Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Alexander S Alacche Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Philanthropy$313kHealth$173kHuman Services$109kHousing & Shelter$70kEducation$64kAnimals$54kInternational$34kCivil Rights$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $118k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY TUSTIN RANCH CORP$14,000
WHITTIER COLLEGE$12,000
CARE HARBOR$12,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOC$10,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOC$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS SO ORANGE COUNTY$10,000
VETERANS OF FOREGIN WARS$10,000
AMERICAN CANCER ASSOCIATION$10,000
NORTH COUNTY LGBTQ RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
PET PROJET FOUNDATION$10,000
OCGBT CENTER$10,000
MERCY HOUSE$7,600
OC CENTRAL OFFICE ALCOHOLICS ANONYM$6,000
TURNING POINT USA$6,000
CASH FOR HOMELESS$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
MI
NY
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of The Alexander S Alacche Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Alexander S Alacche Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$578k · 34 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
20

Total granted

$578k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+5%

Still filing today

41%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PET PROJECT FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $29k · revenue +229%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $16k · revenue +89%
  • MH
    MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS
    3× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • NV
    NORTHERN VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • P
    PIERPRIDEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +36%
  • PF
    POINT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
4
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

5
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
Palo Alto University Inc

Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science

Education
11
The Anti-Recidivism Coalition

The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…

Crime & Legal
12
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy House Living Centers and the most unlike its peers is Whittier College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr16%4%5–10yr21%28%10–20yr18%24%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr12%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr16%1%5–10yr21%20%10–20yr18%52%20–35yr11%5%35–55yr12%22%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
14%
14,205/100,030

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHWAB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $95,000 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONOC CENTRAL OFFICE ALCOHOLICS ANONYM — $29,300 · OtherOC CENTRAL OFFICE ALCOHOLICS ANONYMVARIOUS HOMELESS ASSISTANCE — $24,400 · OtherSALVATION ARMY TUSTIN RANCH CORPS — $23,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS ORANGE COUNTY — $22,200 · OtherAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION - OC — $21,000 · OtherREMOTE AREA MEDICAL FNDN — $20,200 · OtherNORTH OC LGBTQ RESOURCE CTR — $18,000 · Other+43 more — $273,993 · Other+43 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $217,724 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE …CARE HARBOR — $43,400 · HealthCARE HARB…AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · HealthAMERICAN …ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY — $10,700 · HealthALZHEIMER…American Heart Association Inc — $7,000 · HealthAmerican …+1 more — $2,000 · HealthWhittier College — $49,300 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,700 · EducationPOINT FOUNDATION — $3,500 · EducationPET PROJECT FOUNDATION INC — $29,200 · AnimalsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $16,300 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $2,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $2,000 · InternationalSOUTH COAST REPERTORY INC — $7,500 · Arts & CulturePIERPRIDE — $5,000 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO MUSICAL THEATRE — $4,200 · Arts & CultureCITY BALLET INC — $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$527,093Philanthropy$217,724Health$83,100Education$63,500Animals$29,200International$20,300Arts & Culture$18,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $217,724 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWhittier College — $49,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCARE HARBOR — $43,400 over 7y, 9.2% of budgetPET PROJECT FOUNDATION INC — $29,200 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $16,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS — $14,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS — $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY — $10,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH COAST REPERTORY INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIERPRIDE — $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $4,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STEPPING STONE OF SAN DIEGO — $4,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO MUSICAL THEATRE — $4,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER PROVIDERS OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC — $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANNING HUNGER INC — $1,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds Whittier College
  • Who funds CARE HARBOR
  • Who funds PET PROJECT FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSE LIVING CENTERS
  • Who funds ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds North County LGBTQ Resource Center
  • Who funds SOUTH COAST REPERTORY INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds PIERPRIDE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA19.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · Argyros Family Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Alexander S Alacche Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Alexander S Alacche Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Alexander S Alacche Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph