Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ten Talents Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
60
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$7.0MHousing & Shelter$4.1MInternational$4.1MHuman Services$3.7MPhilanthropy$1.2MHealth$905kCommunity Improvement$826kYouth Development$611kOther$0
02FY2024 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $412k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+5 grants · $3.5M
$25,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$147M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES$1,166,600
SIGNATRY CHARITABLE TRUST$930,643
NORTHLAND CHURCH$861,600
Individual grant recipient$265,000
HOPE FOR ORPHANS USA INC$251,149
TEN BY THREE FKA THE BLESSING BASKET$155,000
THE FORGOTTEN INITIATIVE$150,000
LIFT DISABILITY NETWORK$125,000
SALT EXCHANGE$125,000
REDEEM INTERNATIONAL$100,000
AVAIL NYC$100,000
GATEWAY TO HOPE$100,000
SEED EFFECT$100,000
STARFISH PROJECT$100,000
DESIGN OUTREACH$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $10.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IMMERSE ARKANSAS: $50k → 17%CHRIST'S HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $196k → 10%UNLESS U: $25k → 16%HIINGA: $25k → 10%PATH UNITED: $60k → 9%STARFISH PROJECT: $100k → 13%GATEWAY TO HOPE: $100k → 7%AVAIL NYC: $100k → 17%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $122k → 5%IMMERSE ARKANSAS: $50k → 17%CHRIST'S HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $100k → 10%HIINGA: $25k → 10%PATH UNITED: $60k → 9%STARFISH PROJECT: $50k → 13%GATEWAY TO HOPE: $60k → 7%THE FORGOTTEN INITIATIVE: $25k → 11%AVAIL NYC: $100k → 17%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $50k → 5%IMMERSE ARKANSAS: $50k → 17%OCA - OPPORTUNITY COMMUNITY ABILITY: $320k → 13%HIINGA: $25k → 10%PATH UNITED: $55k → 9%STARFISH PROJECT: $50k → 13%AVAIL NYC: $100k → 17%THE PATH PROJECT: $45k → 9%STARFISH PROJECT: $50k → 13%STARFISH PROJECT: $50k → 13%HOPE FOR ORPHANS USA INC: $251k → 15%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS (CAFO): $75k → 6%HOPE FOR ORPHANS USA INC: $193k → 15%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $101k → 5%MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES: $1.2M → 13%HOPE FOR ORPHANS USA INC: $178k → 15%AVAIL NYC: $50k → 17%MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES: $990k → 13%MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES: $916k → 13%MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $339k → 13%KAIROS ADVENTURES INC: $75k → 11%MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $193k → 13%KAIROS ADVENTURES INC: $50k → 11%MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $159k → 13%LIFT DISABILITY NETWORK: $125k → 13%LIFT DISABILITY NETWORK: $100k → 13%LIFT DISABILITY NETWORK: $100k → 13%MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $100k → 13%MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $30k → 13%TEN TALENTS GLOBAL INITIATIVES: $2.0M → 11%TEN TALENTS GLOBAL INITIATIVES: $506k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 21% of Ten Talents Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Ten Talents Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 62 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

62 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
26

Total granted

$18M
$916k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+46%

Still filing today

69%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $375k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +108%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR ORPHANS USA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $622k · revenue +6% · 90% of their budget
  • LD
    LIFT DISABILITY NETWORK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $425k · revenue +235% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • N
    NONPAREIL
    one grant, 2023 · $400k
  • HF
    HOPE FOR ORPHANS
    one grant, 2021 · $119k
  • MC
    MAGIC CITY WOODWORKS (MANUFACTURE GOOD)
    one grant, 2022 · $105k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
3
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
4
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
5
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

6
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

7
Christar International Inc

Christar international serves as a catalyst to the network of christar ministries by facilitating and encouraging partnerships with churches who sen dout men and women who proclaim the gospel for life-giving transformation in communitiesw…

Religion
8
Harvest Bridge

Harvest Bridge equips South Asian Christians to serve their communities more effectively. With our assistance, people and communities in South Asia are transformed by the love of Christ.

Religion
9
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

10
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
11
Servenow

Sharing Christ's Passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.

Human Services
12
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orphan Outreach and the most unlike its peers is Ten Talents Global Initiatives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Pregnancy Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity FoundationsYouth Development CentersPolicy Research and AdvocacyIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Arts CentersDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%41%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%49%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/83
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,482

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
76/78
Grantees still filing
48/78
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $3,944,447 · Human ServicesMATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES INCTEN TALENTS GLOBAL INITIATIVES — $2,472,175 · Human ServicesTEN TALENTS GLOBAL INITIATIVESHOPE FOR ORPHANS USA INC — $622,109 · Human ServicesHOPE FOR ORPHANS USA INCLIFT DISABILITY NETWORK INC — $425,000 · Human ServicesAVAIL NYC — $350,000 · Human Services+25 more — $2,588,338 · Human Services+25 moreNORTHLAND CHURCH INC — $2,828,998 · OtherNORTHLAND CHURCH INCHANDS AT WORK IN AFRICA — $619,000 · OtherHANDS AT WORK IN AFRICAIndividual grant recipient — $603,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNONPAREIL — $400,068 · OtherNONPAREIL+51 more — $1,899,643 · Other+51 moreServant Foundation — $3,911,813 · ReligionServant FoundationPraxis Inc — $265,200 · ReligionPraxis Inc+3 more — $123,390 · ReligionTHE SIGNATRY CHARITABLE TRUST — $930,643 · PhilanthropyTMG FOUNDATION — $599,077 · PhilanthropySALTEXCHANGE INC — $150,000 · PhilanthropyCHARITYVEST INC — $82,500 · Philanthropy+1 more — $15,000 · PhilanthropyRedeem International — $300,000 · InternationalTen By Three — $220,000 · InternationalSEED EFFECT — $160,000 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $75,000 · International+6 more — $40,260 · InternationalLIFE REMODELED — $425,000 · Housing & ShelterDESIGN OUTREACH INC — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterMAGIC CITY WOODWORKS — $155,000 · EmploymentHUSTLE USA — $10,000 · Employment
Human Services$10,402,069Other$6,351,459Religion$4,300,403Philanthropy$1,777,220International$795,260Housing & Shelter$525,000Employment$165,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $3,944,447 over 5y, 20% of budgetServant Foundation — $3,911,813 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTEN TALENTS GLOBAL INITIATIVES — $2,472,175 over 2y, 80% of budgetTHE SIGNATRY CHARITABLE TRUST — $930,643 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE FOR ORPHANS USA INC — $622,109 over 3y, 90% of budgetTMG FOUNDATION — $599,077 over 3y, 10% of budgetLIFT DISABILITY NETWORK INC — $425,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetLIFE REMODELED — $425,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetAVAIL NYC — $350,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetOCA OPPORTUNITY COMMUNITY ABILITY INC — $332,500 over 2y, 16% of budgetCHRISTS HOPE U S A INC — $320,238 over 2y, 13% of budgetRedeem International — $300,000 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetStarfish Project Incorporated — $300,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetNONPAREIL INSTITUTE — $281,100 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetPraxis Inc — $265,200 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetPATH UNITED INC — $250,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetTen By Three — $220,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetHealing Hands of Joy — $200,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetCONNECTIONS HOMES INC — $200,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetIMMERSE ARKANSAS — $200,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSEED EFFECT — $160,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetMAGIC CITY WOODWORKS — $155,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetSALTEXCHANGE INC — $150,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetKairos Adventures Inc — $125,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetPROGRACE INTERNATIONAL — $110,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetDESIGN OUTREACH INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetHIINGA INC — $100,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetChristian Alliance for Orphans — $100,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetLIFE PREP MINISTRIES — $88,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetCHARITYVEST INC — $82,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GATHERING — $67,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE — $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia — $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPROMISE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS — $50,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetWORLD HOPE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL — $45,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS — $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNLESS U INC — $35,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetABILITIES WORKSHOP INC — $34,500 over 2y, 34% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALTON INC — $30,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetThe Forgotten Initiative — $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSINAPIS GROUP INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDIAMOND WILLOW MINISTRIES — $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION — $12,604 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHIS CHILD HERE INC — $11,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetEVERY VILLAGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MATTHEW'S HOPE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds Servant Foundation
  • Who funds TEN TALENTS GLOBAL INITIATIVES
  • Who funds THE SIGNATRY CHARITABLE TRUST
  • Who funds HOPE FOR ORPHANS USA INC
  • Who funds TMG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LIFT DISABILITY NETWORK INC
  • Who funds LIFE REMODELED
  • Who funds AVAIL NYC
  • Who funds OCA OPPORTUNITY COMMUNITY ABILITY INC
  • Who funds CHRISTS HOPE U S A INC
  • Who funds Redeem International
  • Who funds Starfish Project Incorporated
  • Who funds NONPAREIL INSTITUTE
  • Who funds Praxis Inc
  • Who funds PATH UNITED INC
  • Who funds Ten By Three
  • Who funds Healing Hands of Joy
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS HOMES INC
  • Who funds IMMERSE ARKANSAS
  • Who funds GATEWAY TO HOPE
  • Who funds SEED EFFECT
  • Who funds MAGIC CITY WOODWORKS
  • Who funds SALTEXCHANGE INC
  • Who funds Kairos Adventures Inc
  • Who funds PROGRACE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds DESIGN OUTREACH INC
  • Who funds HIINGA INC
  • Who funds Christian Alliance for Orphans
  • Who funds LIFE PREP MINISTRIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS37.7× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · First Fruit Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Pinetops Foundation · The Pilgrim Foundation · International Generosity Foundation Trust · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Micah 68 Foundation · Stewardship Foundation · Prairie Creek Partners Charitable Foundation · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation)

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ten Talents Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Matthew's Hope Ministries Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ten Talents Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ten Talents Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph