Skip to content

· Public charity

Swim Across America Inc

Saa hosts charity swims with the proceeds funding cancer research, prevention and treatment.

$8.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$755k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$45M
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+14 grants · $6.5M
$200,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$7.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center$755,000
Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy$675,000
Cancer Support Team of Westchester$600,000
UCSF Foundation$575,000
NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL$550,000
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center$500,000
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and The Jimmy Fund$460,000
Weill Cornell Cancer Center$415,000
Children's Hospital of NY-Columbia Presbyter$355,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$350,000
Johns Hopkins University$340,000
MD Anderson Cancer Center$335,000
Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute$335,000
Siteman Cancer Center$250,000
Rush University Cancer Center$235,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL: $550k → 6%UCSF Foundation: $575k → 10%CANCER SUPPORT TEAM OF WESTCHESTER: $519k → 9%Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: $755k → 17%Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy: $675k → 9%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $355k → 14%Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $500k → 9%Johns Hopkins: $445k → 19%NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL: $450k → 6%UCSF Foundation: $445k → 10%CANCER SUPPORT TEAM OF WESTCHESTER: $500k → 9%Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: $585k → 17%Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy: $575k → 9%SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE: $450k → 9%Johns Hopkins University: $419k → 19%NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL: $375k → 6%UCSF Foundation: $420k → 10%CANCER SUPPORT TEAM OF WESTCHESTER: $443k → 9%Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: $500k → 17%ALLIANCE FOR CANCER GENE THERAPY: $385k → 9%Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $450k → 9%THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $415k → 19%UCSF Foundation: $420k → 10%CANCER SUPPORT TEAM OF WESTCHESTER: $401k → 9%Weill Cornell Cancer Center: $415k → 17%ALLIANCE FOR CANCER GENE THERAPY: $385k → 9%SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE: $425k → 9%Johns Hopkins: $400k → 19%ALLIANCE FOR CANCER GENE THERAPY: $365k → 9%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $550k → 14%SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE: $405k → 9%THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $390k → 19%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and The Jimmy Fund: $475k → 16%Cancer Support Team of Westchester: $600k → 9%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $500k → 14%SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE: $370k → 9%THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $380k → 19%Cancer Support Team of Westchester: $575k → 9%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $365k → 14%THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $375k → 19%Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and The Jimmy Fund: $460k → 16%Cancer Support Team of Westchester: $570k → 9%CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA: $360k → 14%Cancer Support Team of Westchester: $550k → 9%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $722k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $523k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $520k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $455k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$54M · 39 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
1

Total granted

$54M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+68%

Still filing today

77%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyScience & TechArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +70% · 39% of their budget
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CANCER GENE THERAPY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +201%
  • FH
    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +355%

Funded once

  • FC
    FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $27k · revenue +68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
3
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc

The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.

Health
4
University Medical Center Inc

To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.

Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
7
Northwell Health Cancer Institute Inc

Northwell health cancer institute is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
8
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
9
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
12
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins All Children's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Palliative and Supportive Care of Nantucket Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
27/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC: $4,307,004 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT TEAM INCFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $3,510,000 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $3,324,000 · HealthTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITALCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $3,150,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INCRush University Medical Center: $1,935,000 · HealthRush University Medical CenterDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,820,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncBaylor University Medical Center: $1,521,422 · HealthBaylor University Medical CenterATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,390,000 · HealthWOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI: $1,265,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado: $1,200,000 · HealthColumbia Presbyterian Medical Center Fund Inc: $1,017,950 · Health+12 more: $3,945,133 · Health+12 moreMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $4,668,797 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCE…NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL: $2,930,000 · OtherNANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITALUTMD ANDERSON: $2,423,000 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $1,645,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORA…Weill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $1,380,000 · OtherWeill Medical College of Corne…PASCON: $815,000 · OtherPASCON+4 more: $982,000 · Other+4 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $4,150,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,632,500 · EducationWASHINGTON UN…Vanderbilt University: $305,000 · EducationMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $285,000 · Education+1 more: $155,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CANCER GENE THERAPY INC: $3,555,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $26,975 · PhilanthropyCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $975,000 · Science & TechINTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME: $19,740 · Arts & Culture
Health$28,385,509Other$14,843,797Education$6,527,500Philanthropy$3,581,975Science & Tech$975,000Arts & Culture$19,740

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC: $4,307,004 over 9y, 39% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $4,150,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CANCER GENE THERAPY INC: $3,555,000 over 9y, 22% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $3,510,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $3,324,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $3,150,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $1,935,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,820,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,632,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor University Medical Center: $1,521,422 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,390,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI: $1,265,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado: $1,200,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetColumbia Presbyterian Medical Center Fund Inc: $1,017,950 over 5y, 37% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $975,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $660,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $575,711 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Association for Cancer Research Inc: $460,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMIAMI CANCER INSTITUTE AT BAPTIST HEALTH INC: $390,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $377,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $371,422 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY: $370,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN: $360,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $305,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $285,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST OR OVARIAN CANCER INC: $171,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetPALLIATIVE AND SUPPORTIVE CARE OF NANTUCKET FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $155,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS FOUNDATION INC: $26,975 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME: $19,740 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGlen Cove CARES Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 22% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CANCER GENE THERAPY INC ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Baylor University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado ↗
  • Who funds Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Association for Cancer Research Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI CANCER INSTITUTE AT BAPTIST HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST OR OVARIAN CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds PALLIATIVE AND SUPPORTIVE CARE OF NANTUCKET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd ↗
  • Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Society IncGA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Swim Across America Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Swim Across America Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Swim Across America Inc?

Find your warmest path to Swim Across America Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Swim Across America’s filings →

More from the funding graph