Skip to content
The Amy Marie Crabtree Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Amy Marie Crabtree Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Health$32kAnimals$28kHuman Services$23kYouth Development$15kHousing & Shelter$9kFood & Nutrition$8kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANCISCAN CHARITIES$5,000
CATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD SANCTUARY$5,000
SPCA WESTCHESTER$2,500
FRIENDS OF KAREN$2,500
HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FOUNDATION INC$2,000
MAKE-A-WISH HUDSON VALLEY$2,000
KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART$2,000
ANN'S PLACE$2,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB NORTHERN WESTCHESTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHICAGO HOPE: $3k → 14%CHICAGO HOPE: $3k → 14%ANN'S PLACE: $3k → 9%ANNS PLACE: $2k → 9%ANN'S PLACE: $2k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILDCARE CENTER: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$93k · 10 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$93k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+14%

Still filing today

60%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER
    4× · 2020–2023 · $11k · revenue +15%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +74%
  • SO
    SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSNgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +85%
  • TC
    THE CATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MK
    MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westchester Jewish Community Services Inc

Westchester jewish community services (wjcs) is a non-sectarian, not for profit, broad based human service agency dedicated to helping people of all ages cope with emotional, cognitive, environmental, physical, social, and educational…

Health
2
Wmc-New York Inc

Wmc new york, inc. shall at all times be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the code, and for the purpose of engaging in various activities…

Health
3
The County Chamber of Commerce

The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.

—
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Metro New York and Western New York

Together, we create life changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
6
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
7
Alternatives for Children

To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.

—
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Suffolk County Ny Inc

The make-a-wish foundation of suffolk county, ny creates life changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
10
Westchester Childrens Museum

The westchester children's museum is a vibrant, interactive learning space, learning laboratory providing children, families and school groups the opportunity to nurture curiosity, enhance knowledge and ignite imagination through creative…

Arts & Culture
11
Wamc

Wamc is chartered by the new york state board of regents to "furnish, prepare and present non-profit and non-commercial educational, instructional and cultural radio programs and also non-profit and non-commercial programs (wamc's mission…

Arts & Culture
12
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Hudson Valley; the most unlike its peers is Chicago Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRANCISCAN CHARITIES: $20,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN CHARITIESCATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD SANCTUARY: $12,500 · OtherCATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD SANCTUARYMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $9,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEYHOPES DOOR WOMENS SHELTER: $9,000 · OtherHOPES DOOR WOMENS SHELTERTHE CATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5,000 · OtherTHE CATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD ANIMAL SANCTUARYMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION: $4,000 · OtherMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATIONROAR ANIMAL SHELTER: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $2,500 · Other+1 more: $2,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $7,500 · HealthFRIENDS OF KAR…AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $5,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LA…THE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FDTN INC: $2,000 · HealthTHE HONORABLE …MAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · HealthMAKING HEADWAY…ANNS PLACE INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesANNS PLACE IN…CHICAGO HOPE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCHICAGO HOPE …MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $2,500 · Human ServicesMOUNT KISCO C…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER: $10,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $8,000 · AnimalsKATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $2,000 · Arts & CultureARTSWESTCHESTER INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$69,500Health$16,000Human Services$14,000Youth Development$10,500Animals$8,000Arts & Culture$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER: $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $9,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANNS PLACE INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARTSWESTCHESTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FDTN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJandon FoundationThe Thomas and Agnes …Pcsb Community Founda…Peckham Family Founda…The Bank of America C…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…The Pfizer Foundation…Vanguard Charitable E…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…
Jewish Communal FundNY13.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jandon Foundation · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Pcsb Community Foundation · Peckham Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Amy Marie Crabtree Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Amy Marie Crabtree Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Amy Marie Crabtree Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Amy Marie Crabtree Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Amy Marie Crabtree’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home