· Private foundation
Stinchcomb Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $108k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $50,253 |
| GREATER ATLANTA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS | $40,450 |
| GRACE NEW HOPE | $37,500 |
| NG3 | $30,000 |
| AMERICAN RIVER BANK FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA | $5,000 |
| SAMFORD UNIVERSITY | $4,000 |
| PARACLETE MINISTRIES | $3,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES | $2,000 |
| UBORA MINISTRY | $1,000 |
| COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM | $1,000 |
| JAMES RELIEF PROJECT | $590 |
| LEUKEMIA SOCIETY | $500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA | $300 |
| ST JUDE | $200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GAGREATER ATLANTA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $99k · revenue +59%
- GTGeorgia Transplant Foundation Inc6× · 2017–2022 · $56k · revenue +11%
- HHHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC4× · 2018–2024 · $45k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- LILIVE2540 INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +51%
NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +46%- DSDONNIE SHELL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…
George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.
Thompson Cancer Survival Center provides support services for cancer patients, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
The mission of augusta health is to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.
Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…
Enable christian organizations worldwide to initiate and strenghten ministries that lead people to become followers of jesus and transform communities out of cycles of poverty and disease.
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…
Go ministries empowers local leaders to make disciples as god redeems people, renews communities and restores creation through mutual transformation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restore Life Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Donnie Shell Scholarship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER ATLANTA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds Georgia Transplant Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN RIVER BANK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Samford University ↗
- Who funds Promise686 Inc ↗
- Who funds LIVE2540 INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
- Who funds Extra Special People Inc ↗
- Who funds BLACK & GOLD CLASSIC INC ↗
- Who funds PARACLETE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds DONNIE SHELL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds PARKVIEW TOUCHDOWN CLUB ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds Piedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DIAKONOS INC ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT SPORTS MINISTRY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · The Gaby Family Foundation · Richard & Barbara Gaby Foundation · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc · Thames Family Foundation Inc · Lisa and Bob Cheeley Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stinchcomb Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stinchcomb Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Stinchcomb Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.