· Private foundation
The Arhant Social Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $3k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $84k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $903k
- $250k+2 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC | $1,550,000 |
| ROANOKE AREA MINISTRIES | $760,943 |
| Individual grant recipient | $222,978 |
| UNICEF USA | $200,000 |
| ADVIT FOUNDATION | $172,811 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF APPALACHIA | $130,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $77,000 |
| EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELPAGE INDIA INC | $50,000 |
| DEEPALAYA | $45,301 |
| EDU GIRLS INC | $15,000 |
| RISE AGAINST HUNGER | $12,000 |
| MERCY SHIPS | $12,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HOPKINSVILLE CHRISTIAN COUNTY INC | $3,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 74% of grant dollars ($3.5M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 26% that went abroad ($1.2M) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 26% of all-years giving ($1.2M)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 48% of The Arhant Social Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $303k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1.8M · revenue -14%
- RARoanoke Area Ministries2× · 2022–2024 · $771k · revenue +187% · 30% of their budget
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF2× · 2022–2024 · $425k · revenue -21%
Funded once
- CICARE INDIA SOLUTIONSone grant, 2021 · $150k
- VTVIRGINIA TRANSFORMER CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $56k · revenue +110%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $53k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.
Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.
Educate Girls promotes and protects the right of girls to a quality education and works by supporting partners in geographies where the need is greatest to mobilize communities, enroll girls into school and improve learning outcomes. Our…
Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
Sai Global Mission (SGM) is a Non-Profit Organization focused on Societal advancement initiatives for helping rural communities and offering free services to the underserved in the areas of healthcare, education, nutrition and rural care…
The mission of Splash International and its subsidiaries is to ensure clean water for children. Splash partners with governments and local organizations to deliver sustainable water, sanitation, hygiene, and menstrual health programs in…
Food for life vrindavan has been working in india since 1991. our work includes free meal distribution, cleaning and tree planting, paper recycling , organic farming, and a sewing and embroidery centre (providing training & employment…
To eliminate poverty through the creation of sustainable and effective community development projects, and to create holistic transformation by bringing hope, empowerment, and healing to those with the greatest need.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
To provide relief and development assistance to underdeveloped countries
SHRI fights alongside communities to end open defecation as a key step in an ongoing struggle for health equity and soical and economic justice.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share and Care Foundation for India and the most unlike its peers is The Samuel L Asbury Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Roanoke Area Ministries ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA TRANSFORMER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELPAGE INDIA INC ↗
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds EDU-GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds RISE AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION FOR INDIA ↗
- Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds GUARDIANS OF EFFINGHAM ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOPKINSVILLE- CHRISTIAN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GREENVALE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds The Samuel L Asbury Foundation Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Arhant Social Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Plummer Youth Promise Inc — 64% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Arhant Social Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Arhant Social Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.