Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Arhant Social Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.9MInternational$866kReligion$814kEnvironment$346kHealth$249kYouth Development$172kPublic Safety & Disaster$150kArts & Culture$55kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $903k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.3M
$77,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$229M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC$1,550,000
ROANOKE AREA MINISTRIES$760,943
Individual grant recipient$222,978
UNICEF USA$200,000
ADVIT FOUNDATION$172,811
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF APPALACHIA$130,000
Individual grant recipient$77,000
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELPAGE INDIA INC$50,000
DEEPALAYA$45,301
EDU GIRLS INC$15,000
RISE AGAINST HUNGER$12,000
MERCY SHIPS$12,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HOPKINSVILLE CHRISTIAN COUNTY INC$3,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 74% of grant dollars ($3.5M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 26% that went abroad ($1.2M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $6k → 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELPAGE INDIA INC: $50k → 14%GUARDIANS OF EFFINGHAM ANIMAL RESERVE: $2k → 9%GUARDIANS OF EFFINGHAM ANIMAL RESERVE: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 26% of all-years giving ($1.2M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$1.2M · 16 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 48% of The Arhant Social Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Arhant Social Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 61% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 8 repeat orgs$747k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
28

Total granted

$3.9M
$445k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
-17%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $303k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.8M · revenue -14%
  • RA
    Roanoke Area Ministries
    2× · 2022–2024 · $771k · revenue +187% · 30% of their budget
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    2× · 2022–2024 · $425k · revenue -21%

Funded once

  • CI
    CARE INDIA SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • VT
    VIRGINIA TRANSFORMER CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $56k · revenue +110%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $53k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa)

The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.

Food & Nutrition
2
Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.

International
3
Educate Girls

Educate Girls promotes and protects the right of girls to a quality education and works by supporting partners in geographies where the need is greatest to mobilize communities, enroll girls into school and improve learning outcomes. Our…

International
4
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
5
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
6
Sai Global Mission

Sai Global Mission (SGM) is a Non-Profit Organization focused on Societal advancement initiatives for helping rural communities and offering free services to the underserved in the areas of healthcare, education, nutrition and rural care…

International
7
Splash International

The mission of Splash International and its subsidiaries is to ensure clean water for children. Splash partners with governments and local organizations to deliver sustainable water, sanitation, hygiene, and menstrual health programs in…

Environment
8
Fflv Usa

Food for life vrindavan has been working in india since 1991. our work includes free meal distribution, cleaning and tree planting, paper recycling , organic farming, and a sewing and embroidery centre (providing training & employment…

International
9
Asha Partners

To eliminate poverty through the creation of sustainable and effective community development projects, and to create holistic transformation by bringing hope, empowerment, and healing to those with the greatest need.

Religion
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
Goal Usa Inc

To provide relief and development assistance to underdeveloped countries

International
12
Sanitation and Health Rights in India

SHRI fights alongside communities to end open defecation as a key step in an ongoing struggle for health equity and soical and economic justice.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share and Care Foundation for India; the most unlike its peers is The Samuel L Asbury Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Roanoke Area Ministries: $770,943 · OtherRoanoke Area MinistriesIndividual grant recipient: $389,978 · OtherIndividual grant recipientADVIT FOUNDATION: $372,173 · OtherADVIT FOUNDATIONCARE INDIA SOLUTIONS: $150,000 · OtherCARE INDIA SOLUTIONSBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF APPALACHIA: $130,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF APPALACHIAIndividual grant recipient: $122,590 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+22 more: $311,953 · Other+22 moreSUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC: $1,750,000 · EducationSUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $425,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES…EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $50,000 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAY…EDU-GIRLS INC: $32,500 · InternationalEDU-GIRLS INCPOLARIS PROJECT: $20,000 · International+3 more: $34,000 · International+3 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELPAGE INDIA INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesGUARDIANS OF EFFINGHAM ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOPKINSVILLE- CHRISTIAN COUNTY INC: $3,200 · Youth DevelopmentThe Samuel L Asbury Foundation Inc: $1,000 · Health
Other$2,247,637Education$1,750,000International$561,500Human Services$70,000Crime & Legal$10,000Youth Development$3,200Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC: $1,750,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetRoanoke Area Ministries: $770,943 over 2y, 30% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $425,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA TRANSFORMER CORPORATION: $55,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELPAGE INDIA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetEDU-GIRLS INC: $32,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOPKINSVILLE- CHRISTIAN COUNTY INC: $3,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Samuel L Asbury Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGREENVALE SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Roanoke Area Ministries ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA TRANSFORMER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELPAGE INDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds EDU-GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds RISE AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA ↗
  • Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds GUARDIANS OF EFFINGHAM ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOPKINSVILLE- CHRISTIAN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Samuel L Asbury Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREENVALE SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arhant Social Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arhant Social Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 64%
  • Plummer Youth Promise Inc: 64% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Arhant Social Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Arhant Social Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arhant Social’s filings →

More from the funding graph