Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephens Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$211kHuman Services$41kReligion$16kHousing & Shelter$16kArts & Culture$14kHealth$10kAnimals$8kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - DEAN'S SCHOL$50,000
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - ARCH ENDOWME$10,000
TEACH BEYOND INC$5,500
FREE THE OPPRESSED$5,000
MAGDALENA MINISTRIES INC$5,000
WITTE MUSEUM$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,400
TEXAS AGGIE CORPS OF CADETS ASSN$3,000
AUDUBON NATURE INSTITUTE$2,500
NEW ORLEANS MISSION$2,500
GREATER NEW ORLEANS TEXAS A&M FDTN$2,500
MISSION OF MERCY$2,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CHARITIES$2,000
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF NEW ORLEANS$1,500
HINSDALE COUNTY EMS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MISSION OF MERCY: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 49% of Stephens Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 88%.

Stephens Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91k · 7 repeat orgs$252k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
14

Total granted

$91k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+6%

Still filing today

57%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MAGDALENA MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $26k · revenue +34%
  • AN
    Audubon Nature Institute Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +37%
  • NO
    NEW ORLEANS MISSION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • TA
    TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - DEAN'S SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • TA
    TEXAS A&M UNIVERSTY CORPUS CHRISTI - DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $22k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Zoo Inc

Mission: Connect communities with animals, inspiring action to save wildlife. Vision: Be a leader in the global movement to save wildlife. (Continued on Schedule O) Houston Zoo, Inc. (HZI) strives to be a zoo that practices exemplary…

Animals
2
Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc

The mission of the Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa a/k/a ZooTampa at Lowry Park, is to rescue, rehabilitate and care for animals.(Expanded mission on Schedule O)ZooTampa creates exceptional personalized experiences that connect…

Animals
3
Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Inc

Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…

Environment
4
Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…

Animals
5
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of San Antonio Inc

To provide a safe, caring, and temporary home away from home for the families of children receiving essential medical services in san antonio, texas.

Health
6
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
7
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
8
San Antonio Museum of Art

The San Antonio Museum of Art brings people together with art by collecting, preserving, and presenting significant works of art representing a broad range of history and cultures, advancing human connection and understanding, and…

Arts & Culture
9
State Fair of Texas

The state fair of texas celebrates all things texan by promoting agriculture, education, and community involvement through quality entertainment in a family-friendly environment. the state fair of texas is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit…

Recreation & Sports
10
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as…

Health
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Aggie Corps of Cadets Association; the most unlike its peers is Audubon Nature Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - DEAN'S SCHOL: $50,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - DEAN'S SCHOLTEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - DEAN'S SCHOLARSHIP: $50,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - DEAN'S SCHOLARSHIPTEXAS A&M UNIVERSTY CORPUS CHRISTI - DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT: $40,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSTY CORPUS CHRISTI - DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENTTEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - CORPS OF CADETS: $25,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - CORPS OF CADETSMETRO MINISTRIES: $16,000 · OtherMETRO MINISTRIESUNIVERSITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $13,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M FOUNDATION - ARCH ENDOWME: $10,000 · Other+19 more: $57,832 · Other+19 moreMAGDALENA MINISTRIES INC: $25,500 · Human ServicesMAGDALENA…MISSION OF MERCY INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesMISSION O…Texas A&M Foundation: $22,000 · EducationTEXAS AGGIE CORPS OF CADETS ASSOCIATION: $3,000 · EducationRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES SOUTH TEXAS: $5,000 · HealthPANDAS NETWORKORG: $5,000 · HealthAudubon Nature Institute Inc: $7,500 · AnimalsCITY PARK CONSERVANCY: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsFree the Oppressed: $5,000 · International
Other$261,832Human Services$27,500Education$25,000Health$10,000Animals$7,500Recreation & Sports$6,000International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAGDALENA MINISTRIES INC: $25,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $22,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAudubon Nature Institute Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS MISSION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY PARK CONSERVANCY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES SOUTH TEXAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPANDAS NETWORKORG: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMISSION OF MERCY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF NEW ORLEANS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAGDALENA MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Audubon Nature Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW ORLEANS MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES SOUTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Free the Oppressed ↗
  • Who funds PANDAS NETWORKORG ↗
  • Who funds Witte Museum ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS AGGIE CORPS OF CADETS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX18.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephens Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephens Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stephens Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stephens Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph