Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$117k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
23
Grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
14%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,400
Largest grant, FY2025
$16,200
Organizations funded a year
5 to 17
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$2.0M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 14% of the organizations 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 70% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving21$117k19%
FY20247$95k14%
FY202316$117k19%
FY202215$121k33%
FY202117$96k24%
FY202017$91k29%
FY201912$87k42%
FY20185$42k20%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$490kRecreation & Sports$109kHealth$78kHuman Services$74kYouth Development$49kPhilanthropy$22kArts & Culture$3kCommunity Improvement$3k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 25 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 13 recipients with no EIN on record ($223k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 20 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJohn R Kauffman Jr Public Library: $98,812 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetShikellamy Braves Foundation: $70,900 over 2y, 36% of budgetA Community Clinic: $61,500 over 5y, 13% of budgetPriestley Forsyth Memorial Library: $52,012 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetShamokin-Coal Township Public Library Inc: $40,162 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCA: $39,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSnyder County Libraries Inc: $29,100 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetWest End Library Inc: $25,162 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetJane and Annette M Herr Memorial Library: $25,162 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetThomas Beaver Free Library: $24,062 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetMilton Public Library: $20,424 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetMontgomery House Inc: $17,562 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetSusquehanna Valley United Way: $16,750 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMt Carmel Public Library Inc: $16,400 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetUS Kids Golf Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRalpho Township Public Library: $10,500 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetCentral Susquehanna Sight Services: $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetDanville Area Community Center: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWilliam J and Ann M Roll Foundation: $5,950 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetThe Arc Susquehanna Valley: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The 1994 Charles B Degenstein FdnPA32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn · Degenstein Charitable Foundation · Community Giving Foundation · First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · Ppl Foundation · Fern & Gladys Moyer Memorial Trust · Guyer Foundation · Seiple Family Foundation · Sunbury Northumberland Commtr · Degenstein Charles B Fdn-Char Tr · S Luther Savidge Trust · The John and Barbara Pagana Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation?

Find your warmest path to 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation

How much does 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation give?
2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation reported 23 grants totaling $116,700 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 17 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (59%), Recreation & Sports (13%), Health (9%).
Who are 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: John R Kauffman Jr Public Library ($99k), Shikellamy Braves Foundation ($71k), A Community Clinic ($62k).
Does 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn, Degenstein Charitable Foundation, Community Giving Foundation.
Where is 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation based?
2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 2006 Edward S Rosenblum’s filings →

More from the funding graph