Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stonisch Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$210k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$659kHousing & Shelter$475kEducation$335kArts & Culture$176kInternational$93kReligion$70kYouth Development$45kHuman Services$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFE BUILDERS$75,000
CHICONDI MALAWI$30,000
NEW HOPE$25,000
GTI$20,000
BELLAIRE YOUTH INITIATIVE$17,000
U OF D MERCY$10,000
BARABAS$10,000
ALBION COLLEGE$10,000
FREE REIN$5,000
THE PARADE COMPANY$5,000
ELIZABETH COURAGE FUND$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LIFE BUILDERS: $100k → 21%LIFE BUILDERS: $100k → 21%LIFE BUILDERS: $100k → 21%LIFE BUILDERS: $100k → 21%LIFE BUILDERS: $75k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
OH
NJ
CA
NC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 13 repeat orgs$303k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$1.5M
$221k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+21%

Still filing today

46%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • L
    LifeBUILDERS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $475k · revenue +41%
  • AM
    AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $145k · revenue +127%
  • AI
    ARTIS-NAPLES INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $130k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • C4
    CLIMB 4 KIDNEY CANCER
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • BY
    BELLAIRE YOUTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
4
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
5
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
6
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
7
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
8
Siena University

Siena university is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…

Education
9
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
10
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
11
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
12
The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College

Located in south hadley, massachusetts, mount holyoke college is a highly selective, nondenominational, residential, research liberal arts college for women that is gender-diverse and welcomes applications from female, transgender, and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Albion College; the most unlike its peers is Sauve Art Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATIO: $425,000 · OtherROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATIOWAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $75,000 · OtherWAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINECLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONCLIMB 4 KIDNEY CANCER: $50,000 · OtherCLIMB 4 KIDNEY CANCERBARABAS: $45,000 · OtherGOLISANO CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $31,000 · Other+17 more: $192,000 · Other+17 moreLifeBUILDERS: $475,000 · Human ServicesLifeBUILDERSAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC: $145,000 · EducationAVE MARIA UNIVERSIT…HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $135,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEUNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY LIGGETT …ALBION COLLEGE: $20,000 · EducationALBION COLLEGE+3 more: $21,750 · Education+3 moreARTIS-NAPLES INC: $130,000 · Arts & CultureSAUVE ART FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureCHIKONDI MALAWI: $93,000 · InternationalURBANPROMISE INTERNATIONAL: $3,400 · InternationalTHE HEALING CONNECTION INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE PARADE COMPANY: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsGROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $2,300 · Community Improvement
Other$868,000Human Services$475,000Education$341,750Arts & Culture$154,000International$96,400Health$5,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Community Improvement$2,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLifeBUILDERS: $475,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetAVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC: $145,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $135,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $130,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHIKONDI MALAWI: $93,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetUNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAUVE ART FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetALWAYS A JUDSON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALZHEIMERS SUPPORT NETWORK INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $6,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEALING CONNECTION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARADE COMPANY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBANPROMISE INTERNATIONAL: $3,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $2,300 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LifeBUILDERS ↗
  • Who funds AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIKONDI MALAWI ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY LIGGETT SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAUVE ART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALWAYS A JUDSON INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS SUPPORT NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALING CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY ↗
  • Who funds THE PARADE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds URBANPROMISE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stonisch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stonisch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Ave Maria University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stonisch’s filings →

More from the funding graph