Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Adorjan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$69kEnvironment$62kEducation$39kHealth$30kArts & Culture$23kRecreation & Sports$11kInternational$7kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$136k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROSATI-KAIN ACADEMY$35,000
GRATITUDE HOUSE$25,000
GRAND CENTER ARTS ACADEMY$5,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF MO$5,000
WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF ST LOUIS$2,500
MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDENS$1,000
SHOW ME INSTITUTE$1,000
FOREST PARK FOREVER$1,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$500
ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM$500
NINE PBS$500
ANIMAL PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 9%WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $1k → 21%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%FEED MY PEOPLE: $100 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%FEED MY PEOPLE: $100 → 9%SAFE CONNECTIONS: $150 → 21%FEED MY PEOPLE: $100 → 9%SAFE CONNECTIONS: $150 → 21%SAFE CONNECTIONS: $100 → 21%SAFE CONNECTIONS: $100 → 21%SAFE CONNECTIONS: $100 → 21%WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $100 → 21%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $250 → 21%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $250 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AR
DC
OK
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$215k · 81 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

81 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 70 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
33

Total granted

$215k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+74%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +11%
  • FP
    Forest Park Forever Inc
    6× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +213%
  • SR
    Stray Rescue of St Louis
    5× · 2017–2023 · $5k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • BA
    BARC ANIMAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -40%
  • SM
    ST MARY VICTORIES CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
4
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
5
Jefferson National Parks Association

Jefferson national parks association provides quality educational products and related services that enhance public understanding and appreciation of america's national parks, public lands and historic places.

Arts & Culture
6
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
7
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
8
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
9
African Parks Foundation of America

To engage the united states and its citizens in the work of african parks and to promote access to american experience and expertise in the african parks actiities by 1) raising funds for specific projects, activities, training, equipment…

Recreation & Sports
10
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
11
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
12
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees; the most unlike its peers is Gratitude House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/60
Grantees still filing
51/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LOUIS ZOO FRIENDS: $42,900 · OtherST LOUIS ZOO FRIENDSNATURE CONSERVANCY OF MO: $25,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY OF MOTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY-MISSOURI: $20,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY-MISSOURIBARC ANIMAL CENTER: $10,000 · OtherBARC ANIMAL CENTERGRAND CENTER ARTS ACADEMY: $6,000 · Other+73 more: $41,120 · Other+73 moreRosati-Kain Academy: $37,500 · EducationRosati-Kain Acad…+1 more: $1,250 · EducationGRATITUDE HOUSE INC: $25,000 · HealthGRATITUDE H…+4 more: $900 · HealthMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $11,500 · EnvironmentForest Park Forever Inc: $6,000 · Environment+6 more: $2,550 · EnvironmentStray Rescue of St Louis: $4,850 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $1,675 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,360 · AnimalsST LOUIS METROPOLITAN SPAY NEUTER AND WELLNESS CENTER INC: $1,350 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC: $1,050 · AnimalsANIMAL PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI: $900 · AnimalsWildlife Rescue Center: $800 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $535 · AnimalsJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $500 · Animals+7 more: $1,805 · AnimalsWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF ST LOUIS: $4,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,750 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 · InternationalMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,825 · Arts & CultureCONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $950 · Arts & CultureST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $800 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $200 · Arts & Culture
Other$145,020Education$38,750Health$25,900Environment$20,050Animals$14,825International$7,250Arts & Culture$6,775

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRosati-Kain Academy: $37,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGRATITUDE HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $11,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetStray Rescue of St Louis: $4,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF ST LOUIS: $4,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetGATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,825 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS: $2,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $1,675 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,360 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS METROPOLITAN SPAY NEUTER AND WELLNESS CENTER INC: $1,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND HOUSING INC: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $1,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI: $900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Rescue Center: $800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMissouri Prairie Foundation: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE CONNECTIONS: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $535 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER ST LOUIS ARTS AND EDUCATION COUNCIL: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Sisters of The Poor: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $480 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI PARKS ASSOCIATION: $400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOZARK REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC DBA OZARK LAND TRUST: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD BIRD SANCTUARY: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAT SHELTER: $300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSERVANCY: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rosati-Kain Academy ↗
  • Who funds GRATITUDE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds Stray Rescue of St Louis ↗
  • Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS METROPOLITAN SPAY NEUTER AND WELLNESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOW-ME INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Rescue Center ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO41.9× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · The Kranzberg Family Charitable Foundation · Washington University

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Adorjan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Adorjan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Friends of Rookery Bay Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Adorjan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph