· Private foundation
Tellabs Foundation
Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
85% of Tellabs Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to The Dupage Community Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 21 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Tellabs Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 30 organizations, $3M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k17 grants · $72k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $248k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $500k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROJECT ALS | $750,000 |
| LITTLE FRIENDS | $500,000 |
| AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION | $500,000 |
| LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER | $100,000 |
| DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| EDWARD FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| UNITED WAYCHICAGO COMMUNITY TRUST | $100,000 |
| MIDWEST HEALTH FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| NEW HOPE MISSIONS | $30,000 |
| GARDEN CENTER SERVICES | $25,000 |
| GIVING DUPAGE | $20,000 |
| PLAYSMART LITERACY INC | $20,000 |
| GLOBAL ORG FOR HEALTH EDUCATION | $12,000 |
| CARES VA | $11,000 |
| TUNNELS TO TOWERS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $641k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
43 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2020, 15 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $330k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +40%
- BCBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC3× · 2017–2020 · $623k · revenue +143%
- NHNAPERVILLE HERITAGE SOCIETY5× · 2017–2021 · $530k · revenue +26% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
AURORA UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue +44%- IMILLINOIS MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE ACone grant, 2017 · $30k
- MMMOTHER MCAULEY HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.
Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…
Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."
Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…
We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
Edward Hospital follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."
Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Friends Inc and the most unlike its peers is Life Builders. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ALS INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds NAPERVILLE HERITAGE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LITTLE FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds AURORA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Edward Foundation ↗
- Who funds GARDEN CENTER SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PLAY SMART LITERACY ↗
- Who funds VICTORY RANCH ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds GIVING DUPAGE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE LAND OF LINCOLN INC ↗
- Who funds Benedictine University ↗
- Who funds LIFE BUILDERS ↗
- Who funds St Leonard's Ministries ↗
- Who funds WOMENS CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGOLAND INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD MANOR INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Wellness House ↗
- Who funds Ride Janie Ride Foundation ↗
- Who funds KING-BRUWAERT HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · The Dupage Community Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Coleman Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Walter S & Lucienne B Driskill Foundation · Dunham Fund · Naperville Rotary Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tellabs Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tellabs Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Tellabs Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.