Pennsylvania · Nonprofit
THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE
THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $658,870 to it, the largest being MILTON MOOSE LODGE 171 ($546,191). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 11,946 community improvement nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,946 community improvement nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Sunbury Area Community Foundationlocal
- The Riley Foundationportfolio match
- Mississippi Humanities Council Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2023 50% · 2024 70%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
95% of THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (62% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell $104k → $74k.
From the IRS filings of THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 83% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
84% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 96% · 2018 98% · 2019 100% · 2020 78% · 2021 61% · 2022 100% · 2023 95% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
50% of THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 40% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
98% of THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE's grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 10 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Sunbury Area Community FoundationlocalPA · funds 8 organizations near you
- The Riley Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mississippi Humanities Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Alabama Humanities Allianceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mississippi Delta National Heritage Area Partnership Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Washington County Tourism Promotion Agencyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Jefferson National Parks Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Humanities Tennesseeportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Cawaco Resource Conservation & Development Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Stender Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United Statesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- S Luther Savidge Charitable Trust 017775localPA · funds 8 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Pennsylvania
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
87% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE?
- THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $658,870 to it, the largest being MILTON MOOSE LODGE 171 ($546,191). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE have?
- IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $658,870 in grants to THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE?
- MILTON MOOSE LODGE 171 is the largest funder on record, with $546,191 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 10funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing