Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steven and Lenore Newman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$179k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$362kHousing & Shelter$180kHuman Services$151kInternational$105kPublic Safety & Disaster$83kPhilanthropy$60kFood & Nutrition$33kPublic Benefit$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $80k
$2,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FISHER HOUSE$12,500
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$12,500
USO ANNUAL FUND$12,500
Individual grant recipient$12,500
OPERATION USA$10,000
LA FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION$10,000
DIRECT RELIEF$10,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL PHILADEPHIA$7,500
DYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL$7,500
THE PEOPLE CONCERN$5,000
NO ONE LEFT BEHIND$5,000
SPD FOUNDATION$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORC$5,000
CREATIVE HEALING FOR YOUTH PAIN$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDTATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $5k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $5k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $5k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $5k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $5k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $5k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $5k → 14%NO ONE LEFT BEHIND: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
HI
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 51 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
4

Total granted

$1.3M
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-2%

Still filing today

49%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $113k · revenue +89%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $113k · revenue +32%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • AO
    ART OF THE BRAIN
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION B'NAI ISRAEL
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • SO
    STUDIOS ON THE PARK INC
    one grant, 2019 · $750 · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
2
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
3
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
4
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
10
Northern California Institute for Research and Education Inc

To improve the health and well-being of veterans and the general public by supporting a world-class biomedical research program conducted by ucsf faculty at the san francisco veterans affairs health care system.

Health
11
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
12
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
21/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USO ANNUAL FUND: $122,500 · OtherUSO ANNUAL FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $114,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $112,500 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCCHILDRENS HOSPITAL PHILADEPHIA: $74,350 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL PHILADEPHIAFRIENDS OF THE ISRAELI DEFENSE FORC: $45,000 · OtherSPD FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherLA FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $32,500 · Other+33 more: $370,800 · Other+33 moreHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $112,500 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR…American Heart Association Inc: $22,500 · HealthCREATIVE HEALING FOR YOUTH IN PAIN: $21,500 · HealthDYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 · HealthAUTISM RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $10,000 · HealthCancer Care Inc: $9,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $6,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $4,000 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · HealthDIRECT RELIEF: $50,000 · InternationalOPERATION CALIFORNIA INC: $10,000 · InternationalTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $35,000 · Human ServicesNo One Left Behind: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $15,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $12,500 · PhilanthropyHope For The Warriors: $12,500 · PhilanthropyVENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyIMPRINTS OF HONOR: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureSUPPORT CONNECTION INC: $7,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $750 · Arts & Culture
Other$916,950Housing & Shelter$112,500Health$98,000International$60,000Human Services$60,000Philanthropy$58,000Arts & Culture$55,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $112,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $112,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAMFUND INC: $30,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIMPRINTS OF HONOR: $25,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetNo One Left Behind: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE HEALING FOR YOUTH IN PAIN: $21,500 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetDYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHope For The Warriors: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION CALIFORNIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLeadership Institute: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMOVE UNITED: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUPPORT CONNECTION INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HOME OF THE SPARROW: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPKD Foundation: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECTRUM FOR LIVING CORPORATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR LAS VIRGENES SCHOOLS: $4,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDIOS ON THE PARK INC: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds THE SAMFUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMPRINTS OF HONOR ↗
  • Who funds No One Left Behind ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE HEALING FOR YOUTH IN PAIN ↗
  • Who funds DYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Hope For The Warriors ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds MOVE UNITED ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds VENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH11.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steven and Lenore Newman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steven and Lenore Newman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Move United: 16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steven and Lenore Newman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph