How much did FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER INC grant in FY2024?

Health$2.7MEducation$1.4MPhilanthropy$939kInternational$286kArts & Culture$205kHuman Services$205kCommunity Improvement$159kYouth Development$118kRecreation & Sports$115kOther$1.3M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

birthdiabetesbuild

2020

employmentworkersjob trainingpromoting tampakidneyaffectedeconomic

2022

ninebetterntsoverallincomeneighborhood transformationtransformation strategy

2023

firefightersminoritygaladisabilitieswayparks recreationhcc

2024

bikesoireebikesgirlsholidaygalaluncheon

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $48k
$10k–50k19 grants · $445k
$50k–250k6 grants · $652k
$250k+2 grants · $617k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.5B

Total assets

Largest grants

COPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC$320,167
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$296,875
USF FOUNDATION$183,444
TAMPA HOPE (CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC)$180,000
MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC$135,000
TAMPA BAY SPORTS COMMISSION INC$53,500
RICHARD DAVID KANN MELANOMA FOUNDATION$50,000
HCC FOUNDATION INC$50,000
BULLARD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC$47,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF$45,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$40,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$38,200
ST PETE PRIDE INC$28,000
GASPARILLA DISTANCE$25,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF TAMPA BAY INC$22,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 21% of FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER INC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 71% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 61% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER INClessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.0M · 35 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

35 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.0M

$984k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%

+41%

Still filing today

91%

86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $501k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CC
COPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC
6× · 2018–2024 · $932k · revenue +34%
AH
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC
5× · 2018–2024 · $917k · revenue +14%
TH
THE HILLSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
3× · 2018–2024 · $405k · revenue +96%

Funded once

TF
TAMPA FAMILY HEALTH CENTERSgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +52%
TS
THE SALVATION ARMY
one grant, 2018 · $161k · revenue -25%
HI
HEALTHWISE INCgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $125k · revenue +145%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Tampa Bay History Center

Discovering, preserving, and learning from our region's past to inform our common future.

Environment

University of Florida

To assist the university of florida in funding of research & development through grants & contractual arrangements & in the commercialization of intellectual properties, which include inventions, discoveries, processes, & work products.

Education

University of Florida Alumni

Education and research and shaping a better future for florida, the nation and the world," as determined by the university of florida board of trustees. the association strengthens the gator nation by involving and engaging its alumni,…

Education

Tampa Bay Latin-American Medical So

Arts & Culture

Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

Committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

—

Tampa Bay Watch Inc

Tampa bay watch is dedicated to fostering a healthy tampa bay watershed through community-driven restorating projects, education programs, and outreach initiatives.

Environment

University of South Florida Alumni Association Inc

The mission of the USF Alumni Association is to foster a mutually beneficial, lifelong relationship between the University and its alumni; to inspire loyalty and pride among current and future alumni; and to advocate for excellence in…

Education

Tampabay-Job-Links Inc

—

Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce Inc

To serve our members and enhance our community by building business success

—

The Arc Tampa Bay Foundation Inc

To secure the financial future of services for individuals served by the arc tampa bay, inc.

Human Services

Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce

To support the greater tampa chamber of commerce through leadership and educational programs.

Education

Florida State University Alumni

To build a network of alumni and friends and sustain meaningful relationships on behalf of florida state university. this vision is accomplished through engaging alumni and friends via programs and services that foster pride and enhance a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tampa Bay Sports Commission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gasparilla Distance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/82

the rest of the field

15%

6,302/41,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

74 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

73/74

Grantees still filing

61/74

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$2,709,994Education$1,444,676Other$1,658,120Philanthropy$939,325International$286,000Arts & Culture$205,250Human Services$204,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL68.5× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Copperhead Charities Inc · Pinellas Community Foundation · Tampa Bay Sports Commission Inc · New York Yankees Tampa Foundation Inc · Lightning Foundation · University Community Hospital Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

33get no government money at all

3rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MORE HEALTH INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue held over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 593397472 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MORE HEALTH INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 22% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Florida Health Sciences Center Inc?

Find your warmest path to Florida Health Sciences Center Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

74 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Florida Health Sciences Center Inc?

More from the funding graph

FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

74 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Florida Health Sciences Center Inc?

More from the funding graph