· Private foundation
The Annette and Anthony Albanese Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NAMI QUEENS-NASSAU INC | $5,000 |
| USDAN CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE AND PERFORMING ARTS | $5,000 |
| TELL EVERY AMAZING LADY ABOUT OVARIAN CANCER FOUND | $4,500 |
| WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL | $2,500 |
| LONG ISLAND CARES INC | $2,500 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER The Societ | $2,500 |
| NORTH SHORE CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
| ARDEN THEATRE COMPANY | $2,000 |
| WEST END COMMUNITY CHURCH | $2,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER The Societ | $1,500 |
| HYPEREMESIS EDUCATION & RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| PROJECT NYAME NSA LTD | $1,000 |
| COREGIVING CO | $1,000 |
| NORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUSE INC | $1,000 |
| CHICK MISSION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $791k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LONG ISLAND INC5× · 2018–2023 · $765k · revenue +24%
- UCUSDAN CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE AND PERFORMING ARTS8× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +13%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2022 · $16k · revenue +159%
Funded once
- FRFAMILY RESIDENCES AND ESSENTIAL ENTERPRISES INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +47%
- NYNEW YORK UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF LAWone grant, 2017 · $5k
- VHVassar Health Connecticut Incone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Residences and Essential Enterprises Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hearing Loss Association of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LONG ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds USDAN CENTER FOR THE CREATIVE AND PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESIDENCES AND ESSENTIAL ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH SHORE HOLIDAY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
- Who funds NAMI QueensNassau Inc ↗
- Who funds Vassar Health Connecticut Inc ↗
- Who funds THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association ↗
- Who funds CONNECTING CULTURES MOBILE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ARDEN THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ADVENTURES IN LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE GLOBAL LTD ↗
- Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center ↗
- Who funds CoreGiving Co ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds PORTERS CALL ↗
- Who funds United We Om Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Marilyn Lichtman Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The New York Community Trust · Equitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Annette and Anthony Albanese Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Hyperemesis Education and Research Foundation — 4% of income from government
- Emmanuel College — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Annette and Anthony Albanese Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Annette and Anthony Albanese Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.