How much did DEREK AND SHELAINE MAXFIELD FAMILY FOUND grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of DEREK AND SHELAINE MAXFIELD FAMILY FOUND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $35k
$10k–50k13 grants · $271k
$50k–250k4 grants · $280k
$250k+2 grants · $800k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$667k

Total assets

Largest grants

THE POLICY PROJECT$500,000
THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS$300,000
OK FOUNDATION (OPERTATION KIDS)$100,000
HANDS ON HOUSES (THE EQUIP FOUNDATION)$80,000
RIVER OF PEACE$50,000
MOTHERS WITHOUT BORDERS$50,000
FREEWORLD$35,000
DAILY DOSE FOUNDATION (MALI RISING)$30,000
THE LAST MILE$30,000
LIFTING HANDS INTERNATIONAL$26,000
G20 INTERFAITH FORUM ASSOCIATION$25,000
AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES$25,000
DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM$25,000
ANGEL HOUSE$15,000
MENTORS INTERNATIONAL$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 12%. 7% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$411k · 5 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1212% since the first grant, against +95% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$411k

$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1212%

+95%

Still filing today

40%

43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesInternationalEducationRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HO
HANDS ON HOUSES (THE EQUIP FOUNDATION)
2× · 2022–2024 · $155k
F
FREEWORLD
2× · 2022–2024 · $148k
LH
LIFTING HANDS INTERNATIONAL
2× · 2022–2024 · $68k · revenue +1212%

Funded once

AH
AMERICAN HERITAGE SCHOOLS
one grant, 2022 · $300k · revenue -4%
AF
ACADEMY FOR CREATING ENTERPRISEgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +74%
FT
FIGHT THE NEW DRUG
one grant, 2022 · $133k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Leadership Mission International

We develop a new generation of ethical women leaders to drive positive change by providing exceptional academics, leadership training, alumni support, and community development experiences. We educate and train women in Honduras through a…

International

Habibi International

Habibi International seeks to transform the lives of refugees and internal displaced persons in the Middle East with the love of Jesus by providing humanitarian relief and sustainable development in partnership with local churches and NGOs

International

Apprenticeships for America Inc

The organization works to widen access to rewarding careers for american workers through registered apprenticeships using a combination of policy analysis, advocacy, and the creation of a national network of apprenticeship sponsors.

—

Habitat for Humanity International

Building homes for below poverty level individuals

—

World Hunger Relief Institute

World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.

International

Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures fights extreme poverty through dignified jobs. Founded in 2011, Upaya provides investment and consulting support to early-stage businesses aimed at creating jobs for people living in extreme poverty.

International

Midwives College of Utah

Educate midwives to provide safe, professional and personal maternity and general health care.

Education

Havenly

Havenly is a non-profit, fellowship based program that seeks to empower refugee and immigrant women through job training, education and organizing. havenly pays our participants to attend classes and to job train in our cafe's kitchen.

Employment

American Relief Agency for the

ARAHA strives to alleviate human suffering and build self-reliant communities, by providing humanitarian aid and empowering individuals in the Horn of Africa and here at home.

International

Mountaintop International

Mountaintop International is a nonprofit that is working to build the internal capacity, or "human infrastructure," of low income communities worldwide to solve their own problems. Mountaintop does this through leadership initiatives that…

International

Microfinance Opportunities

Microfinance Opportunities is a global non-profit committed to understanding the economic realities of low-income and marginalized people.

Education

Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stella H Oaks Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Academy for Creating Enterprise. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 32% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/24

the rest of the field

12%

3,426/28,245

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

19/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,443,500Public Benefit$500,000Education$395,000International$248,000Human Services$73,015Recreation & Sports$62,500Health$50,000Religion$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT20.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · University Impact · The Ashton Family Foundation · Beesley Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DEREK AND SHELAINE MAXFIELD FAMILY FOUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE POLICY PROJECT.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 63.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 873544416 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE POLICY PROJECT, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Derek and Shelaine Maxfield Family Found?

Find your warmest path to Derek and Shelaine Maxfield Family Found through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DEREK AND SHELAINE MAXFIELD FAMILY FOUND

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Derek and Shelaine Maxfield Family Found?

More from the funding graph

DEREK AND SHELAINE MAXFIELD FAMILY FOUND

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Derek and Shelaine Maxfield Family Found?

More from the funding graph