Skip to content

· Private foundation

TAO Aspire Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$11kEducation$8kReligion$7kEmployment$7kHealth$6kArts & Culture$4kInternational$3kScience & Tech$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$429
Median grant
3
States reached
$280k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Be the Change Program$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Home of Christ Cupertino HOC5$1,000
Stanford University Gifting$650
Stream Of Praise Music Ministries$522
NATURE CONSERVANCY$515
University Of Virginia Alumni Assoc$500
SCU Alumni Association$500
Ocean Conservancy$500
World Vision$429
Sempervirens Fund$375
Chinese Church in Christ CCIC$307
Health4TheWorld$300
CityTeam Ministeries$258
Lucile Packard Childrens Hospital$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $265) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Tianyi Studios Corporation: $100 → 10%CEF NorCal Silicon Valley: $165 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of TAO Aspire Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

TAO Aspire Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27k · 18 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
49

Total granted

$27k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
0%

Still filing today

17%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEnvironmentReligionHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SEMPERVIRENS FUND
    5× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +61%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $750 · revenue +49%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY GIVING TREE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $425 · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • VC
    Valley Christian Warrior Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • UF
    UCSB Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • HO
    Home of Christ 5
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
9
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
10
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
11
Save Cantonese

Save Cantonese is an international movement that sustains and celebrates Cantonese language and culture. We have three Strategic Aims: a) protect and strengthen educational and research infrastructure for the Cantonese language, b) affirm…

Arts & Culture
12
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Online Giving Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bupt Alumni Association of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/28
Grantees still filing
13/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Be the Change Program: $6,700 · OtherBe the Change ProgramTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,075 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient: $2,830 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHome of Christ Cupertino HOC5: $2,700 · OtherHome of Christ Cupertino HOC5Ocean Conservancy: $2,500 · OtherOcean ConservancyUCSB College of Engineering and Co: $1,700 · OtherValley Christian Warrior Fund: $1,500 · OtherUCSB Foundation: $1,500 · Other+50 more: $19,095 · Other+50 moreSEMPERVIRENS FUND: $2,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $750 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $250 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $250 · EnvironmentSaint Lukes Foundation: $888 · HealthHealth4TheWorld: $800 · HealthPIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital: $412 · HealthFLUSHING HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $343 · Health+1 more: $50 · HealthAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $900 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER BUFFALO INC: $500 · PhilanthropyWORLD VISION INC: $1,385 · InternationalPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $600 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $500 · EducationBUPT ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $206 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSE: $66 · EducationSTREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $522 · ReligionCHINESE WORLDWIDE GOSPEL MISSION: $222 · ReligionAMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC: $150 · Religion
Other$42,600Environment$3,250Health$2,493Philanthropy$1,400International$1,385Education$1,372Religion$894

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,075 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPERVIRENS FUND: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $1,385 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSaint Lukes Foundation: $888 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Jose Police Foundation: $515 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER BUFFALO INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY GIVING TREE: $425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital: $412 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $365 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLUSHING HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $343 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE WORLDWIDE GOSPEL MISSION: $222 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCEF Norcal: $165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA PRABASI INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTianyi Studios Corporation: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF SAINT ROSE: $66 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SILICON VALLEY LEADERSHIP GROUP: $49 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SEMPERVIRENS FUND ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Saint Lukes Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Health4TheWorld ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds San Jose Police Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER BUFFALO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY GIVING TREE ↗
  • Who funds PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds FLUSHING HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization TAO Aspire Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from TAO Aspire Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on TAO Aspire’s filings →

    More from the funding graph