Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tappan Clancy Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$131kEducation$94kReligion$60kHousing & Shelter$59kYouth Development$50kHuman Services$25kFood & Nutrition$11kAnimals$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $81k
$3,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Nativity of our Lord$21,000
Bates College$10,000
TGTHR$10,000
TRU Community Care$10,000
Homeboy Industries$10,000
Denver Waldorf School$10,000
Speech and Language Development Cnt$10,000
Camphill FoundationTurtle Tree Seed$3,600
Camphill Foundation$3,600
Angelica Village$3,600
Butterfly Pavilion$3,000
Focus$2,500
The Anchor Center for Blind Childre$1,700
Hope House$1,000
Write On Sports Denver$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Camphill Foundation: $5k → 11%Hope House: $1k → 7%TRU Community Care: $10k → 12%TRU Community Care: $10k → 12%TRU Community Care: $8k → 12%Camphill Foundation: $4k → 11%TRU Community Care: $8k → 12%Camphill Foundation: $3k → 11%TRU Community Care: $8k → 12%TGTHR: $10k → 12%TGTHR: $10k → 12%TGTHR: $10k → 12%TGTHR: $10k → 12%Attention Homes: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$391k · 19 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$391k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
-9%

Still filing today

63%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ATTENTION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +48%
  • HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +74%
  • LO
    Linden Oaks
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • CS
    Cancer Support Community
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • BC
    Bates College Summer Scholar Program
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • BC
    Bates College Summer Scholar Prgm
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Denver Children's Home

Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Laradon Hall Society for Exceptional Children and Adults

To provide superior service to children and adults with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
5
Tennyson Center for Children At Colorado Christian Home

Tennyson center for children (tcc) is dedicated to helping children who have experienced severe abuse, neglect, and/or trauma so they can bravely, and safely, change their life's story. tcc's trained professionals empower children and…

Human Services
6
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
7
The Rise School of Denver

The purpose of the Rise School of Denver is to provide the highest quality inclusive early childhood education and therapy for children with and without developmental disabilities. We do this by providing exemplary school- and clinic-based…

Education
8
The Gathering Place a Refuge for Rebuilding Lives

We are community of safety and hope where positive relationships, choice, and essential resources transform lives. guiding principles: we serve women, children and transgender individuals who are experiencing poverty or homelessness. we…

Housing & Shelter
9
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
10
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
11
Authoracare Collective

Authoracare collective empowers people to be active participants in their care journey, enabling them to live on their own terms through personalized support for mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
12
Kent Denver Country Day School

Excellence in scholarship and character is the goal of a kent denver education. the school seeks to build a caring, diverse community of responsible citizens. to that end, the school provides a challenging college preparatory curriculum…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope House of Colorado and the most unlike its peers is Raphaels Garden. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIVITY OF OUR LORD CATHOLIC PARISH IN BROOMFIELD — $52,000 · OtherNATIVITY OF OUR LORD CATHOLIC PARISH…Cancer Support Community — $15,000 · OtherCancer Support CommunityCamphill FoundationTurtle Tree Seed — $11,100 · OtherCamphill FoundationTurtle Tree SeedBates College Summer Scholar Program — $10,000 · OtherBates College Summer Scholar ProgramBates College Summer Scholar Prgm — $10,000 · OtherBates College Summer Scholar PrgmCATHOLIC CHARITIES USA — $7,500 · OtherNational Kidney Foundation — $5,500 · OtherCASA Adams Broomfield County — $5,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS — $5,000 · OtherST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · OtherST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC+7 more — $15,200 · Other+7 moreATTENTION INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesATTENTION INCTRU COMMUNITY CARE — $44,000 · Human ServicesTRU COMMUNITY CARECAMPHILL FOUNDATION — $11,100 · Human ServicesCAMPHILL FOUNDATIONYMCA OF THE ROCKIES — $7,500 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE ROCKIES+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesRAPHAELS GARDEN — $31,000 · EducationRAPHAELS GARDENPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $30,000 · EducationPRESIDENT AND TRU…THE DENVER WALDORF SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · EducationTHE DENVER WALDOR…Linden Oaks — $50,000 · HealthLinden OaksChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $5,000 · HealthChildren's Ho…HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY INDU…ANGELICA VILLAGE — $8,600 · Housing & ShelterROCKY MOUNTAIN BUTTERFLY CONSORTIUM — $8,000 · Animals
Other$144,300Human Services$113,600Education$71,000Health$55,000Youth Development$50,000Housing & Shelter$8,600Animals$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetATTENTION INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLinden Oaks — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTRU COMMUNITY CARE — $44,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAPHAELS GARDEN — $31,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPHILL FOUNDATION — $11,100 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE DENVER WALDORF SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANGELICA VILLAGE — $8,600 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN BUTTERFLY CONSORTIUM — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROCKIES — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATTENTION INC
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES
  • Who funds Linden Oaks
  • Who funds TRU COMMUNITY CARE
  • Who funds RAPHAELS GARDEN
  • Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE
  • Who funds CAMPHILL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE DENVER WALDORF SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds ANGELICA VILLAGE
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN BUTTERFLY CONSORTIUM
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE ROCKIES
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Tappan Foundation Agy · The Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tappan Clancy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tappan Clancy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tappan Clancy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph