Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sterling & Shelli Gardner Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$445kRecreation & Sports$398kEducation$111kArts & Culture$66kHuman Services$42kPhilanthropy$36kCrime & Legal$35kInternational$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COURAGE REINS$25,000
GIVE KIDS A SMILE$10,000
FIVE 12 FOUNDATION$5,000
ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE POLICY PROJECT$5,000
5 FOR THE FIGHT FOUNDATION$5,000
HAPPY FACTORY$2,500
NEW HOPE CALVARY CHAPEL$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COEUR COMMUNITY CLOSET: $5k → 10%THORN: $5k → 14%A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%HAPPY FACTORY: $3k → 13%TRI-CITIES CHAPLANCY: $10k → 11%HAPPY FACTORY: $2k → 13%TABITHA'S WAY: $3k → 8%STAND WITH UKRAINE: $15k → 8%ENCIRCLE FAMILY AND YOUTH RESOURCE: $5k → 8%ENCIRCLE FAMILY AND YOUTH RESOURCE: $5k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $10k → 8%ELIZABETH SMART FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
IL
NY
OH
CA
UT
VA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 12 repeat orgs$209k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
25

Total granted

$1.1M
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+20%

Still filing today

75%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    Courage Reins
    7× · 2017–2024 · $425k · revenue +86%
  • AH
    American Heritage Schools Inc
    5× · 2017–2023 · $68k · revenue +77%
  • F1
    FIVE 12 FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $36k · revenue +250%

Funded once

  • KC
    KANE COUNTY CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENT
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • SW
    Stand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -90%
  • TC
    Tri-Cities Chaplaincy
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International
2
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
3
Courage Worldwide Inc

To provide homes and resources for children who have been recovered from sex trafficking worldwide so they begin their unique journey of healing and be a courageous leader in the global anti-trafficking movement.

Human Services
4
Utah Domestic Violence Legal Services

Utah Homicide Survivors provides holistic legal representation to families of homicide victims.

Crime & Legal
5
Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc

Provide services to victims and potential victims of child abuse and neglect.

6
HOPE4UTAH

Increase suicide awareness and prevention

Health
7
Every Shelter Inc

Every Shelter's mission is to build a localized refugee-aid ecosystem centered around the needs, preferences, and aspirations of refugees.

Education
8
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
9
Thrive Rescue

Providing care to rescue children from sex slavery, and to build a loving home environment for children to recover.

10
Redemption Ridge

Redemption Ridge is dedicated to bringing hope and healing to young girls rescued from the horrendous world of sex trafficking. We are committed to redeeming lives, restoring dignity and placing purpose in hearts of these precious children.

11
Clean Slate Utah

To help people clear their criminal records and access opportunities. we will do this by: 1) spreading the word about utah's clean slate law to individuals with records, so they are aware of the law and its positive impact on their lives;…

Crime & Legal
12
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Women and Children in Crisis and the most unlike its peers is Coeur Community Closet Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily Philanthropic Founda…Diverse Community Support S…Animal Rescue and WelfareCommunity Assistance Organi…Professional & Membership A…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number29%13%<5yr17%16%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr15%13%20–35yr8%16%35–55yr12%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value29%6%<5yr17%4%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr15%61%20–35yr8%5%35–55yr12%3%55yr+

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/33
the rest of the field
15%
1,823/12,370

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
17/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $390,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL & SEXUAL — $25,000 · OtherKANE COUNTY CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENT — $25,000 · OtherLDS CHURCH — $20,000 · Other+16 more — $81,000 · Other+16 moreCourage Reins — $425,000 · HealthCourage Reins+4 more — $32,000 · Health+4 moreAmerican Heritage Schools Inc — $68,000 · EducationAmerican …STELLA H OAKS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationSTELLA H …HOUSE OF CHAMPIONS — $10,000 · EducationHOUSE OF …Spectrum Academy — $10,000 · EducationSpectrum …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationStand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love — $15,000 · Human ServicesTri-Cities Chaplaincy — $10,000 · Human ServicesEncircle Family and Youth Resource Center — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME — $10,000 · Human ServicesA CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesElizabeth Smart Foundation — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHORN — $5,000 · Human ServicesCOEUR COMMUNITY CLOSET INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY FACTORY INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesTABITHA'S WAY — $2,500 · Human ServicesOUR RESCUE — $66,000 · Arts & CultureFIVE 12 FOUNDATION — $36,000 · PhilanthropyFUR SISTERS FUREVER URS RESCUE INC — $20,000 · Animals
Other$541,000Health$457,000Education$103,000Human Services$72,000Arts & Culture$66,000Philanthropy$36,000Animals$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCourage Reins — $425,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetAmerican Heritage Schools Inc — $68,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $66,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFIVE 12 FOUNDATION — $36,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetStand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Women and Children in Crisis — $12,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTri-Cities Chaplaincy — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEncircle Family and Youth Resource Center — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTELLA H OAKS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBEACHES GO GREEN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF CHAMPIONS — $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSpectrum Academy — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetElizabeth Smart Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFight the New Drug Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHORN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POLICY PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOEUR COMMUNITY CLOSET INC — $5,000 over 1y, 52% of budgetTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAPPY FACTORY INC — $4,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTABITHA'S WAY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ashton Family FoundationUT22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ashton Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · University Impact · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation · Beesley Family Foundation · The Miner Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Derek and Shelaine Maxfield Family Found · Neal and Sherrie Savage Family Foundation · Wheelwright Family Charitable Foundation · Thom & Gail Williamsen Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sterling & Shelli Gardner Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sterling & Shelli Gardner Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sterling & Shelli Gardner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph