Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Aram and Margie Keith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$415k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$4.9MEducation$103kInternational$100kHuman Services$20kHousing & Shelter$15kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $305k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSE ROAD MINISTRIES$225,000
SADDLEBACK CHURCH$80,000
INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES$25,000
THE INSTITUTE FOR DISCIPLESHIP TRAINING$20,000
BOY WITH A BALL MINISTRIES$15,000
HILDEGARD COLLEGE$15,000
FRONTIERS USA$10,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC$10,000
THE GARUNA FOUNDATION$5,000
MISSION OF CHRIST NETWORK$5,000
GLOBE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JOURNEY FOR LIFE: $10k → 11%JOURNEY FOR LIFE: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OH
CA
MO
AZ
TN
NC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 19 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
13

Total granted

$5.0M
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+118%

Still filing today

53%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationInternationalPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BW
    BOY WITH A BALL GLOBAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +245%
  • MC
    MISSIO CHRISTI NETWORK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $130k · revenue +133%
  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE
    2× · 2018–2021 · $52k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +120%
  • PH
    PHILIP HAYDEN FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -67%
  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Adventive Cross Cultural Initiatives

ACCI serves pioneering Christians, empowering them to proclaim the gospel, fulfill their God-given visions, and advance the kingdom of God. ACCI longs for a world where lives are transformed through the Holy Spirit, where new disciples are…

Religion
5
Global Outreach Inc

To share Christian compassion and love in an effort to alleviate spiritual, physical, emotional and mental suffering around the world. We help care for orphans and vulnerable children, teens and women in need. We provide training and…

International
6
Christian Mission to the Orient

The organization is a missionary sending/sponsoring organizations that engage in Christian evangelism and training leaders for the churches in SE Asia

—
7
Christian Harvest International Min

To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.

Religion
8
Church Dynamics International

Serving and empowering pastors and church leaders to equip healthy and dynamic churches globally by using the corporates strategies and training

—
9
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
10
Christian World Outreach

Providing responsible evangelism, leadership, development, and humanitarian assistance.

Employment
11
CrossTalk Global

CrossTalk Global is a Christian educational organization that empowers and trains global church leaders to effectively communicate the Scriptures and share the hope of Christ in their communities. These projects are carried out in the USA…

Religion
12
Horizonte Ministries

For the promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ and to invest in the planting of churches.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missio Christi Network; the most unlike its peers is Bose Road Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOSE ROAD MINISTRIES: $3,540,000 · PhilanthropyBOSE ROAD MINISTRIESSADDLEBACK CHURCH: $526,000 · OtherSADDLEBACK CHURCHINSTITUTE OF DISCIPLESHIP TRAINING: $80,000 · OtherINSTITUTE OF DISCI…CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $70,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR…BRANCHES: $40,000 · OtherFRONTIERS USA: $30,000 · Other+11 more: $87,600 · Other+11 moreThe Institute for Discipleship Training: $221,250 · ReligionThe Institut…BOY WITH A BALL GLOBAL INC: $135,000 · ReligionBOY WITH A B…MISSIO CHRISTI NETWORK: $130,000 · ReligionMISSIO CHRIS…INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $30,000 · ReligionINTERNATIONA…MIO Frontiers: $20,500 · Religion+1 more: $10,000 · ReligionCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $52,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationCapistrano Valley Christian Schools Inc: $15,000 · EducationHILDEGARD COLLEGE: $15,000 · EducationARMENIAN RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · InternationalCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $20,000 · InternationalPHILIP HAYDEN FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · InternationalJourney for Life: $20,000 · Human ServicesSHELTER PROVIDERS OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE GARUNA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$3,540,000Other$833,600Religion$546,750Education$102,000International$80,000Human Services$20,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOSE ROAD MINISTRIES: $3,540,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetThe Institute for Discipleship Training: $221,250 over 6y, 36% of budgetBOY WITH A BALL GLOBAL INC: $135,000 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetMISSIO CHRISTI NETWORK: $130,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $52,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARMENIAN RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIO Frontiers: $20,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILIP HAYDEN FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJourney for Life: $20,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCapistrano Valley Christian Schools Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHELTER PROVIDERS OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHILDEGARD COLLEGE: $15,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSoul Shepherding: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE GARUNA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFILTER OF HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOSE ROAD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds The Institute for Discipleship Training ↗
  • Who funds BOY WITH A BALL GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSIO CHRISTI NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND ↗
  • Who funds PHILIP HAYDEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Journey for Life ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Capistrano Valley Christian Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER PROVIDERS OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HILDEGARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Soul Shepherding ↗
  • Who funds THE GARUNA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FILTER OF HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA13.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Aram and Margie Keith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Aram and Margie Keith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aram and Margie Keith Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph