Skip to content
Susan B Anthony List Education Fund at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Susan B Anthony List Education Fund

Susan B.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.4MCivil Rights$670kArts & Culture$275kHuman Services$269kEducation$220kReligion$25kInternational$10kCrime & Legal$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$60,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AAPLOG$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%The Center for Medical Progress: $300k → 10%Ann & Phelim Media LLC: $250k → 14%40 Days for Life: $200k → 22%March for Life: $100k → 14%New Life Solutions Inc: $20k → 12%The Family Leader Foundation Inc: $20k → 10%American Association of Pro Life OBGYN: $200k → 15%Strength and Prosperity Project Fund: $20k → 16%AAPLOG: $60k → 12%Life Issues Institute: $175k → 16%CatholicVote Education Fund: $100k → 14%Global Centurion Foundation Inc: $10k → 6%Live Action: $100k → 7%Students for Life of America: $200k → 8%Center for Medical Progress: $220k → 10%Ann & Phelim Media LLC: $15k → 14%Unreported Story Society: $10k → 14%Watson Bowes Research Institute (Project of AAPLOG): $9k → 12%Thomas More Society: $20k → 14%Contend Projects: $12k → 7%Center for Medical Progress: $100k → 10%Napa Institute Legal Foundation: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
IA
IN
OH
CA
KY
VA
KS
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 4 repeat orgs$995k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
15

Total granted

$1.8M
$995k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+19%

Still filing today

75%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsEducationHealthReligionCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    Life Issues Institute Inc
    3× · 2018–2022 · $695k · revenue -16% · 31% of their budget
  • TC
    The Center For Medical Progress
    3× · 2017–2019 · $620k · revenue +95% · 36% of their budget
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS
    3× · 2019–2024 · $269k · revenue +291% · 45% of their budget

Funded once

  • SF
    Students for Life of America Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +51%
  • 4D
    40 DAYS FOR LIFE
    one grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue +19%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR A HUMAN LIFE AMENDMENT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +11% · 29% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
2
Pro-Life Action League Inc

Dissemination of pro-life information

Civil Rights
3
Americans United for Life Inc

AUL is an organization that advances the human right to life in culture, law, and policy.

Civil Rights
4
Indiana Right to Life Incorporated

To educate the public about abortion

—
5
Life Advancement Group

To rescue lives from the destruction of abortion through innovative marketing, strategy, and technology solutions.

—
6
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
7
Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc

Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.

—
8
Pro-Life Action Ministries Inc

Pro-Life Action Ministries, Inc. is an interdenominational Christian organization dedicated to publicly defending the sanctity of human life & saving lives from abortion, infanticide & euthanasia through peaceful direct-action & education…

—
9
Massachusetts Citizens for Life Inc

To foster respect for human life and to defend the right to life of all human beings, born and unborn.

—
10
Protect Life Michigan

Protect life michigan (plmi) is organized to promote a culture of life on college campuses in michigan. the organization's mission is to end abortion by (1) recruiting and training students for pro-life leadership, (2) educating youth on…

Civil Rights
11
Sidewalk Advocates for Life

Sidewalk advocates for life offers a peaceful, prayerful, law-abiding program that teaches community volunteers how to reach hearts outside the abortion facility and offer loving, life-affirming alternatives.

Health
12
National Pro-Life Alliance Inc

Scholarship, research and analysis on sanctity of human life; physical and emotional effects of abortion; sponsors public policy and government forums; publish results; educate public;

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Students for Life of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Unreported Story Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Life Issues Institute Inc: $694,533 · OtherLife Issues Institute IncASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS: $269,000 · OtherASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTSAnn & Phelim Media LLC: $264,584 · OtherAnn & Phelim Media LLCNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR A HUMAN LIFE AMENDMENT INC: $150,000 · OtherNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR A HUMAN LIFE AMENDMENT INC+2 more: $31,500 · OtherThe Center For Medical Progress: $619,750 · HealthThe Center For Medical Pr…+1 more: $20,000 · HealthStudents for Life of America Inc: $200,000 · Civil RightsStudents for Life o…FIDELIS CENTER FOR LAW & POLICY: $100,000 · Civil RightsFIDELIS CENTER FOR …LIVE ACTION: $100,000 · Civil RightsLIVE ACTIONMARCH FOR LIFE ACTION: $100,000 · Civil RightsMARCH FOR LIFE ACTI…40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $200,000 · EducationTHE FAMILY LEADER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationGlobal Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE: $25,000 · ReligionNAPA INSTITUTE LEGAL FOUNDATION: $8,000 · ReligionTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $20,000 · Crime & LegalGLOBAL CENTURION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalUnreported Story Society: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,409,617Health$639,750Civil Rights$500,000Education$220,000Religion$33,000Crime & Legal$30,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLife Issues Institute Inc: $694,533 over 3y, 31% of budgetThe Center For Medical Progress: $619,750 over 3y, 36% of budgetASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS: $269,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $200,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR A HUMAN LIFE AMENDMENT INC: $150,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetFIDELIS CENTER FOR LAW & POLICY: $100,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $100,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGlobal Impact Ministries Inc DBA LOVE LIFE: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE FAMILY LEADER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTRENGTH AND PROSPERITY PROJECT FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGLOBAL CENTURION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetUnreported Story Society: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNAPA INSTITUTE LEGAL FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bradley Impact Fund I…Natl Christian Charit…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Bradley Impact Fund IncWI13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Susan B Anthony List Education Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Susan B Anthony List Education Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Susan B Anthony List Education Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Susan B Anthony List Education Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Susan B Anthony List Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home