Skip to content
The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

82% of The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’20
4
’21
4
’22
2
’23
4
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$252kPhilanthropy$125kHuman Services$50kEducation$29kHealth$23kInternational$19kYouth Development$10kRecreation & Sports$1k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$880k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$75,000
TRINA S KIDS FOUNDATION$10,000
SUPPLIES FOR SUCCESS INC$5,000
VILLA MUSICA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SUPPLIES FOR SUCCESS INC: $5k → 17%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
PA
RI
CA
UT
DE
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
2
Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa)

The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.

Food & Nutrition
3
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
4
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
5
Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.

International
6
Foundation for International Medical Relief of Children

To provide healthcare access to children, families and communities internationally.

Philanthropy
7
Fund for the Global Fund

To encourage individuals, corporations, foundations and donor governments to support the global fund, an international foundation focused on ending three of the world's most deadly infectious diseases.

Human Services
8
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
9
Yours Humanly

Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…

Education
10
GIVE2ASIA

Give2asia provides philanthropic services to individuals, foundations, corporations and charitable organizations in the united states and asia. give2asia matches donor interests and grantee mission and capacity to make international…

International
11
Sankara Eye Foundation Usa

To work towards eradicating curable blindness all over india. our key program is vision 20/20 - with the goal of performing 500,000 free surgeries per year throughout india. we have been primarily partnering with sankara eye foundation in…

Health
12
Childrens Global Health Fund Inc

Saving lives of vulnerable children and families globally.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund; the most unlike its peers is Homestay Teachers Volunteer Organization Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUR RESCUE: $250,000 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUE+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $125,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARIT…PACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL: $26,000 · EducationTorrey Pines High School Foundation Inc: $2,500 · EducationHELPUSADOPTORG INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSUPPLIES FOR SUCCESS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesEMINAS HAND FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherCUREBOUND: $10,000 · HealthBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc: $6,580 · HealthChopra Foundation: $5,000 · HealthTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthJUST LIKE MY CHILD FOUNDATION: $15,000 · InternationalHOMESTAY TEACHERS VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION INC: $1,972 · InternationalEMBRACE GLOBAL: $1,000 · InternationalAROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD: $1,000 · InternationalTrinas Kids Foundation: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$251,500Community Improvement$125,000Education$28,500Human Services$26,000Other$25,000Health$22,580International$18,972Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOUR RESCUE: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC RIDGE SCHOOL: $26,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELPUSADOPTORG INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJUST LIKE MY CHILD FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCUREBOUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc: $6,580 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChopra Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTorrey Pines High School Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOMESTAY TEACHERS VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION INC: $1,972 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVILLA MUSICA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMBRACE GLOBAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…The Pfizer Foundation…Morgan Stanley Global…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ajay Silvia Connor Natalia Anjali Gupta Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home