· Private foundation
Rudi Schulte Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k50 grants · $175k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $265k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK IN | $60,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $30,000 |
| TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| SOLVANG FRIENDSHIP HOUSE | $25,000 |
| UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| JASMINE STAR FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| SANTA BARBARA COUNTY VETERANS | $15,000 |
| FLORA VISTA ELEMENTARY PTA | $15,000 |
| UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| WALDORF SCHOOL OF SANTA BARBARA | $10,000 |
| ARIEL THEATRICAL INC | $10,000 |
| AMAZING STRAYS RESCUE | $10,000 |
| ATLAS ANIMAL RESCUE | $10,000 |
| SOLVANG FESTIVAL THEATER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $580k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
146 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2025, 96 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC9× · 2017–2025 · $458k · revenue +24%- TBTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $228k · revenue +52%
- CACHALLENGED ATHLETES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $199k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- EFENCHANGED FARM SANCTUARY INCone grant, 2020 · $35k
- IHIMPACT HUB TRUSTgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +203%
- TWTHE WAHINE PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +115%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
The organization was established to protect and restore the santa barbara channel and its watersheds through science-based advocacy, education, field work, community engagement, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws.
Provide cash grants and free consulting to grassroots organizations in santa barbara county.
The santa barbara public library foundation supports the long-term health and sustainability of the santa barbara public library through public-private partnerships.
Creating excellent exhibits and educational experiences that celebrate the santa barbara channel and illuminate our rich connections with the sea.
Providing equine veterinary hospital facilities and support services in the care of injured or sick race horses
Cemetery association
To rescue, house and rehabilitate unwanted birds and provide education to parrot owners.
The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.
The scholarship foundation of santa barbara inspires, encourages and supports santa barbara county students to and through college, graduate and vocational school by providing information, advising, and scholarships.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Our mission is to protect public trail access build and maintain safe and sustainable trails and promote public engagement in land stewardship and trail use for all types of outdoor recreation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Yardi Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
168 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 168 of the 281 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Save the Waves Coalition ↗
- Who funds GWENDOLYN STRONG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE COLAB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PALOMAR HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Solvang Friendship House ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHELSEA'S LIGHT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARIEL THEATRICAL INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
- Who funds THE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds WE SUPPORT THE TROOPS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MILLENNIUM SECONDARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SAFE FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds The Adderley School Foundation ↗
- Who funds Notes For Notes Inc ↗
- Who funds ATLAS ANIMAL RESCUE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SAFETY TOWN OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Manitou Fund · Towbes Foundation · Schlinger Family Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · James S Bower Foundation · Kim and Andrew D Busch Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rudi Schulte Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Safe Boating Council Inc — 61% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.