Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sumac Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$415k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Civil Rights$487kHuman Services$447kFood & Nutrition$393kArts & Culture$300kHousing & Shelter$265kYouth Development$257kInternational$205kPublic Safety & Disaster$105kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $340k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$59,500
CASA CENTRAL$45,000
SECOND STORY YOUTH SERVICES AND SAF$40,000
MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE$40,000
ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$35,000
RESURRECTION PROJECT$35,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$30,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$25,000
GLOBAL REFUGE$20,000
BEYOND HUNGER$15,000
NORTHBROOK FOOD PANTRY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CASA CATALINA FOOD PANTRY$15,000
CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS RIGHT$10,000
OAK PARK HOMELESS COALITION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $447k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SARAH'S INN: $5k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $5k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $5k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $3k → 14%SARAHS INN: $3k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $3k → 14%SARAHS INN: $3k → 14%ALTERNATIVE HOUSE: $25k → 6%CASA CENTRAL: $45k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $40k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $40k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $35k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $35k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $35k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $35k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $30k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $30k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $30k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $20k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 24 repeat orgs$162k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
6

Total granted

$2.5M
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+264%

Still filing today

46%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementInternationalCivil RightsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Resurrection Project
    8× · 2018–2025 · $255k · revenue +247%
  • EN
    ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $235k · revenue +88%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $185k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • AA
    ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +75%
  • 1S
    1ST STAGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +264%
  • OT
    OLNEY THEATRE CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
2
Refugee & Immigrant Center for Education & Legal Services

To deliver legal and social services to people and families who want to put down roots in the u.s. and cultivate welcoming communities that uphold our collective freedoms.

Civil Rights
3
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
4
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
5
Chicago Refugee Coalition

The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.

Human Services
6
Community Health Partnership of Illinois

Strive to improve the health and well being of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and other medically vulnerable populations by providing quality accessable, affordable, and culturally responsive health care within the community we serve.

Health
7
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
8
Illinois Community for Displaced Immigrants

Serving recently arrived migrants and asylum seekers in the Chicagoland area and is committed to upholding the dignity and human rights of immigrants.

Human Services
9
Greater Chicago Food Depository

The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…

Food & Nutrition
10
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
11
Arise Chicago

Arise chicago builds partnerships between faith communities and workers to fight workplace injustice through education, organizing, and advocating for public policy changes.

Employment
12
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa Central Social Services Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Purple Asparagus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASA CATALINA FOOD PANTRY: $225,000 · OtherCASA CATALINA FOOD PANTRYSECOND STORY YOUTH SERVICES AND SAF: $190,000 · OtherSECOND STORY YOUTH SERVICES AND SAFGALA HISPANIC THEATRE: $140,000 · OtherGALA HISPANIC THEATRESECOND STORY YOUTH SERVICES AND SAFE SHELTERS: $67,000 · OtherSECOND STORY YOUTH SERVICES AND SAFE SHELTER…Individual grant recipient: $59,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTHBROOK FOOD PANTRY: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $36,000 · Other+13 more: $215,000 · Other+13 moreERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $235,000 · Human ServicesERIE NEIGHBORHOOD H…CASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $160,000 · Human ServicesCASA CENTRAL SOCIAL…SARAH'S INN: $27,000 · Human ServicesSARAH'S INNABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesABUSED AND HOMELESS…MALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $423,500 · Civil RightsMALDEF - MEXICAN A…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $185,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $105,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRA…The Resurrection Project: $255,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Resurr…GALA INC GRUPO DE ARTISTAS LATINO AMERICANOS: $128,000 · Arts & Culture1ST STAGE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureBEYOND HUNGER: $52,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,037,500Human Services$447,000Civil Rights$423,500International$290,000Housing & Shelter$255,000Arts & Culture$148,000Food & Nutrition$52,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $423,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetThe Resurrection Project: $255,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $235,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $185,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $160,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGALA INC GRUPO DE ARTISTAS LATINO AMERICANOS: $128,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $105,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND HUNGER: $52,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION: $31,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSARAH'S INN: $27,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetIllinois Coalition for Community Services: $25,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPurple Asparagus: $15,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
  • Who funds ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GALA INC GRUPO DE ARTISTAS LATINO AMERICANOS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds SARAH'S INN ↗
  • Who funds ABUSED AND HOMELESS CHILDREN'S REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Coalition for Community Services ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds 1ST STAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Purple Asparagus ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL15.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Healthy Communities Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sumac Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sumac Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge: 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sumac’s filings →

More from the funding graph