· Private foundation
Dunham Fund
Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k14 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $449k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Paramount Arts Centre | $1,000,000 |
| NORTH CENTRAL COLLEGE | $250,000 |
| AURORA EAST EDUC FOUNDATION | $231,500 |
| COMM FND OF THE FOX RIVER VALLEY | $212,000 |
| QUAD COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE | $130,000 |
| ROSARY HIGH SCHOOL | $125,000 |
| BATAVIA ARTISTS ASSN-WATER STREET S | $121,882 |
| FOREFRONT | $120,106 |
| ASSN FOR IND DEVELOPMENT | $115,000 |
| SUICIDE PREVENTION SERVICES | $103,000 |
| Advance Illinois | $100,000 |
| AURORA UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| Serenity House | $90,000 |
| MARIE WILKINSON FOOD PANTRY | $82,000 |
| MUTUAL GROUND | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
42 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $387k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PAPARAMOUNT ARTS CENTRE2× · 2017–2020 · $1.5M · revenue +145% · 54% of their budget
- NCNorth Central College3× · 2017–2020 · $725k · revenue +22%
- QCQUAD COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC3× · 2017–2020 · $383k · revenue +397% · 28% of their budget
Funded once
- APA PLUS FOUNDATION FOR THE WEST AURORA SCHOOLSone grant, 2017 · $625k
- AEAURORA EAST EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $553k · revenue +208%
- STSEIZE THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue +61%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To assist children who have been victims of abuse
Helping chicagoland's at-risk children and their families build, achieve and sustain better lives.
A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.
Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.
The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.
Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…
Educating and serving children and adults with autism to achieve their highest level of independence within their home, family and community.
The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.
Founded in 1883, brightpoint (formerly known as children's home & aid) is a leading statewide organization supporting families so children can thrive.
Children's advocates for change was organized to improve the lives of children in illinois by bringing about significant changes public policies and programs for children through research, policy analysis and advocacy, public education and…
To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…
To promote opportunities that result in independence and active decision making for people with disabilities and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Friends Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fox Valley Patriotic Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARAMOUNT ARTS CENTRE ↗
- Who funds North Central College ↗
- Who funds AURORA EAST EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEIZE THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds QUAD COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds FOREFRONT ↗
- Who funds FOX VALLEY UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE FOX RIVER VALLEY ↗
- Who funds ADVANCED RESOURCE RECOVERY CORPORATION NFP ↗
- Who funds MARKLUND CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds AURORA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BATAVIA ARTISTS ASSOCIATION NFP INC WATER STREET STUDIOS ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds MARIE WILKINSON FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds TRIPLE THREAT MENTORING INC ↗
- Who funds INDIVIDUAL ADVOCACY GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds SUICIDE PREVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MUTUAL GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds WAUBONSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds ADVANCE ILLINOIS NFP ↗
- Who funds FOX VALLEY HANDS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THE GLORIA J TAYLOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE INNOVATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds VNA Health Care ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley · Dunham Foundation · The Bersted Foundation · Fox Valley United Way · The Dupage Community Foundation · Inc Mental Health Alliance · The Rich Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Juvenile Protective Association of Aurora Illinois · Naperville Rotary Charities Inc · The Chicago Community Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dunham Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dunham Fund?
Find your warmest path to Dunham Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.