Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Autrey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$263kHealth$221kYouth Development$155kReligion$106kPublic Benefit$86kCommunity Improvement$73kFood & Nutrition$49kArts & Culture$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JAZZ ASPEN SNOWMASS$10,200
FOOD FOR THOUGHT$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
COLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE$10,000
TURNING POINT$10,000
CRAIG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
JR ACHIEVEMENT ENDOWMENT FUND$10,000
PROJECT ANGEL HEART$10,000
THE MASTER'S APPRENTICE$10,000
PRAGERU$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$8,700
INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE$5,500
BULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER$5,250
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF KITTANNING$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION RMC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CARING SOLUTIONS: $2k → 11%Freedom Service Dogs Inc: $5k → 8%Freedom Service Dogs Inc: $5k → 8%Freedom Service Dogs Inc: $5k → 8%Freedom Service Dogs Inc: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
MI
NY
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
NC
DC
HI
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 60 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

60 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
28

Total granted

$1.2M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+29%

Still filing today

57%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPublic BenefitCrime & LegalArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PROJECT ANGEL HEART
    9× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +138%
  • CY
    COLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +132%
  • CH
    Craig Hospital Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +228%

Funded once

  • GD
    GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +27%
  • CC
    Cherry Creek High School
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • TC
    The Club Q Shooting Tragedy (Colorado Healing Fund)
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
2
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
3
Education Commission of the States

The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…

Education
4
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
5
Colorado Fiscal Institute

To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity

Community Improvement
6
Colorado Bar Association

To advance the science of jurisprudence, secure the more efficient administration of justice, encourage the adoption of proper legislation, advocate thorough and continuing legal education, uphold the honor and integrity of the bar,…

—
7
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
8
Colorado Campaign for Inclusive Excellence

The mission of the center for legal inclusiveness (cli) is to advance diversity in the legal profession by actively educating and supporting private and public sector legal organizations in their individual campaigns to create cultures of…

Civil Rights
9
Colorado Chamber of Commerce Fka Co Assn of Commerce & Industry

The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…

—
10
Institute for Shipboard Education

Journeys of discovery that spark bold solutions to global challenges.

Education
11
Colorado Health Institute
Health
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League; the most unlike its peers is Veterans Suicide Awareness & Remembrance Flag Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/52
Grantees still filing
39/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $48,500 · OtherDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDRENCenter Hill Church of Brethren: $45,000 · OtherCenter Hill Church of BrethrenFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF KITTANNING: $45,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF KITTANNINGAlzheimer's Association RMC: $41,250 · OtherAlzheimer's Association RMCJR ACHIEVEMENT ENDOWMENT FUND: $38,900 · OtherJR ACHIEVEMENT ENDOWMENT FUNDFOOD FOR THOUGHT: $38,500 · OtherFOOD FOR THOUGHTCU Foundation (Cancer Cure): $30,465 · OtherCOLORADO COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $29,300 · OtherColorado State University: $26,734 · OtherCHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT PTCO CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE ELEMENTARY: $23,000 · Other+56 more: $318,350 · Other+56 moreUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $48,700 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…COLORADO UPLIFT INC: $36,700 · EducationCOLORADO UPLI…PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $31,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVER…GROVE CITY COLLEGE: $22,200 · EducationGROVE CITY CO…HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $9,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COL…+1 more: $200 · EducationCraig Hospital Foundation: $66,500 · HealthGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $5,735 · HealthColorado Gynecologic Cancer Alliance: $5,500 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $4,100 · Health+7 more: $10,700 · HealthSAVE OUR YOUTH INC: $45,000 · Crime & LegalTHE MASTER'S APPRENTICE INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalBULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER: $16,030 · Crime & LegalINDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $68,700 · Public BenefitSailAhead Corporation: $13,900 · Public Benefit+2 more: $1,600 · Public BenefitPROJECT ANGEL HEART: $72,950 · Community ImprovementCOLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE: $72,900 · Youth Development
Other$684,999Education$147,800Health$92,535Crime & Legal$86,030Public Benefit$84,200Community Improvement$72,950Youth Development$72,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT ANGEL HEART: $72,950 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE: $72,900 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetINDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $68,700 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $66,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $48,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $48,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSAVE OUR YOUTH INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOLORADO UPLIFT INC: $36,700 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $29,300 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MASTER'S APPRENTICE INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT PTCO CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE ELEMENTARY: $23,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $22,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER: $16,030 over 5y, 14% of budgetJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $14,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSailAhead Corporation: $13,900 over 8y, 11% of budgetBill of Rights Institute: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER YOUNG ARTISTS ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $7,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $5,735 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON SENSE INSTITUTE: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Gynecologic Cancer Alliance: $5,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $4,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFine Arts Foundation: $3,400 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT PTCO WEST MIDDLE SCHOOL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSERVICES BY DESIGN DBA CARING SOLUTIONS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpina Bifida Association of Colorado: $2,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetIdaho Humane Society Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLD CROWN FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS SUICIDE AWARENESS & REMEMBRANCE FLAG CORP: $2,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetUNITED WAR VETERANS COUNCIL INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST INC: $1,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSamaritan Counseling Center: $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE WORLD SURGERY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRENT ELEY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HEART ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SAVE OUR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MASTER'S APPRENTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT PTCO CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE ELEMENTARY ↗
  • Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds BULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS ↗
  • Who funds SailAhead Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Bill of Rights Institute ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DENVER YOUNG ARTISTS ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO30.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Daniels Fund · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Tyl Foundation · The Denver Children's Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Libertygives Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Autrey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Autrey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Autrey Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Autrey Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Autrey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph