· Private foundation
The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS | $6,824,104 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SUSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY2× · 2020–2021 · $2.2M · revenue +21%
- GHGEISINGER HEALTH2× · 2020–2021 · $604k · revenue +118%
- GSGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCA2× · 2020–2021 · $425k · revenue +93%
Funded once
- ECEVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITALgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $498k · revenue +28%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $252k
- NCNORTHUMBERLAND COUNCIL FOR ARTSone grant, 2020 · $210k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Public lending library
Public lending library
Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.
Public lending library
To provide educational, informational, cultural, and recreational services to the public. services are provided in bethlehem, pennsylvania and its supporting communities.
The mission of the adamstown library is to maintain and improve the quality of life in our community by providing access to cultural, intellectual, and informational resources and programs to promote life-long learning for all ages. the…
Public lending library
The joseph t. simpson library is the community's library, responsive to needs and desires for knowledge, understanding, enrichment, entertainment, and connection.
Public lending library
Public lending library
The mission of lycoming college is to provide a distinguished baccalaureate education in the liberal arts and sciences within a coeducational, supportive, and residential setting.
A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Susquehanna Valley United Way and the most unlike its peers is Fetherston Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GEISINGER HEALTH ↗
- Who funds EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Greater Susquehanna Valley YMCA ↗
- Who funds WYOMING SEMINARY COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds SELINSGROVE AREA RECREATION INC ↗
- Who funds A COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds THE BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds HANDUP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds DONALD L HEITER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Bucknell University ↗
- Who funds THE ARC SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds JOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC LIBRARY FOR UNION COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNION COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ZONE ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · Degenstein Charitable Foundation · Community Giving Foundation · Degenstein Charles B Fdn-Char Tr · Ppl Foundation · Guyer Foundation · Fern & Gladys Moyer Memorial Trust · 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Seiple Family Foundation · Sunbury Northumberland Commtr · Susquehanna Valley United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Chesapeake Conservancy Inc — 27% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn?
Find your warmest path to The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.