Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tankenoff Families Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$887k
Granted FY2025still arriving
70
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Philanthropy$2.1MReligion$876kHuman Services$668kInternational$320kArts & Culture$278kYouth Development$209kHealth$207kHousing & Shelter$170kOther$0
02FY2025 · 70 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k49 grants · $129k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $231k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $527k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION$175,000
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$100,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MN$77,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL$75,000
SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK$50,000
OPEN BOOK$50,000
HERZL CAMP$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
SABES JCC OF MINNEAPOLIS$20,000
MINNESOTA HILLEL FOUNDATION$20,000
MINNPOST$16,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$15,700
NORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS ARTS ASSOCIATION$15,000
MINNESOTA ACTS NOW$15,000
PRAIRIECARE FUND$14,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $241k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MYOSITIS ASSOCIATION: $50 → 6%SOJOURNER PROJECT INC: $8k → 11%SOJOURNER PROJECT INC: $8k → 11%SOJOURNER PROJECT INC: $8k → 11%SOJOURNER PROJECT INC: $8k → 11%OPEN ARMS: $5k → 14%SOJOURNER PROJECT INC: $8k → 11%INTERACT CENTER FOR THE VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS: $7k → 14%INTERACT CENTER FOR THE VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS: $7k → 14%INTERACT CENTER FOR THE VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS: $7k → 14%SOJOURNER PROJECT INC: $300 → 11%INTERACT CENTER FOR THE VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS: $7k → 14%INTERACT CENTER FOR THE VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS: $7k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ST PAUL: $8k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ST PAUL: $8k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ST PAUL: $8k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ST PAUL: $8k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ST PAUL: $8k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ST PAUL: $8k → 14%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS: $10k → 11%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS: $5k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $8k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $8k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $8k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $8k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $8k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $8k → 11%APPETITE FOR CHANGE: $5k → 11%APPETITE FOR CHANGE: $5k → 11%APPETITE FOR CHANGE: $5k → 11%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES: $8k → 11%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES: $5k → 11%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES: $5k → 11%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
NJ
CA
KY
MD
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.8M · 88 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

88 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

88
30

Total granted

$3.8M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+18%

Still filing today

65%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $460k · revenue +266%
  • HC
    HERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $190k · revenue +102%
  • M
    MinnPost
    6× · 2020–2025 · $77k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • CY
    CHABAD YOUNG PROFESSIONALS
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • UF
    UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
4
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
5
Minnesota Jewish Community Center

The minnesota jcc is dedicated to strengthening our community by providing inclusive programs that inspire personal growth, foster connection, and promote well-being through arts, culture, education, fitness, early childhood, day camp and…

—
6
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
7
St Paul Transportation Management Organization

Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…

Environment
8
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
9
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
10
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
11
Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.

—
12
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Jewish Federation and the most unlike its peers is Prairiecare Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development ServicesCommunity Arts CentersDomestic Violence ServicesCancer Support ServicesFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%1%<5yr14%6%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr20%29%20–35yr15%28%35–55yr13%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr20%13%20–35yr15%14%35–55yr13%54%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/92
the rest of the field
12%
5,623/46,357

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
82/85
Grantees still filing
52/85
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEMPLE ISRAEL — $475,884 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAELJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS — $460,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE…JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MN — $407,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MNSABES JCC OF MINNEAPOLIS — $108,000 · OtherMINNESOTA HILLEL — $107,500 · OtherSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC — $90,000 · Other+85 more — $1,043,471 · Other+85 moreMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION — $1,426,500 · PhilanthropyMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATIONJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $100,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SO…+4 more — $92,950 · Philanthropy+4 moreAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · International+1 more — $100 · InternationalMinnPost — $77,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS ARTS ASSOC — $63,950 · Arts & CultureOpen Book — $50,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $29,500 · Arts & CultureSPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS — $22,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $15,250 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $18,700 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION — $46,750 · Human ServicesCRESCENT COVE — $45,000 · Human ServicesSojourner Project Inc — $37,800 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesINTERACT CENTER FOR THE VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS — $35,000 · Human ServicesEAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC — $20,500 · Human ServicesAPPETITE FOR CHANGE INC — $15,000 · Human Services+3 more — $6,050 · Human ServicesHERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC — $190,000 · Recreation & SportsPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA — $55,500 · HealthGILDA'S CLUB TWIN CITIES INC — $31,000 · HealthCaringBridge — $12,000 · HealthMinnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance Inc — $6,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $5,000 · Health+5 more — $1,700 · Health
Other$2,691,855Philanthropy$1,619,450International$320,100Arts & Culture$276,400Human Services$241,100Recreation & Sports$190,000Health$111,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION — $1,426,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS — $460,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC — $190,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetMINNESOTA HILLEL — $107,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC — $90,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMinnPost — $77,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $72,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAND BANK TWIN CITIES INC — $64,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS ARTS ASSOC — $63,950 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA — $55,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPRAIRIECARE FUND — $48,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION — $46,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCRESCENT COVE — $45,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSojourner Project Inc — $37,800 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $35,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS INC — $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJEWFOLK MEDIA INC — $35,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetINTERACT CENTER FOR THE VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS — $35,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB TWIN CITIES INC — $31,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $29,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $25,709 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES TOO — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED — $23,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTwin Cities Rise — $22,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS — $22,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC — $20,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY — $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetResourcewest — $17,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPACER CENTER INC — $15,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $15,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAPPETITE FOR CHANGE INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREVE ACADEMY — $13,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCaringBridge — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas — $11,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMinnesota Council on Foundations — $10,025 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BLAKE SCHOOL — $8,783 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Humane Society — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPKINS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMINNESOTA BROWNFIELDS — $8,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE EDINA ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMinnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance Inc — $6,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MinnPost ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds LAND BANK TWIN CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS ARTS ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds Open Book ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIECARE FUND ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENT COVE ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ACTS NOW ↗
  • Who funds Sojourner Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWFOLK MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERACT CENTER FOR THE VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB TWIN CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES TOO ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Twin Cities Rise ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis Found…Saint Paul & Minnesot…Otto Bremer TrustPohlad Family Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…The K FoundationThe Richard M Schulze…Mike & Linda Fiterman…The McKnight Foundati…Xcel Energy FoundationLinsmayer James B Fdn…Russell T Lund Charit…
The Minneapolis FoundationMN48.6× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Pohlad Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The K Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Mike & Linda Fiterman Family Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Linsmayer James B Fdn Tr-Main · Russell T Lund Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tankenoff Families Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home