Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Anderson Fund Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$125kInternational$78kEnvironment$74kArts & Culture$64kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kCrime & Legal$33kEducation$27kFood & Nutrition$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION$10,000
WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL$8,000
DIRECT RELIEF$5,000
MOUNTAIN AREA PRESERVATION$5,000
SIERRA WATCH$4,500
CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND$3,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$3,000
COMMUNITY ROOTS CHARTER SCHOOL$2,000
UNITY EARTH$2,000
KPOO$2,000
GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER$2,000
EARTH JUSTICE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Ellis Marsalis Center for Music: $500 → 23%SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES: $1k → 11%Sierra Senior Services: $1k → 10%Sierra Senior Services: $1k → 10%Charity Water: $1k → 17%Charity Water: $1k → 17%Charity Water: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
NV
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$494k · 61 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

61 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
14

Total granted

$494k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $48k · revenue ×34
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +98%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    5× · 2019–2024 · $20k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • NR
    NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • DW
    Doctors WO Borders
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • A
    ALS
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
4
Watttime Corporation

To raise awareness about the potential to reduce environmental harm by shifting electricity use to particular times; to encourage the development and spread of common protocols for this practice.

Science & Tech
5
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
6
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
The Alliance for Just Deliberation On Solar Geoengineering Inc

The alliance for just deliberation on solar geoengineering (dsg) is a charitable, scientific and educational organization dedicated to building just and inclusive deliberation about research and potential use of solar geoengineering. solar…

Environment
11
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sierra Club Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Brooklyn Music School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/47
Grantees still filing
37/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $34,000 · OtherNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATIONBAY AREA TUMOR INSTITUTE: $30,052 · OtherBAY AREA TUMOR INSTITUTEMountain Area Preservation Foundation: $15,000 · OtherMountain Area Preservation FoundationBrooklyn School of Music: $15,000 · OtherBrooklyn School of MusicBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $13,000 · OtherGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $17,900 · OtherGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC+43 more: $124,200 · Other+43 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $47,750 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $30,200 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA …DIRECT RELIEF: $20,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONALOPERATION SMILE INC: $8,500 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INCHIAS INC: $6,000 · InternationalKIVA MICROFUNDS: $5,500 · InternationalEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $15,700 · Crime & LegalTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $12,500 · Crime & LegalBROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalTRUCKEE ROUNDHOUSE: $7,250 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $6,600 · Arts & CultureUNITY EARTH INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureBerkeley Playhouse Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF WWOZ INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureEAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureEARTHJUSTICE: $14,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA NEVADA ALLIANCE: $5,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA WATCH: $4,500 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EnvironmentSierra Watershed Education Partnerships: $2,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $16,500 · EducationCOMMUNITY ROOTS CHARTER SCHOOL: $7,000 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · Health
Other$249,152International$132,950Crime & Legal$33,200Arts & Culture$30,350Environment$28,500Education$23,500Health$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $47,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $34,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $30,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA TUMOR INSTITUTE: $30,052 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $17,900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $16,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $15,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMountain Area Preservation Foundation: $15,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $12,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUCKEE ROUNDHOUSE: $7,250 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ROOTS CHARTER SCHOOL: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $6,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOAKLAND WOMENS ROWING CLUB: $6,500 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetHIAS INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA SENIOR SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS TAHOE: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNITY EARTH INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSIERRA NEVADA ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA WATCH: $4,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBerkeley Playhouse Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSKI FOR LIGHT INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTRINITY COMMUNITY CONNECTION INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF WWOZ INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSierra Watershed Education Partnerships: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBAY AREA RESCUE MISSION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBrooklyn Music School Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS CLIMATE LOBBY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVITY EXPLORED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA TUMOR INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Area Preservation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUCKEE ROUNDHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ROOTS CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND WOMENS ROWING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA SENIOR SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS TAHOE ↗
  • Who funds UNITY EARTH INC ↗
  • Who funds KIVA MICROFUNDS ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA NEVADA ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA WATCH ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Berkeley Playhouse Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tahoe Truckee Community FoundationCA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tahoe Truckee Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ann & Gordon Getty Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Marin Community Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Anderson Fund Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Anderson Fund Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Anderson Fund Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Anderson Fund Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anderson’s filings →

More from the funding graph