Skip to content
The Albert Pick Jr Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

The Albert Pick Jr Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
54
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.4MHealth$1.0MYouth Development$940kEducation$923kPhilanthropy$745kHuman Services$675kCommunity Improvement$670kCivil Rights$633kOther$0
02FY2024 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k53 grants · $940k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$17,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY TRUST$75,000
CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$35,000
CHICAGO UNITED FOR EQUITY$30,000
CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$30,000
RESTORE JUSTICE FOUNDATION$25,000
SOUTHSIDE TOGETHER ORGANIZING FOR POWER$25,000
CROSSROADS FUND$25,000
SOUTHSIDERS ORGANIZED FOR UNITY AND LIBERATION$25,000
TARGET HOPE$20,000
LATIN UNION INC$20,000
CHICAGO COALITION TO SAVE OUR MENTAL HEALTH CENTER$20,000
KUUMBA LYNX$20,000
TERRITORY NFP$20,000
ARAB AMERICAN ACTION NETWORK$20,000
CENTRO DE TRABAJADORES UNIDOS UNITED WORKERS CENTE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Alliance of the SouthEast: $20k → 14%Juvenile Protective Association: $25k → 14%Alliance of the SouthEast: $20k → 14%Juvenile Protective Association: $25k → 14%Alliance of the SouthEast: $20k → 14%Juvenile Protective Association: $25k → 14%Juvenile Protective Association: $25k → 14%Juvenile Protective Association: $20k → 14%JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%Metropolitan Family Services: $20k → 14%Friends of the Children - Chicago: $20k → 14%LATIN UNION INC: $20k → 14%Latino Union of Chicago: $20k → 14%Latino Union of Chicago: $20k → 14%Hamdard Center for Health and Human Services: $15k → 14%FATHERS FAMILIES HEALTHY COMMUNITIES: $20k → 14%FATHERS FAMILIES HEALTHY COMMUNITIES: $15k → 14%Family Rescue: $25k → 14%Family Rescue: $25k → 14%Family Rescue: $25k → 14%Family Rescue: $25k → 14%Alliance of the SouthEast: $25k → 14%ALLIANCE OF THE SOUTHEAST: $20k → 14%CENTRO DE TRABAJADORES UNIDOS UNITED WORKERS CENTE: $20k → 14%Latino Union of Chicago: $20k → 14%Latino Union of Chicago: $20k → 14%Alliance of the SouthEast: $20k → 14%Latino Union of Chicago: $20k → 14%Family Rescue: $20k → 14%Indo-American Center: $15k → 14%Indo-American Center: $15k → 14%INDO AMERICAN CENTER INC: $15k → 14%HANA Center: $25k → 14%Tuesday's Child: $25k → 14%Tuesday's Child: $25k → 14%Tuesday's Child: $25k → 14%Tuesday's Child: $25k → 14%Tuesday's Child: $15k → 14%TUESDAYS CHILD: $15k → 14%New Moms Inc: $25k → 14%New Moms Inc: $25k → 14%Connection for Abused Women & Their Children: $20k → 14%Connections for Abused Women and their Children: $20k → 14%New Moms Inc: $15k → 14%CONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN: $15k → 14%Friends of the Children-Chicago: $20k → 14%Friends of the Children-Chicago: $20k → 14%Northwest Side Housing Center: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.5M · 106 repeat orgs$886k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +55% for those funded once.

106 repeat relationships: 49 still active in FY2024, 57 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

106
53

Total granted

$7.5M
$851k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+55%

Still filing today

88%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KL
    KUUMBA LYNX
    7× · 2018–2024 · $145k · revenue +183%
  • JP
    JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $135k · revenue +210%
  • PC
    Plant Chicago NFP
    6× · 2018–2023 · $128k · revenue +255%

Funded once

  • AW
    Arts Work Fund for Organizational Development
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • IC
    Interfaith Community Detained Immigrants
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • UW
    United Way Metropolitan Chicago
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
2
Chicago Votes

Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…

Civil Rights
3
Chicago Refugee Coalition

The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.

Human Services
4
Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for

Providing academic support to children experiencing homelessness in Chicago and providing resources and services to families experiencing homelessness in Chicago.

Education
5
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
6
Chicago Torture Justice Center

Seeks to address the traumas of police violence and institutionalized racism through access to healing and wellness services, trauma-informed resources, and community connection. The Center is a part of and supports a movement to end all…

Crime & Legal
7
Students Run Chicago
Health
8
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
9
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
10
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
11
Children's Advocates for Change

Children's advocates for change was organized to improve the lives of children in illinois by bringing about significant changes public policies and programs for children through research, policy analysis and advocacy, public education and…

Human Services
12
Chicago Cultural Alliance

The Chicago Cultural Alliances mission is to connect, promote, and support centers of cultural heritage for a more inclusive Chicago. We are an active consortium of 50 cultural heritage museums, centers, and historical societies that…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Firehouse Community Arts Center of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

131 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 131 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
67
Early backer (in before they grew)
128/131
Grantees still filing
100/131
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $595,000 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+85 more: $3,864,964 · Other+85 moreJUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $135,000 · Human ServicesJUVENILE PROTEC…Tuesdays Child: $130,000 · Human ServicesTuesdays ChildAlianza Leadership Institute: $125,000 · Human ServicesAlianza Leaders…FAMILY RESCUE INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESCUE I…Latino Union of Chicago: $120,000 · Human ServicesLatino Union of…CONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN: $72,500 · Human ServicesCONNECTIONS FOR…FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $70,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE …NEW MOMS INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesNEW MOMS INCIndo-American Center: $57,000 · Human ServicesOPTIONS FOR YOUTH: $45,000 · Human Services+8 more: $195,000 · Human Services+8 moreTarget Hope: $120,000 · EducationTarget Hop…CHICAGO FREEDOM SCHOOL: $95,000 · EducationCHICAGO FR…THE CHICAGO DEBATE COMMISSION: $95,000 · EducationTHE CHICAG…PROJECT SYNCERE: $70,000 · EducationPROJECT SY…WORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC: $60,000 · EducationWORKING IN…PRIMO CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $50,000 · EducationPRIMO CENT…DISABILITY LEAD: $50,000 · EducationDISABILITY…GIRLS 4 SCIENCE: $45,000 · EducationGIRLS 4 SC…CHICAGO PRE-COLLEGE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRAM: $40,000 · EducationRAISE YOUR HAND FOR ILLINOIS PUBLIC EDUCATION: $40,000 · EducationWE ALL CODE: $30,000 · Education+7 more: $105,000 · Education+7 moreKUUMBA LYNX: $145,000 · Arts & CultureKUUMBA LY…PROJECT EXPLORATION: $85,000 · Arts & CulturePROJECT E…Territory NFP: $80,000 · Arts & CultureTerritory…Latinos Progresando: $75,000 · Arts & CultureLatinos P…SNOW CITY ARTS FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Arts & CultureSNOW CITY…READING IN MOTION: $60,000 · Arts & CultureREADING I…Red Line Service Institute: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO SINFONIETTA INC: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more: $115,000 · Arts & Culture+8 moreTHE EXPERIMENTAL STATION: $110,000 · Community ImprovementSouthside Together Organizing For Power: $100,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES: $95,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITIES UNITED: $95,000 · Community ImprovementLogan Square Neighborhood Association: $75,000 · Community ImprovementKenwood Oakland Community Organization: $45,000 · Community ImprovementBRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL: $30,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $15,000 · Community ImprovementTFK Chicago Voyagers: $105,500 · Youth DevelopmentArab American Action Network: $95,000 · Youth DevelopmentLIVING WORKS: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentINTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS MEDIA CENTER: $59,100 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INC OF CHICAGO: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT VISION INC: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentLADIES OF VIRTUE: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BROWN HOUSE EXPERIENCE INC: $20,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentMother and Child Alliance: $80,000 · HealthMOBILE CARE FOUNDATION: $80,000 · HealthCHICAGO COALITION TO SAVE OUR MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS: $80,000 · HealthLa Rabida Children's Hospital: $60,000 · HealthHEALTH AND MEDICINE POLICY RESEARCH GROUP: $53,000 · HealthJULIE AND MICHAEL TRACY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthPILOT LIGHT: $15,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · Health
Other$4,459,964Human Services$1,134,500Education$800,000Arts & Culture$680,000Community Improvement$565,000Youth Development$459,600Health$428,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKUUMBA LYNX: $145,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetStorycatchers: $135,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetJUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $135,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetTuesdays Child: $130,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetPlant Chicago NFP: $128,000 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetChicago United for Equity: $125,000 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetAlianza Leadership Institute: $125,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetTarget Hope: $120,000 over 6y, 9.4% of budgetCHICAGO WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER: $120,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetFAMILY RESCUE INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetLatino Union of Chicago: $120,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetCHICAGO YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $115,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetMATH CIRCLES OF CHICAGO: $115,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetTHE EXPERIMENTAL STATION: $110,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTFK Chicago Voyagers: $105,500 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetNATIONAL VIETNAM VETERANS ART MUSEUM DBA NATIONAL VETERANS ART MUSEUM: $105,000 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetSouthside Together Organizing For Power: $100,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetYOUNG INVINCIBLES: $100,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGilloury Institute: $100,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetCROSSROADS FUND INC: $95,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO FREEDOM SCHOOL: $95,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO DEBATE COMMISSION: $95,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES: $95,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetArab American Action Network: $95,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetCOMMUNITIES UNITED: $95,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESEARCH TRIANGLE: $95,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetThe Chicago Community Trust: $95,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEEONE: $90,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $90,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetARISE CHICAGO: $90,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetRESTORE JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetOrganizing Neighborhoods For Equality Northside: $85,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetPROJECT EXPLORATION: $85,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetTerritory NFP: $80,000 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetMother and Child Alliance: $80,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMOBILE CARE FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO SAVE OUR MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS: $80,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetLatinos Progresando: $75,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $75,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetLogan Square Neighborhood Association: $75,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCHANGING WORLDS: $72,500 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN: $72,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CHICAGO: $70,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetPROJECT SYNCERE: $70,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetHarmony Hope & Healing: $69,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetNEW MOMS INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLIVING WORKS: $60,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetFIFTH HOUSE ENSEMBLE: $60,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KUUMBA LYNX ↗
  • Who funds Storycatchers ↗
  • Who funds JUVENILE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Tuesdays Child ↗
  • Who funds Plant Chicago NFP ↗
  • Who funds Chicago United for Equity ↗
  • Who funds Alianza Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds Target Hope ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Latino Union of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds MATH CIRCLES OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE EXPERIMENTAL STATION ↗
  • Who funds TFK Chicago Voyagers ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL VIETNAM VETERANS ART MUSEUM DBA NATIONAL VETERANS ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Southside Together Organizing For Power ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG INVINCIBLES ↗
  • Who funds Gilloury Institute ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO FREEDOM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO DEBATE COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES ↗
  • Who funds Arab American Action Network ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES UNITED ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S RESEARCH TRIANGLE ↗
  • Who funds The Chicago Community Trust ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEEONE ↗
  • Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds ARISE CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Organizing Neighborhoods For Equality Northside ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT EXPLORATION ↗
  • Who funds Territory NFP ↗
  • Who funds Mother and Child Alliance ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO SAVE OUR MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds Latinos Progresando ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Polk Bros Foundation …United Way of Metropo…Field Foundation of I…The Chicago Community…Chicago Foundation fo…John D and Catherine …Robert R McCormick Fo…Arie and Ida Crown Me…Lloyd a Fry FoundationWoods Fund of ChicagoCircle of Service Fou…Crossroads Fund Inc
Polk Bros Foundation IncIL123.2× affinity63 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Field Foundation of Illinois · The Chicago Community Trust · Chicago Foundation for Women · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Woods Fund of Chicago · Circle of Service Foundation · Crossroads Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Albert Pick Jr Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Albert Pick Jr Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    59report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Albert Pick Jr Fund?

    Find your warmest path to The Albert Pick Jr Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 163 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Albert Pick Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home