Skip to content
Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation

Structured Employment Economic Development Corporations (seedco) mission is to advance economic opportunity for people, businesses, and communities in need as such, seedco designs and implements innovative programs and services that benefit workers, families, and businesses across the country each year, seedco supports communities…

$941k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$5.4MHuman Services$743kHealth$353kInternational$125kEducation$59kFood & Nutrition$46kHousing & Shelter$21k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $417,377, the rows itemized in this filing. The $940,955 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $523,578 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $194k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $206k
$36,900
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC$95,095
Union Hospital of Cecil County$56,094
Interfaith Service Coalition Of Hancock Maryland$55,293
ASYLEE WOMEN ENTERPRISE$45,400
Chesapeake Multi-Cultural CTR RESOURCE CTR$42,057
PAUL'S PLACE INC$36,900
EASTERN SHORE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER$24,927
Franciscan Center$22,217
Humanim$11,811
BON SECOURS COMMUNITY WORKS$10,918
Shepherd's Clinic$9,694
People Encouraging People$6,971
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRONXWORKS INC: $340k → 28%THE CENTER OF HELP INC: $27k → 6%BRONXWORKS INC: $333k → 28%CENTER OF HELP: $21k → 6%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $7k → 11%BRONXWORKS INC: $322k → 28%THE CENTER OF HELP INC: $14k → 6%BRONXWORKS INC: $285k → 28%THE CENTER OF HELP INC: $13k → 6%THE CENTER OF HELP INC: $12k → 6%CENTER OF HELP: $10k → 6%BON SECOURS COMMUNITY WORKS: $175k → 19%Arundel House of Hope: $21k → 6%BON SECOURS COMMUNITY WORKS: $129k → 19%BON SECOURS COMMUNITY WORKS: $119k → 19%BON SECOURS COMMUNITY WORKS: $16k → 19%BON SECOURS COMMUNITY WORKS: $11k → 19%BON SECOURS COMMUNITY WORKS: $8k → 19%Franciscan Center: $22k → 19%CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC: $100k → 19%CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC: $95k → 19%CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC: $93k → 19%CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC: $81k → 19%CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC: $76k → 19%CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC: $38k → 19%CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC: $29k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.5M · 13 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$6.5M
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+26%

Still filing today

92%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentEducationInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BRONXWORKS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.3M · revenue +128%
  • SI
    STRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.2M · revenue +77%
  • CC
    CASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $511k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • JO
    JOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $57k · revenue -70%
  • PG
    PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $44k · revenue +14%
  • AH
    ARUNDEL HOUSE OF HOPE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Esperanza Center Health Services Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve, and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

—
2
Baltimore Area Health Education Center

To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings to transform the health of underserved…

Health
3
Health Care for the Homeless Inc

Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.

—
4
St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families

St. Anns Center helps mothers and children overcome crisis and achieve lasting independence and stability by providing a safe and supportive home, child care, education and employment assistance, and clinical social work services within a…

Human Services
5
Maryland Community Health Initiatives

The organization served approximately 5,000 people - more than 100 people take part in services offered at penn-north each day. clinical services are provided to over 800 clients per year.

Health
6
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians Inc

Johns hopkins community physicians, inc (jhcp), a valued member of johns hopkins medicine, is a network of medical practices strategically positioned throughout communities in maryland and dc. we strive to meet the needs of each community…

—
7
Coordinating Center for Home and Community Care Inc

The mission of The Coordinating Center is to partner with people of all ages and abilities and those who support them in the community to achieve their aspirations for independence, health, and a meaningful community life.

Human Services
8
Christian Care Communities Inc Group Return

Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living. 24-hour skilled nursing…

Human Services
9
Cherry Hill Town Center Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve, and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

Community Improvement
10
Bethany Community Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "Inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

—
11
Trinity House Apartments Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "Inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

Human Services
12
Spanish-Speaking Community of Maryland Inc

To provide direct services and work with public and private organizations throughout maryland to ensure the most vulnerable residents receive essential guidance for nutrition, health care, education, housing, employment and immigration…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humanim Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bronxworks Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRONXWORKS INC: $1,280,073 · Human ServicesBRONXWORKS INCCASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC: $511,111 · Human ServicesCASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INCBon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc: $458,094 · Human ServicesBon Secours Baltimore Community Works In…CENTER OF HELP: $96,133 · Human Services+3 more: $50,152 · Human ServicesEASTERN SHORE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENT: $1,439,351 · HealthEASTERN SHORE AREA HEALTH EDUC…UNION HOSPITAL OF CECIL COUNTY INC: $335,945 · HealthUNION HOSPITAL OF CECIL COUNTY…+2 more: $38,718 · HealthSTRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,201,012 · EmploymentSTRIVE INTERNATIONAL …JOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC: $56,934 · EmploymentTRIANGLE HEALTH ALLIANCE INC (wholly owned sub of UHCC Ventures Inc): $659,394 · OtherTRIANGLE HEALT…INTERFAITH SERVICE COALITION OF HANCOCK MARYLAND INC: $159,469 · OtherINTERFAITH SER…+4 more: $53,453 · Other+4 moreCHESAPEAKE MULTICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER INC: $153,164 · EducationPRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $44,245 · EducationAsylee Women Enterprise Inc: $124,994 · InternationalPAUL'S PLACE INC: $46,125 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$2,395,563Health$1,814,014Employment$1,257,946Other$872,316Education$197,409International$124,994Food & Nutrition$46,125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEASTERN SHORE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENT: $1,439,351 over 8y, 27% of budgetBRONXWORKS INC: $1,280,073 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSTRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,201,012 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetCASH CAMPAIGN OF MARYLAND INC: $511,111 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetBon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc: $458,094 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetUNION HOSPITAL OF CECIL COUNTY INC: $335,945 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINTERFAITH SERVICE COALITION OF HANCOCK MARYLAND INC: $159,469 over 4y, 12% of budgetCHESAPEAKE MULTICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER INC: $153,164 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetAsylee Women Enterprise Inc: $124,994 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCENTER OF HELP: $96,133 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetJOB OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCE INC: $56,934 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPAUL'S PLACE INC: $46,125 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $44,245 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHUMANIM INC: $31,747 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $22,217 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARUNDEL HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $20,694 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSHEPHERDS CLINIC INC: $9,694 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $7,241 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE ENCOURAGING PEOPLE INC: $6,971 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of Cen…The Harry and Jeanett…Baltimore Civic Fund …The Abell Foundation …Baltimore Community F…Annie E Casey Foundat…Leonard and Helen R S…The Marion I & Henry …Truist Foundation IncShare Our StrengthZanvyl and Isabelle K…Alliance for Open Soc…
The United Way of Central Maryland IncMD21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Baltimore Civic Fund Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Leonard and Helen R Stulman Charitable · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · Share Our Strength · Zanvyl and Isabelle Krieger Fund Inc · Alliance for Open Society Int'L Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Structured Employment Economic Development Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Paul's Place Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Asylee Women Enterprise Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Eastern Shore Area Health Education Cent: 21% of income from government
  • Cash Campaign of Maryland Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Interfaith Service Coalition of Hancock Maryland Inc: 5% of income from government
  • People Encouraging People Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Franciscan Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Humanim Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Structured Employment Economic Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home