Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

T-Serve Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$168k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$461kHousing & Shelter$343kEducation$94kPhilanthropy$88kReligion$38kHealth$31kInternational$13kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITYLINC$50,000
LAKEMARY CENTER ENDOWMENT ASSOC$50,000
KIDSTLC INC$35,000
HILLCREST HOPE$25,000
LINDA HALL LIBRARY$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 6%HEALING HOUSE: $5k → 15%PROJECT 1020: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 11 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$1.0M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+10%

Still filing today

45%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationReligionInternationalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LAKEMARY CENTER ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $246k · revenue +66%
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LINC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $237k · revenue +45%
  • KI
    KIDSTLC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $210k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNITY CHURCH OF OVERLAND PARK
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • HH
    HEALING HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -4%
  • HT
    HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Giving Hope Inc

Homelessness prevention

2
Healing to You

Healing to you provides mobile medical and mental health services to adults and children impacted by domestic violence and sexual assault. our goal is to close the gap in access to healthcare services to promote well being and heal the…

Health
3
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
4
Welcome House Inc

The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…

Health
5
Pathway to Recovery Inc

Operation of transitional and permanent housing programs.

Health
6
Grace to Grow

We provide a recovery community that includes outpatient treatment and community support. Providing a hand-up, not a hand out through collaborative partnerships, housing and support services.

Health
7
Hillcrest Washington Youth Home Inc

To impact lives and shape futures together by encouraging and educating youth and young adults on how to function in a family environment as well as to live independently in the community.

Health
8
Hiawatha Homes Inc

Provide residential, in-home, and community-based choices for people with disabilities.

9
Housing Services of Kansas City Inc

The Housing Services of Kansas City, Inc is focused on creating and preserving affordable housing for low income kansas city residents.

Housing & Shelter
10
The Healing Connection Residential Treatment Inc

To provide 24/7 residential treatment services to patients with eating disorders between the ages of 12 and 18.

11
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

12
Healthy Connections Inc

Improving the health and well-being of the communities we serve with a commitment to excellence in all that we do.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart to Heart International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project 10 20 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAKEMARY CENTER ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION — $245,500 · OtherLAKEMARY CENTER ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATIONKIDSTLC INC — $210,000 · OtherKIDSTLC INCUNITED WAY — $87,500 · OtherUNITED WAY+11 more — $92,000 · Other+11 moreCOMMUNITY LINC — $237,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY LINCHILLCREST MINISTRIES INC — $100,730 · ReligionHILLCREST …Give Something Back A NJ Nonprofit Corporation — $75,000 · EducationHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC — $12,500 · InternationalHEALING HOUSE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 10 20 INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$635,000Housing & Shelter$237,000Religion$100,730Education$75,000International$12,500Human Services$10,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAKEMARY CENTER ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION — $245,500 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LINC — $237,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetKIDSTLC INC — $210,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHILLCREST MINISTRIES INC — $100,730 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetGive Something Back A NJ Nonprofit Corporation — $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING HOUSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT 10 20 INC — $5,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAKEMARY CENTER ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LINC
  • Who funds KIDSTLC INC
  • Who funds HILLCREST MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds Give Something Back A NJ Nonprofit Corporation
  • Who funds HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds HEALING HOUSE INC
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
  • Who funds PROJECT 10 20 INC
  • Who funds YOUTHRIVE CORPORATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization T-Serve Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph