yr14%18%35–55yr15%13%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/62
the rest of the field
14%
1,406/9,904

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/58
Grantees still filing
46/58
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC — $1,127,477 · Community ImprovementOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC+1 more — $11,000 · Community ImprovementIndividual grant recipient — $76,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUniversity of OK Health Sciences Ce — $70,000 · OtherUniversity of OK Health Scien…Reach Out and Read Oklahoma — $63,500 · OtherReach Out and Read OklahomaOklahoma Institute for Child Advoca — $60,500 · OtherOklahoma Institute for Child …Delaware County Community Partnersh — $59,521 · OtherDelaware County Community Par…Community Action Project of Tulsa C — $46,250 · OtherCommunity Action Project of T…Okla Partnership for School Readine — $42,500 · OtherOkla Partnership for School R…THE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC — $41,000 · OtherTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA…NORTHERN OKLA YOUTH SERVICES CENTER & SHELTER INC — $37,143 · OtherNORTHERN OKLA YOUTH SERVICES …CARE Center OKC — $31,500 · OtherOklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc — $25,000 · Other+42 more — $129,910 · Other+42 moreSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC — $116,000 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES…LEGACY PARENTING CENTER INC — $101,223 · Human ServicesLEGACY PARENTING CENTER…WESTERN PLAINS YOUTH AND FAMILY INC — $88,586 · Human ServicesWESTERN PLAINS YOUTH AN…LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $81,665 · Human ServicesLIFT COMMUNITY ACTION A…Great Plains Youth & Family Service — $57,000 · Human ServicesGreat Plains Youth & Fa…CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $53,750 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHILDREN & F…LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC — $33,000 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELO…+10 more — $20,000 · Human ServicesEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC — $61,000 · Crime & LegalChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network — $60,000 · Crime & LegalREMERGE INC — $9,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $3,000 · Crime & LegalRURAL HEALTH PROJECTS INC — $38,630 · EducationUNION SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $12,500 · EducationRAINBOW FLEET INC — $12,000 · EducationNORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $5,500 · Education+4 more — $4,500 · EducationCOMMUNITY RESOURCING INC dba OUR DAILY BREAD FOOD & RESOURCE CTR — $23,019 · Food & NutritionHOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $4,000 · Housing & ShelterFOCUS ON HOME INC — $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Community Improvement$1,138,477Other$682,824Human Services$551,224Crime & Legal$133,000Education$73,130Food & Nutrition$23,019Housing & Shelter$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC — $1,127,477 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC — $116,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLEGACY PARENTING CENTER INC — $101,223 over 1y, 11% of budgetWESTERN PLAINS YOUTH AND FAMILY INC — $88,586 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $81,665 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC — $61,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network — $60,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetGreat Plains Youth & Family Service — $57,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $53,750 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC — $41,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetRURAL HEALTH PROJECTS INC — $38,630 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetNORTHERN OKLA YOUTH SERVICES CENTER & SHELTER INC — $37,143 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC — $33,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCING INC dba OUR DAILY BREAD FOOD & RESOURCE CTR — $23,019 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRose State College Foundation — $13,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetUNION SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetRAINBOW FLEET INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO — $11,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMILLWOOD ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetREMERGE INC — $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOAK HALL EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION FOR INFANT MENTAL HEALTH — $6,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetGARFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $5,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGROVE EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR EXCE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEL SISTEMA OKLAHOMA INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOklahoma Womens Coalition Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA YOUTH HUNTING AND SHOOTING PROGRAM INC — $2,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFOCUS ON HOME INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Community College Foundation — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Service Council Inc dba Oklahoma Veterans United — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAssistance League of Norman Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA POLICY INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ENID AND NORTHWEST OKLAHOMA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTulsa Lawyers for Children Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN EDUCATION — $1,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetThe Pencil Box Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY PARENTING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN PLAINS YOUTH AND FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Child Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network ↗
  • Who funds Great Plains Youth & Family Service ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds RURAL HEALTH PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN OKLA YOUTH SERVICES CENTER & SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Educational Television Authority Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCING INC dba OUR DAILY BREAD FOOD & RESOURCE CTR ↗
  • Who funds Rose State College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNION SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW FLEET INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO ↗
  • Who funds MILLWOOD ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REMERGE INC ↗
  • Who funds OAK HALL EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION FOR INFANT MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds GARFIELD COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…The Anne and Henry Za…Oklahoma City Communi…Sarkeys FoundationEl and Thelma Gaylord…Inasmuch FoundationArvest FoundationAmerican Fidelity Fou…George Kaiser Family …One Gas Foundation IncWegener Foundation IncThe Merrick Foundation
Communities Foundation of OklahomaOK45.6× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Arvest Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · Wegener Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Potts Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 220%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Rural Health Projects Inc — 72% of income from government
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc — 52% of income from government
  • Tulsa Educare Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Lift Community Action Agency Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
  • Ki Bois Community Action Foundation — 10% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Community Development Support Associatio — 2% of income from government
  • El Sistema Oklahoma Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
22get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines