Skip to content

· Private foundation

Surendra and Kala Jain Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$388kEducation$261kHealth$169kSocial Science$58kFood & Nutrition$22kCrime & Legal$17kRecreation & Sports$7kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$256k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SRI PANCHAMUKHA HANUMAN TEMPLE$25,000
CHILDREN'S BUREAU$20,000
LUSKIN ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE$10,100
ARIHANT INSTITUTE$10,000
TORRANCE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$1,000
KIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL$800
JAIN CENTER OF SO CAL$402
VIJAY AMRITRAJ FOUNDATION$350
Individual grant recipient$79
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 70% of grant dollars ($656k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 30% that went abroad ($288k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JOHN TRACY CENTER: $250 → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $575 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 30% of all-years giving ($288k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$287k · 3 grants
Tanzania$265 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$404k · 21 repeat orgs$540k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
46

Total granted

$404k
$530k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+41%

Still filing today

38%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    Torrance Memorial Medical Center Health Care Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $104k · revenue +174%
  • VA
    VIJAY AMRITRAJ FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $58k · revenue +11%
  • OI
    ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $23k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • SH
    SHRI HATHUNDI RATAMAHAVIR TEMPLE
    one grant, 2022 · $285k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Los Angeles Mission College Foundation

The specific purpose for which the los angeles mission college foundation has been established is to advance the college's educational and cultural goals.

—
4
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
5
University of California Merced Foundation

The uc merced foundation was formed for the purpose of encouraging voluntary private gifts, trusts, and bequests for the benefit of the university of california, merced.

Education
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
California State University Los Angeles Foundation

To advance the educational, cultural, scholarly, and creative activities and the role of community service of csula by increasing private funding, responsibly managing donated resources and supporting the university and its diverse and…

Education
8
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
9
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
10
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
11
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
12
Altamed Foundation

To support the activities and purposes of altamed health services corporation, a california nonprofit public benefit corporation "ahsc", a section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orthopaedic Institute for Children Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Umanoorg. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHRI HATHUNDI RATAMAHAVIR TEMPLE: $285,000 · OtherSHRI HATHUNDI RATAMAHAVIR TEMPLEIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDRENS BUREAU: $91,179 · OtherCHILDRENS BUREAUSRI PANCHAMUKHA HANUMAN TEMPLE: $57,376 · OtherSRI PANCHAMUKHA HANUMAN TEMPLEIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJAIN CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $25,000 · Other+48 more: $119,464 · Other+48 moreTorrance Memorial Medical Center Health Care Foundation: $103,800 · HealthTorrance Memori…ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $22,520 · HealthORTHOPAEDIC INS…+2 more: $2,101 · HealthVIJAY AMRITRAJ FOUNDATION: $57,575 · Social ScienceARIHANTA INSTITUTE: $10,000 · EducationROADDS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationPENINSULA LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Education+3 more: $1,250 · EducationAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $10,000 · Food & NutritionKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,725 · InternationalYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $1,575 · Human ServicesJOHN TRACY CLINIC: $250 · Human Services
Other$728,019Health$128,421Social Science$57,575Education$15,250Food & Nutrition$10,000International$2,725Human Services$1,825

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTorrance Memorial Medical Center Health Care Foundation: $103,800 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVIJAY AMRITRAJ FOUNDATION: $57,575 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $22,520 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIHANTA INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLACER Foundation: $5,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEL CAMINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE District Foundation: $3,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROADDS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $1,575 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUMANOORG: $1,105 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES COUNTRY CLUB: $1,001 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SANTA MONICA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $251 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN TRACY CLINIC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $159 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Torrance Memorial Medical Center Health Care Foundation ↗
  • Who funds VIJAY AMRITRAJ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ARIHANTA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
  • Who funds LACER Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EL CAMINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE District Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ROADDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BIDADA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds UMANOORG ↗
  • Who funds THE LOS ANGELES COUNTRY CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kenneth T and Eileen L Norris FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kenneth T and Eileen L Norris Foundation · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Surendra and Kala Jain Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Surendra and Kala Jain Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Surendra and Kala Jain Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Surendra and Kala Jain Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Surendra and Kala Jain’s filings →

    More from the funding graph