· Private foundation
Strott Family Fdn-Dima
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of STROTT FAMILY FDN-DIMA’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $3,000 |
| TRANSFIGURATION OF OUR LORD PARISH | $1,820 |
| ST JOSEPH'S PREPARATORY SCHOOL | $1,820 |
| HOLY NAME OF JESUS-ST GREGORY THE GREAT | $1,775 |
| HOLY TRINITY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH | $1,775 |
| XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL | $1,770 |
| ST NORBERT CATHOLIC CHURCH | $1,350 |
| T&E CARE (TREDYFFRIN & EASTTOWN CARE) | $1,020 |
| JOSEPH'S HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC | $1,000 |
| SAMARITAN CENTER INC | $1,000 |
| A TINY HOME FOR GOOD | $1,000 |
| HOLY FAMILY CHURCH - FOOD PANTRY | $1,000 |
| WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY | $1,000 |
| GOLD STAR SAILING | $1,000 |
| BERWYN FIRE COMPANY | $850 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
DUKE UNIVERSITY7× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +44%- POPARENTS OF PS 9 INC4× · 2019–2022 · $8k · revenue +13%
- JHJOSEPH'S HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC5× · 2019–2025 · $5k · revenue +212%
Funded once
- CLCITY LAX INCone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $2k
- TCTHE COLLEGE CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
It is the mission of carefirst ny, inc. to affirm life through extraordinary, compassionate support and care to patients and families in chemung, steuben and schuyler counties.
To educate the public of the inviolability and inherent dignity of all human life.
The foundation supports the law school in its mission to increase access to legal education to those from groups underrepresented in the profession and to prepare its graduates for public interest and public service practice.
The organization provides women in crisis pregnancies alternatives to abortion, regardless of their religion, race or position in life and to help them come to a decision they and their babies can live the rest of their lives.
Life teen is a missionary youth movement within the catholic church. we believe that eucharist-based ministry has the power to transform teens, transform parishes, and transform culture. our top priorities are resourcing and (continued on…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.
The mission of calvary hospital is to care for the medical, emotional and spiritual needs of our adult patients with advanced cancer and other life-limiting illnesses. it is the only fully accredited acute care hospital in the u.s. devoted…
Human Life Services is a life affirming Christ-centered pregnancy care organization serving York through medical services, peer counseling, education and community referrals.
Bon secours new york health system, inc. (bsnyhs) is the parent and central organization of an established integrated healthcare delivery system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Students for Life of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PARENTS OF PS 9 INC ↗
- Who funds JOSEPH'S HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds TREDYFFRIN & EASTTOWN CARE ↗
- Who funds BERWYN FIRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROAD TO EMMAUS MINISTRY OF SYRACUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PTA OF MS 54 INC ↗
- Who funds The Bev Hartig Huntingtons Disease Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GOLD STAR SAILING ↗
- Who funds WEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE ↗
- Who funds CITY LAX INC ↗
- Who funds STONE HARBOR RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds A TINY HOME FOR GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds MEMORIES FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGE CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Erben Organ Inc ↗
- Who funds Global Family Care Network Inc ↗
- Who funds Travis Manion Foundation ↗
- Who funds LUCY OUTREACH A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE BRANCHES OUTREACH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chubb Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Dorothy and Marshall M Reisman Foundation · Jim and Juli Boeheim Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Strott Family Fdn-Dima funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.