· Public charity
Tampa Bay Sports Commission Inc
Our mission is to generate social and economic impact throughout the tampa bay region by attracting, promoting and/or organizing youth and amateur sporting events and initiatives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC | $37,500 |
| TAMPA BAY BOWL ASSOCIATION INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 51% of Tampa Bay Sports Commission Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 66% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 16% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCOPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC6× · 2017–2024 · $163k · revenue +53%
- TBTAMPA BAY BOWL ASSOCIATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +13%
- KTKEEP TAMPA BAY BEAUTIFUL2× · 2021–2022 · $40k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- CFCOLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYOFF FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $620k
- GIGenYOUTH Incorporatedone grant, 2020 · $400k · revenue -50%
- UWUNITED WAY SUNCOAST INCone grant, 2021 · $373k · revenue -46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.
Discovering, preserving, and learning from our region's past to inform our common future. the history center includes three floors of permanent and temporary exhibition galleries focusing on 12,000 years of florida history.
The cfef maximizes the impact of florida's local education foundations to facilitate their support of classroom innovation and student achievement, often serving as a conduit for public and private funders interest in impacting student…
Step up for students empowers families to pursue and engage in the most appropriate learning options for their children, with an emphasis on families who lack the information and financial resources to access these options. by pursuing…
The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.
The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…
To inspire and empower students qualifying for need-based scholarships to become future community leaders through a rigorous middle school program coupled with ongoing graduate support.
To enhance the quality of life for all residents now and for future generations; to build permanent endowments, to provide community leadership on relevant issues, and to address needs through grantmaking. as part of our strategic plan,…
To inspire and empower students who qualify for need-based scholarships to become future community leaders through a rigorous middle school program coupled with ongoing graduate support.
To develop and sustain a thriving local economy by focusing on the attraction, expansion and retention of high wage jobs and capital investment.
The organization's mission is to bring academic, work, life and economic opportunities to students whose potential to contribute to a robust florida is largely untapped.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tampa Museum of Art Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GenYOUTH Incorporated ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY SUNCOAST INC ↗
- Who funds TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds COPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds TAMPA BAY BOWL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds Community Tampa Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds DERRICK BROOKS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKS-DEBARTOLO CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds USF RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KEEP TAMPA BAY BEAUTIFUL ↗
- Who funds TAMPA BAY BLACK HERITAGE FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds PINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PASCO EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hillsborough Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds ST PETERSBURG COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds TAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds FRAMEWORKS OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds Dress for Success Tampa Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds TAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds WATER SMART TOTS INC ↗
- Who funds Preserve Vision Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds Enterprising Latinas Inc ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds BULLARD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IVY ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds MORE HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds DR TRACIS HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Pinellas Community Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · United Way Suncoast Inc · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · Florida Health Sciences Center Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Copperhead Charities Inc · Foundation for a Healthy St Petersburg Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tampa Bay Sports Commission Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Champions for Children Inc — 14% of income from government
- Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc — 12% of income from government
- New Life Village Inc — 7% of income from government
- Tampa Metropolitan Area Young Men's Christian Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc — 3% of income from government
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pasco Education Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Tampa Museum of Art Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Florida Aquarium Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.