Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thames Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2019
29
Grants FY2019
13
States reached
$72k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Religion$280kInternational$156kEducation$142kAnimals$11kPhilanthropy$7kHuman Services$5kEnvironment$5kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2019 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k25 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
$2,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UBORATZ INC$71,500
PERIMETER CHURCH$48,017
MSU FOUNDATION$25,000
GEORGIA CENTER FOR OPPORTUNITY$20,000
CHRIST CHURCH MANDARIN$8,500
70X7 FOUNDATION$7,000
CHRIST HERITAGE FOUNDATION$6,000
FORUM OF CHRISTIAN LEADERS$6,000
RESOURCE 360$5,022
UNITED WORLD MISSION$4,000
GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,500
ROMANIAN CHRISTIAN ENTERPRISES$3,500
MISSION TO NORTH AMERICA$2,400
IFESUSA$2,050
JEFFERSON COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIV FOUNDATION: $29k → 24%STREET GRACE: $1k → 9%STREET GRACE: $520 → 9%STREET GRACE: $500 → 9%PROMISE 686: $2k → 9%PROMISE 686 INC: $2k → 9%PROMISE 686 INC: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MA
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$512k · 28 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +94% since the first grant, against +54% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2019, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
10

Total granted

$512k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+54%

Still filing today

54%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitInternationalEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UI
    UBORATZ INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $117k · revenue +277%
  • GC
    Georgia Center for Opportunity Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $63k · revenue +99%
  • RC
    ROMANIAN CHRISTIAN ENTERPRISES
    3× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • MS
    Mississippi State University Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $29k · revenue +54%
  • MS
    MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDA
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • RU
    REFORM UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
3
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
4
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
5
Kingdom Advisors Inc

Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…

Religion
6
Josiah Venture

To equip young leaders throughout Central and Eastern Europe to fulfill Christ's commission through the local church.

Religion
7
Biblical Education By Extension Inc

To assist the church, primarily in closed countries, in the establishment of continuing indigenous church-based training centers in which servant leaders are equipped to develop growing and reproducing churches.

Religion
8
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
9
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
10
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
11
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

12
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Fellowship of Evangelical Students Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is 70X7 Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Public University Foundatio…Child and Family ServicesGovernment Accountability R…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%5%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr14%32%20–35yr9%23%35–55yr13%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%2%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr14%16%20–35yr9%72%35–55yr13%5%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,275

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PERIMETER CHURCH — $156,776 · OtherPERIMETER CHURCHMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDA — $25,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDAMSU FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherMSU FOUNDATIONCHRIST CHURCH MANDARIN — $24,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH MANDARINGRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $18,500 · OtherCHRISTIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $15,500 · OtherMISSION TO NORTH AMERICA — $14,600 · OtherMESA GLOBAL — $12,500 · Other+23 more — $56,352 · Other+23 moreUBORATZ INC — $116,500 · EducationUBORATZ INCGeorgia Center for Opportunity Inc — $63,138 · EducationGeorgia Center for Opportunity In…+1 more — $2,200 · EducationMississippi State University Foundation Inc — $29,010 · Human ServicesPromise686 Inc — $3,250 · Human ServicesStreet Grace Inc — $2,055 · Human ServicesForum of Christian Leaders — $12,000 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF EVANGELICAL STUDENTS USA INC — $5,050 · ReligionWellspring Living Inc — $4,000 · ReligionElam Ministries — $3,000 · ReligionEast-West Ministries International — $1,500 · Religion+2 more — $850 · ReligionROMANIAN CHRISTIAN ENTERPRISES — $12,000 · InternationalTHE JACKSON INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 · Public Benefit+1 more — $300 · Public Benefit70X7 Foundation Inc — $7,000 · Philanthropy
Other$348,228Education$181,838Human Services$34,315Religion$26,400International$12,000Public Benefit$10,300Philanthropy$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUBORATZ INC — $116,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetGeorgia Center for Opportunity Inc — $63,138 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMississippi State University Foundation Inc — $29,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForum of Christian Leaders — $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetROMANIAN CHRISTIAN ENTERPRISES — $12,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JACKSON INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF EVANGELICAL STUDENTS USA INC — $5,050 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSERGE GLOBAL INC — $3,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPromise686 Inc — $3,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetElam Ministries — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORE LIFE INCORPORATED — $2,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc — $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStreet Grace Inc — $2,055 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE INC — $2,030 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEast-West Ministries International — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCollege Golf Fellowship — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Colson Center for Christian Worldview — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UBORATZ INC
  • Who funds Georgia Center for Opportunity Inc
  • Who funds Mississippi State University Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Forum of Christian Leaders
  • Who funds ROMANIAN CHRISTIAN ENTERPRISES
  • Who funds THE JACKSON INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds 70X7 Foundation Inc
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF EVANGELICAL STUDENTS USA INC
  • Who funds Wellspring Living Inc
  • Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC
  • Who funds Promise686 Inc
  • Who funds Elam Ministries
  • Who funds RESTORE LIFE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc
  • Who funds Street Grace Inc
  • Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds College Golf Fellowship

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS18.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Richard & Barbara Gaby Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Stinchcomb Family Foundation Inc · The Gaby Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · North Georgia Community Foundation Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thames Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thames Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Thames Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph