Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$490kRecreation & Sports$109kHealth$78kHuman Services$74kYouth Development$49kPhilanthropy$22kArts & Culture$3kCommunity Improvement$3k
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $101k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$5,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC$16,200
DEGENSTEIN COMMUNITY LIBRARY$8,800
GREATER SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY YMCA$8,000
JANE & ANNETTA M HERR MEMORIAL LIBR$5,400
SHAMOKIN-COAL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRA$5,400
WEST END LIBRARY INC$5,400
MOUNT CARMEL AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,400
RALPHO TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,400
MILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,400
DEGENSTEIN COMMUNITY LIBRARY$5,400
THE THOMAS BEAVER FREE LIBRARY$5,400
MONTGOMERY HOUSE INC$5,400
PRIESTLEY-FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY$5,400
SHIKELLAMY BRAVES FOUNDATION A NONP$5,000
SPREADING ANTLERS CHILDRENS FOUNDAT$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DWELL-LYCOMING COUNTY: $1k → 12%GETTING AHEAD FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $350 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $350 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%WILLIAM AND ANN ROLL FOUNDATION: $700 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$714k · 23 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
11

Total granted

$714k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+47%

Still filing today

61%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JR
    JOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $99k · revenue +17%
  • PF
    PRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +6%
  • GS
    Greater Susquehanna Valley YMCA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $39k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • SC
    SUSQUEHANNA COUNCIL BSA
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue -20%
  • UK
    US KIDS GOLF FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +91%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Murrysville Community Library

The Murrysville Community Library serves the communitys evolving informational needs. We connect people with ideas and information, promote lifelong learning, and help build the community.

Education
2
Penn Hills Library

A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.

Education
3
Mountain Lakes Free Public Library

The mission of the Mountain Lakes Free Public Library is to provide free access to books, periodicals, magazines, audio, video, digital and internet media

Education
4
Montour Falls Memorial Library

The montour falls library creates an environment that nurtures intellectual freedom, encourages lifelong learning, offers open access to resources, supports new technologies, respects cultural diversity, and embraces the future.

Education
5
Riegelsville Public Library

The Organization serves Riegelsville Borough and Durham Township, providing and accessing print and multimedia resources for patrons of all ages in a professional and courteous environment.

Education
6
Millvale Community Library

To ensure the preservation and transmission of society's knowledge, history and culture, and to provide the people of Millvale with free and open access to information for education, recreation and reference.

Education
7
Monessen Public Library

Monessen Public Library provides collection facilities and services to the people of the Monessen community, which assists them in fulfilling their need for information, research sources, and cultural enrichment.

8
Moore Memorial Library

Public librarythis organization provides valuable library services to the local community. over 50,000 items are checked out

9
Mifflin County Library Association

To provide materials and services to help county residents meet their information needs.

10
Western Pocono Community Library

Public Library open free of charge to all members of the community

11
Parkesburg Free Library

The mission of the Parkesburg Free Library is to provide the Parkesburg Borough and surrounding communities with book materials and information necessary for personal growth and life long learning. We seek to guide community and business…

12
Honey Brook Community Library

Operation of a community library in honey brook, pennsylvania.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Snyder County Libraries Inc and the most unlike its peers is William J and Ann M Roll Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal Arts & Education Supp…Integrated Health SystemsCommunity Support ServicesCommunity Foundations and T…Public LibrariesSusquehanna Valley Communit…Senior Housing and Care Ser…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 26. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number15%4%<5yr12%16%5–10yr17%4%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr17%8%35–55yr23%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value15%12%<5yr12%2%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr17%5%35–55yr23%58%55yr+

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
8%
69/888

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY — $98,812 · OtherJOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARYIndividual grant recipient — $71,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY — $52,012 · OtherPRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARYSHIKELLAMY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $49,600 · OtherSHIKELLAMY SCHOOL DISTRICTSHAMOKIN-COAL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $40,162 · OtherSHAMOKIN-COAL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY INCGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCA — $39,000 · OtherGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCASUSQUEHANNA COUNCIL BSA — $34,500 · OtherSUSQUEHANNA COUNCIL BSAJANE AND ANNETTE M HERR MEMORIAL LIBRARY — $25,162 · OtherTHOMAS BEAVER FREE LIBRARY — $24,062 · OtherMILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,424 · OtherSNYDER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARIES — $20,362 · Other+15 more — $111,724 · Other+15 moreSHIKELLAMY BRAVES FOUNDATION — $70,900 · EducationSHIKELLAMY BRAVES…SNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC — $29,100 · EducationSNYDER COUNTY LIB…WEST END LIBRARY INC — $25,162 · EducationWEST END LIBRARY …+1 more — $1,500 · EducationA COMMUNITY CLINIC — $61,500 · HealthUS KIDS GOLF FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY CENTER — $7,500 · Recreation & SportsSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY — $16,750 · PhilanthropyWILLIAM J AND ANN M ROLL FOUNDATION — $5,950 · Human ServicesTHE GETTING AHEAD FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Human ServicesDWELL - LYCOMING COUNTY — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE — $2,500 · Community Improvement
Other$587,320Education$126,662Health$61,500Recreation & Sports$22,500Philanthropy$16,750Human Services$9,450Community Improvement$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY — $98,812 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetSHIKELLAMY BRAVES FOUNDATION — $70,900 over 2y, 36% of budgetA COMMUNITY CLINIC — $61,500 over 5y, 13% of budgetPRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY — $52,012 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetSHAMOKIN-COAL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $40,162 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetGreater Susquehanna Valley YMCA — $39,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC — $29,100 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetJANE AND ANNETTE M HERR MEMORIAL LIBRARY — $25,162 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetWEST END LIBRARY INC — $25,162 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetTHOMAS BEAVER FREE LIBRARY — $24,062 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetMILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,424 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetMONTGOMERY HOUSE INC — $17,562 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY — $16,750 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $16,400 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetUS KIDS GOLF FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRALPHO TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY — $10,500 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetCENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA SIGHT SERVICES — $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY CENTER — $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWILLIAM J AND ANN M ROLL FOUNDATION — $5,950 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ARC SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHN R KAUFFMAN JR PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds SHIKELLAMY BRAVES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds A COMMUNITY CLINIC
  • Who funds PRIESTLEY FORSYTH MEMORIAL LIBRARY
  • Who funds SHAMOKIN-COAL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
  • Who funds Greater Susquehanna Valley YMCA
  • Who funds SNYDER COUNTY LIBRARIES INC
  • Who funds JANE AND ANNETTE M HERR MEMORIAL LIBRARY
  • Who funds WEST END LIBRARY INC
  • Who funds THOMAS BEAVER FREE LIBRARY
  • Who funds MILTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY HOUSE INC
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY
  • Who funds MT CARMEL PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
  • Who funds US KIDS GOLF FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds RALPHO TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds CENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA SIGHT SERVICES
  • Who funds DANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds WILLIAM J AND ANN M ROLL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE GETTING AHEAD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE IMPROVED MILTON EXPERIENCE
  • Who funds THE ARC SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY
  • Who funds DWELL - LYCOMING COUNTY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The 1994 Charles B Degenstein FdnPA32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn · Degenstein Charitable Foundation · Community Giving Foundation · First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · Ppl Foundation · Fern & Gladys Moyer Memorial Trust · Guyer Foundation · Seiple Family Foundation · Sunbury Northumberland Commtr · Degenstein Charles B Fdn-Char Tr · S Luther Savidge Trust · The John and Barbara Pagana Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to 2006 Edward S Rosenblum Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph