Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Amy Marie Crabtree Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Health$32kAnimals$28kHuman Services$23kYouth Development$15kHousing & Shelter$9kFood & Nutrition$8kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD SANCTUARY$5,000
FRANCISCAN CHARITIES$5,000
SPCA WESTCHESTER$2,500
FRIENDS OF KAREN$2,500
HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FOUNDATION INC$2,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB NORTHERN WESTCHESTER$2,000
MAKE-A-WISH HUDSON VALLEY$2,000
KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART$2,000
ANN'S PLACE$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHICAGO HOPE: $3k → 14%CHICAGO HOPE: $3k → 14%ANN'S PLACE: $3k → 9%ANNS PLACE: $2k → 9%ANN'S PLACE: $2k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILDCARE CENTER: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$93k · 10 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$93k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+14%

Still filing today

60%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER
    4× · 2020–2023 · $11k · revenue +15%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +74%
  • SO
    SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • AL
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSNgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +85%
  • TC
    THE CATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westchester Jewish Community Services Inc

Westchester jewish community services (wjcs) is a non-sectarian, not for profit, broad based human service agency dedicated to helping people of all ages cope with emotional, cognitive, environmental, physical, social, and educational…

Health
2
Wmc-New York Inc

Wmc new york, inc. shall at all times be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the code, and for the purpose of engaging in various activities…

Health
3
The County Chamber of Commerce

The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.

4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Metro New York and Western New York

Together, we create life changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

6
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
7
Alternatives for Children

To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.

8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Suffolk County Ny Inc

The make-a-wish foundation of suffolk county, ny creates life changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

10
Westchester Childrens Museum

The westchester children's museum is a vibrant, interactive learning space, learning laboratory providing children, families and school groups the opportunity to nurture curiosity, enhance knowledge and ignite imagination through creative…

Arts & Culture
11
Wamc

Wamc is chartered by the new york state board of regents to "furnish, prepare and present non-profit and non-commercial educational, instructional and cultural radio programs and also non-profit and non-commercial programs (wamc's mission…

Arts & Culture
12
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Hudson Valley and the most unlike its peers is Chicago Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRANCISCAN CHARITIES — $20,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN CHARITIESCATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD SANCTUARY — $12,500 · OtherCATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD SANCTUARYMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY — $9,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEYHOPES DOOR WOMENS SHELTER — $9,000 · OtherHOPES DOOR WOMENS SHELTERTHE CATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $5,000 · OtherTHE CATHERINE VIOLET HUBBARD ANIMAL SANCTUARYMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION — $4,000 · OtherMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $2,500 · OtherROAR ANIMAL SHELTER — $2,500 · Other+1 more — $2,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF KAREN INC — $7,500 · HealthFRIENDS OF KAR…AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $5,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LA…THE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FDTN INC — $2,000 · HealthTHE HONORABLE …MAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 · HealthMAKING HEADWAY…ANNS PLACE INC — $6,500 · Human ServicesANNS PLACE IN…CHICAGO HOPE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesCHICAGO HOPE …MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER — $2,500 · Human ServicesMOUNT KISCO C…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER — $10,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC — $8,000 · AnimalsKATONAH MUSEUM OF ART — $2,000 · Arts & CultureARTSWESTCHESTER INC — $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$69,500Health$16,000Human Services$14,000Youth Development$10,500Animals$8,000Arts & Culture$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER — $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY — $9,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC — $7,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANNS PLACE INC — $6,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKATONAH MUSEUM OF ART — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARTSWESTCHESTER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FDTN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jandon Foundation · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Pcsb Community Foundation · Peckham Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Amy Marie Crabtree Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Amy Marie Crabtree Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Amy Marie Crabtree Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph