· Private foundation
The Aber D Unger Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $288k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROPUBLICA | $75,000 |
| FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE | $45,000 |
| EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND | $30,000 |
| ARTS FOR LEARNING MARYLAND | $30,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA | $25,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE HIGHLINE | $20,000 |
| TRACE MEDIA | $20,000 |
| AL OTRO LADO | $18,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $15,000 |
| OGUNQUIT MUSEUM OF THE ARTS | $15,000 |
| PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION | $10,001 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| AMICA CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS | $10,000 |
| DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| RAW TRUST - INGOMA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Teach for America Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $130k · revenue +5%
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC5× · 2021–2025 · $130k · revenue +28%
PRO PUBLICA INC5× · 2021–2025 · $123k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- MAMARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONSone grant, 2023 · $27k · revenue +3%
- OSOPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE - BALTIMOREone grant, 2022 · $25k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMOREone grant, 2022 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
The forum advocates for the value of immigrants and immigration to the nation. from a diversity of perspectives, the forum uses communication, advocacy and policy to create a vision, concensus and strategy to lead to a better, more…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Democracy Forward Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds TRACE MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC ↗
- Who funds AL OTRO LADO ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS FOR LEARNING MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds PROJECT PNEUMA INC ↗
- Who funds The Hampden Family Center Inc ↗
- Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE INNOVATION INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Upstream USA Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Foundation · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · David & Barbara B Hirschhorn Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Wolman Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Aber D Unger Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
- Maryland Association of Non-Profit Organizations — 27% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
- The American Visionary Art Museum Inc — 6% of income from government
- Upstream Usa Inc — 4% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
- Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
- Arts for Learning Maryland Inc — 1% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.