Skip to content

· Private foundation

Syal Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$115kReligion$39kHousing & Shelter$31kRecreation & Sports$30kInternational$20kFood & Nutrition$16kEducation$10kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$50,000
SEWA AIFW$15,000
CHILDRENS HEARTLINK$11,000
PINE TREE APPLE TENNIS CLASSIC$10,000
HENNEPIN THEATER DISTRICT$5,000
HINDU SOCIETY OF MN$5,000
MY VERY OWN BED$5,000
EMERGE$2,500
FEDERATION OF GITA ASHRAMA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CHANGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%CHANGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%CHANGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%SEWA AIFW: $50k → 11%SEWA AIFW: $50k → 11%SEWA AIFW: $15k → 11%SEWA AIFW: $10k → 11%ASIAN WOMEN UNITED OF MN: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$260k · 15 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
24

Total granted

$260k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
-1%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SEWA-AIFW
    4× · 2022–2025 · $125k · revenue +92%
  • CF
    CHANCE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +62%
  • MV
    My Very Own Bed
    3× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • FO
    FEDERATION OF GITA ASHRAMS OF AMERI
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • PT
    PINE TREE APPLE TENIS CLASSIC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • PT
    PINEE TREE APPLE TENNIS CLASSIC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Woman's Place

A woman's place envisions a society where all individuals are safe in their relationships and can thrive.

—
2
Childs Place

The mission of Childs Place is to listen to children in a safe developmentally sensitive and legally sound manner; to unite professionals in a coordinated response to child abuse; to guide children and families toward healing through…

Human Services
3
The Dwelling Place

The Dwelling Place is a Christ-centered ministry providing healing and hope to victims of domestic abuse through supportive services and a safe, transitional place to call home.

Human Services
4
World Without Orphans Global

World without orphans (wwo) global's vision is that every child would grow up in a safe and loving family, know their heavenly father, and reach their god-given purpose. wwo global's mission is to call and equip national leaders to…

International
5
Noah's Animal House Foundation

To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.

Animals
6
Mukti International

Mukti is a Sanskrit word that means "freedom from oppression and exploitation". Our goal is to see women and children find pathways to freedom. We partner with organizations around Asia that are on the frontlines helping to rescue and…

Crime & Legal
7
Phumulani

Preventing domestic violence and sexual abuse in communities of color throughout minnesota and the nation. by providing culturally-specific resources to women and girls of african descent, we hope to change the cycle of gender-based abuse…

Social Science
8
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
9
Home First - Interfaith Housing and Family Services

Home-first offers permanent solutions to homelessness by providing transitional housing and permanent housing, homelessness prevention assitance and support services to strengthen families and build commun

—
10
The First Step Home Inc

To create compassionate pathways for women's addiction recovery through an integrated continuum of services to achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
11
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
12
Haven of Hope Inc

Shelter for battered women and children

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is H2O for Life; the most unlike its peers is Babies Born Addicted. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EMERGE: $32,501 · OtherEMERGEWHITE BEAR FOOD SHELF: $15,000 · OtherWHITE BEAR FOOD SHELFFEDERATION OF GITA ASHRAMA: $13,500 · OtherFEDERATION OF GITA ASHRAMACHILDREN'S HEARTLINK: $11,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEARTLINKGITA ASHRAM: $11,000 · OtherGITA ASHRAMFEDERATION OF GITA ASHRAMS OF AMERI: $10,000 · OtherPINE TREE APPLE TENIS CLASSIC: $10,000 · OtherPINEE TREE APPLE TENNIS CLASSIC: $10,000 · OtherPINE TREE APPLE TENNIS CLASSIC: $10,000 · OtherINE TREE APPLE TENIS CLASSIC: $10,000 · OtherNAI DISHA FREE EDUCATION SOCIETY: $7,803 · Other+21 more: $59,500 · Other+21 moreSEWA-AIFW: $125,000 · Human ServicesSEWA-AIFWCHANCE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesCHANCE FOUNDATIONAsian Women United of Minnesota: $5,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $50,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHIL…My Very Own Bed: $12,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM OF STARK COU: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEPPING STONE EMERGENCY HOUSING: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterCASTING FOR RECOVERY: $5,000 · HealthBABIES BORN ADDICTED: $1,000 · HealthPROJECT MEXICO OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH: $2,500 · InternationalH2O FOR LIFE: $2,200 · InternationalLove First: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Other$200,304Human Services$145,000Philanthropy$50,000Housing & Shelter$24,500Health$6,000International$4,700Civil Rights$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEWA-AIFW: $125,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHANCE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetMy Very Own Bed: $12,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEARTLINK: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM OF STARK COU: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCASTING FOR RECOVERY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAsian Women United of Minnesota: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetA CHILD'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAN DO CANINES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPING STONE EMERGENCY HOUSING: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT MEXICO OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetH2O FOR LIFE: $2,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLove First: $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBABIES BORN ADDICTED: $1,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEWA-AIFW ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CHANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds My Very Own Bed ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEARTLINK ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM OF STARK COU ↗
  • Who funds CASTING FOR RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds Asian Women United of Minnesota ↗
  • Who funds A CHILD'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONE EMERGENCY HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT MEXICO OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds PILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds H2O FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Love First ↗
  • Who funds BABIES BORN ADDICTED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Syal Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Syal Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Syal Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Syal Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Syal’s filings →

    More from the funding graph