Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steven and Laura Mayer Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$337k
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.0MInternational$464kHuman Services$438kHealth$433kReligion$158kHousing & Shelter$141kFood & Nutrition$108kPhilanthropy$78kOther$0
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k46 grants · $127k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $210k
$3,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Princeton University$35,000
Charity Water$25,000
Everytown for Gun Safety$20,000
Isles$20,000
The Brent Shapiro Foundation$20,000
Working Nation$20,000
Ramona Convent Secondary School$15,000
Feeding America$15,000
Los Angeles Mission$10,000
Our Lady of Mount Carmel$10,000
American Friends of Magen David Adom$10,000
Ukraine relief direct relief$10,000
The New Orleans Jazz & Heritage FoundationThe New Orleans Jazz & Heritage$6,000
Pacific Oaks College & Children's School$5,000
Food Bank of Santa Barbara County$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $431k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE FLAG FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%THE FLAG FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%SUNRISE DAY CAMP: $1k → 6%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%Sunrise Day Camp: $1k → 6%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $25k → 17%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%SUNRISE DAY CAMP: $1k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%Charity Water: $25k → 17%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%OPCC: $1k → 14%Sunrise Day Camp: $1k → 6%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1k → 14%CHARITY WATER: $25k → 17%OPCC: $1k → 14%Charity Water: $25k → 17%Joe Torre Safe At Home Foundation: $5k → 17%Joe Torre Safe At Home Foundation: $5k → 17%Joe Torre Safe At Home Foundation: $5k → 17%Joe Torre Safe At Home Foundation: $5k → 17%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%Joe Torre Safe At Home Foundation: $3k → 17%Joe Torre Safe At Home Foundation: $3k → 17%Para Los Ninos: $2k → 14%Para Los Ninos: $2k → 14%Tia's Hope: $5k → 14%Tia's Hope: $5k → 14%TIA'S HOPE: $5k → 14%TIA'S HOPE: $5k → 14%Charity Water: $25k → 17%Charity Water: $25k → 17%Charity Water: $25k → 17%Charity Water: $25k → 17%Working Nation: $20k → 14%Working Nation: $20k → 14%Working Nation: $20k → 14%Working Nation: $20k → 14%Working Nation: $20k → 14%Para Los Ninos: $2k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $2k → 14%Para Los Ninos: $2k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 68 repeat orgs$124k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 51 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
18

Total granted

$4.1M
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+17%

Still filing today

75%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +5%
  • GI
    GLOBAL INVESTMENT FOUNDATION FOR TOMORROW INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $445k · revenue +37% · 48% of their budget
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $280k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • PP
    PACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -30%
  • LB
    LEWY BODY DEMENTIA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • SB
    SANTA BARBARA FIREFIGHTERS ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
2
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
3
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
4
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
8
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
9
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Jose Antonio Grifols Lucas Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/71
Grantees still filing
52/71
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Trustees of Princeton University: $1,385,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityGLOBAL INVESTMENT FOUNDATION FOR TOMORROW INC: $445,000 · EducationGLOBAL INVESTMENT FOUNDATION FOR TOMORROW INC+5 more: $89,000 · EducationTHE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESS: $185,000 · OtherTHE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATIO…RAMONA CONVENT SECONDARY SCHOOL: $110,000 · OtherRAMONA CONVENT SECONDARY SC…Our Lady of Mount Carmel: $65,000 · OtherOur Lady of Mount CarmelIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON ETHIOPIAN JEWRY INC: $40,000 · OtherEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $45,000 · OtherImpact Inc: $40,000 · Other+49 more: $469,965 · Other+49 moreCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLO…EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Human ServicesEDWARD CHAR…The Flag Foundation: $35,000 · Human ServicesThe Flag Fo…THE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $34,240 · Human ServicesTHE JOE TOR…TIAS HOPE: $15,000 · Human Services+5 more: $42,000 · Human Services+5 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $280,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $25,000 · International+2 more: $14,000 · InternationalISLES INC: $190,000 · Housing & ShelterLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $64,000 · HealthISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $24,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $24,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $24,000 · HealthTHE FIBROLAMELLAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health+4 more: $12,000 · HealthFeeding America: $77,500 · Food & NutritionFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $20,000 · Food & NutritionCALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST: $11,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$1,919,000Other$1,039,965Human Services$426,240International$319,000Housing & Shelter$265,000Health$190,000Food & Nutrition$108,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $1,385,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL INVESTMENT FOUNDATION FOR TOMORROW INC: $445,000 over 6y, 48% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $280,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $200,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetISLES INC: $190,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESS: $185,000 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFeeding America: $77,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $64,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $60,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetImpact Inc: $40,000 over 8y, 27% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON ETHIOPIAN JEWRY INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Flag Foundation: $35,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION: $34,240 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetWILL GEERS THEATRICUM BOTANICUM: $30,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $26,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPacific Oaks Education Corporation: $25,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $25,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWAY ARTS ALLIANCE: $21,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE KESWELL SCHOOL: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $17,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MARYLAND: $16,018 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTIAS HOPE: $15,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetMONTECITO FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetGlobal Green USA: $12,100 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA RANGELAND TRUST: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FIREFIGHTERS ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE COMMUNITY ARSON WATCH AND DISASTER SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetJose Antonio Grifols Lucas Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE FIBROLAMELLAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetImagine Los Angeles Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL INVESTMENT FOUNDATION FOR TOMORROW INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESS ↗
  • Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Impact Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON ETHIOPIAN JEWRY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Flag Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE JOE TORRE SAFE AT HOME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILL GEERS THEATRICUM BOTANICUM ↗
  • Who funds RETURN TO FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Oaks Education Corporation ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds GREENWAY ARTS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC PRIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE KESWELL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MARYLAND ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Manitou Fund · California Community Foundation · Rudi Schulte Family Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steven and Laura Mayer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steven and Laura Mayer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Isles Inc: 21% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Steven and Laura Mayer Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Steven and Laura Mayer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steven and Laura Mayer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph