Skip to content

Minnesota · Private foundation

Tartan Area Youth Enrichment

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$363k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
15
Grants FY2026
21
Organizations funded FY2025
29%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$15,080
Largest grant, FY2026
$135,049
Organizations funded a year
5 to 21
FY2019 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
2
Total assets, FY2026
$185k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 29% of the organizations Tartan Area Youth Enrichment funded were first-time grantees, receiving 12% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving14$363k14%
FY202521$509k29%
FY202417$479k59%
FY20239$245k22%
FY20227$114k0%
FY20215$32k0%
FY202011$177k27%
FY201915$245k47%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.5MRecreation & Sports$462kCommunity Improvement$139kHuman Services$97kArts & Culture$62kYouth Development$36kReligion$6k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
WI
MI
NY
CO
MO
AZ

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Higher Education Association$868,95710n/a
Cretin-Derham Hall$62,3694n/a
Legacy Parents Booster Club$57,1543n/a
St Thomas Academy$49,7023n/a
East Metro Stars Youth Hockey Association$27,81624%
Crossfire Youth Sports$21,59821%
Young Mens Christian Association of the North$20,73520%
University of St Thomas$16,15120%
Minnehaha Academy$15,28520%
Fond Du Lac Tribal & Community College$14,5002n/a
Show all 20 grantees
All grantees of Tartan Area Youth Enrichment by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Higher Education Association$868,95710n/a
Cretin-Derham Hall$62,3694n/a
Legacy Parents Booster Club$57,1543n/a
St Thomas Academy$49,7023n/a
East Metro Stars Youth Hockey Association$27,81624%
Crossfire Youth Sports$21,59821%
Young Mens Christian Association of the North$20,73520%
University of St Thomas$16,15120%
Minnehaha Academy$15,28520%
Fond Du Lac Tribal & Community College$14,5002n/a
Hill-Murray School$11,6051n/a
Grand Canyon University$10,14710%
Regis University$9,65510%
Cornell University$7,00010%
University of Wisconsin$5,9511n/a
Stillwater Area Hockey Association$5,71410%
St Catherine University$5,4971n/a
Homegrown Lacrosse$5,2001n/a
Maplewood Figure Skating Club Inc$5,19912%
St Louis University$5,13910%

Plus 30 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.4M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Tartan Area Youth Enrichment supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEast Metro Stars Youth Hockey Association: $27,816 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetCrossfire Youth Sports: $21,598 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of the North: $20,735 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $16,151 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMinnehaha Academy: $15,285 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $10,147 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRegis University: $9,655 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStillwater Area Hockey Association: $5,714 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMaplewood Figure Skating Club Inc: $5,199 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSt Louis University: $5,139 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Tartan Area Youth Enrichment with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tartan Area Youth Enrichment?

Find your warmest path to Tartan Area Youth Enrichment through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Tartan Area Youth Enrichment

How much does Tartan Area Youth Enrichment give?
Tartan Area Youth Enrichment reported 15 grants totaling $363,296 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 21 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2025.
What does Tartan Area Youth Enrichment fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2026, its largest causes are Education (65%), Recreation & Sports (20%), Community Improvement (6%).
Who are Tartan Area Youth Enrichment's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2026: Higher Education Association ($869k), Cretin-Derham Hall ($62k), Legacy Parents Booster Club ($57k).
Does Tartan Area Youth Enrichment fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 29% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Tartan Area Youth Enrichment accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Tartan Area Youth Enrichment?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation, United Way Worldwide, Baird Foundation Inc.
Where is Tartan Area Youth Enrichment based?
Tartan Area Youth Enrichment is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tartan Area Youth Enrichment’s filings →

More from the funding graph